Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Klein, A.: Von der Schneeflocke zur Lawine : Möglichkeiten der Nutzung freier Zitationsdaten in Bibliotheken (2017) 0.07 
    0.06846473 = product of:
  0.17116183 = sum of:
    0.124706335 = weight(_text_:o in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.124706335 = score(doc=4002,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2272487 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045293134 = queryNorm
        0.5487659 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
    0.046455488 = product of:
      0.092910975 = sum of:
        0.092910975 = weight(_text_:stand in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092910975 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23326424 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1501017 = idf(docFreq=696, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045293134 = queryNorm
            0.39830783 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1501017 = idf(docFreq=696, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Zitationen spielen eine wichtige Rolle im wissenschaftlichen Diskurs, in der Recherchepraxis sowie im Bereich der Bibliometrie. In jüngster Zeit gibt es zunehmend Initiativen, die Zitationen als Open Data zur freien Nachnutzung verfügbar machen. Der Beitrag beschreibt den Stand der Entwicklung dieser Initiativen und zeigt, dass in nächster Zeit eine kritische Masse von Daten entstehen könnte, aus denen sich gerade für Bibliotheken neue Perspektiven ergeben. Als konkrete Möglichkeit zur Partizipation für Bibliotheken wird das DFG-Projekt Linked Open Citation Database (LOC-DB) vorgestellt.
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2017H4S127-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2017H4S127-136.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.4, S.127-136
  2. Herb, U.: Auch Pierre Bourdieu ist ein Indexierungsopfer (2017) 0.01 
    0.012877271 = product of:
  0.06438635 = sum of:
    0.06438635 = weight(_text_:u in 3669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06438635 = score(doc=3669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14830984 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045293134 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3669)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  3. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.01 
    0.012140809 = product of:
  0.06070404 = sum of:
    0.06070404 = weight(_text_:u in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06070404 = score(doc=5624,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14830984 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045293134 = queryNorm
        0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Der Text ist eine überarbeitete Version des von Herb, U. (2018): Zwangsehen und Bastarde : Wohin steuert Big Data die Wissenschaft? In: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 69(2-3), S. 81-88. DOI:10.1515/iwp-2018-0021.
  4. Herb, U.: Ablehnungsquoten wissenschaftlicher Journale (2016) 0.01 
    0.008584848 = product of:
  0.042924237 = sum of:
    0.042924237 = weight(_text_:u in 2701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042924237 = score(doc=2701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14830984 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045293134 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2701)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  5. Schmitz, J.; Arning, U.; Peters, I.: handbuch.io : Handbuch CoScience / Messung von wissenschaftlichem Impact (2015) 0.01 
    0.007511742 = product of:
  0.03755871 = sum of:
    0.03755871 = weight(_text_:u in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03755871 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14830984 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045293134 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Authors

Themes