Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.04
    0.035684925 = product of:
      0.07136985 = sum of:
        0.07136985 = sum of:
          0.024552397 = weight(_text_:d in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024552397 = score(doc=402,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.28162137 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.009513892 = weight(_text_:s in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009513892 = score(doc=402,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.19069082 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.03730356 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03730356 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  2. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.03
    0.032916203 = product of:
      0.06583241 = sum of:
        0.06583241 = sum of:
          0.018116351 = weight(_text_:d in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018116351 = score(doc=900,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004195232 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.04352082 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04352082 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8
  3. Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012) 0.03
    0.025939818 = product of:
      0.051879637 = sum of:
        0.051879637 = sum of:
          0.010980166 = weight(_text_:d in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010980166 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0035959128 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.03730356 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03730356 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:23:32
    Language
    d
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.2, S.71-80
  4. Haustein, S.; Tunger, D.: Sziento- und bibliometrische Verfahren (2013) 0.01
    0.013390887 = product of:
      0.026781773 = sum of:
        0.026781773 = product of:
          0.04017266 = sum of:
            0.031697012 = weight(_text_:d in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031697012 = score(doc=730,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.36357164 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
            0.008475648 = weight(_text_:s in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008475648 = score(doc=730,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Pages
    S.479-492
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  5. Bannister, A.; Hulek, K.; Teschke, O.: ¬Das Zitationsverhalten in mathematischen Arbeiten : einige Anmerkungen (2017) 0.01
    0.011452049 = product of:
      0.022904098 = sum of:
        0.022904098 = product of:
          0.034356147 = sum of:
            0.0258805 = weight(_text_:d in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0258805 = score(doc=4499,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.296855 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
            0.008475648 = weight(_text_:s in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008475648 = score(doc=4499,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag auf S.204-205: Vier bibliometrische Kennzahlen auf Grundlage von zbMATH-Daten. Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1515/dmvm-2017-0064.
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2017, H.4, S.208-214
  6. Freistetter, F.: Warum jeder (fast) jeden kennt (2017) 0.01
    0.009717386 = product of:
      0.019434772 = sum of:
        0.019434772 = product of:
          0.029152157 = sum of:
            0.021960331 = weight(_text_:d in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021960331 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2017, H.7, S.79
  7. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.01
    0.00849965 = product of:
      0.0169993 = sum of:
        0.0169993 = product of:
          0.02549895 = sum of:
            0.0207044 = weight(_text_:d in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0207044 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.237484 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
            0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047945506 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    Wissenschaftsmanagement. 2013, Juli / August, S.21-25
  8. Walter, P.: Wie (un)zuverlässig ist die Forschung? (2017) 0.01
    0.008097822 = product of:
      0.016195644 = sum of:
        0.016195644 = product of:
          0.024293464 = sum of:
            0.018300276 = weight(_text_:d in 3455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018300276 = score(doc=3455,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 3455, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3455)
            0.0059931884 = weight(_text_:s in 3455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0059931884 = score(doc=3455,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3455, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3455)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2017, H.3, S.36-40
  9. Riechert, M.; Schmitz, J.: Qualitätssicherung von Forschungsinformationen durch visuelle Repräsentation : das Fallbeispiel des "Informationssystems Promotionsnoten" (2017) 0.01
    0.0074371947 = product of:
      0.014874389 = sum of:
        0.014874389 = product of:
          0.022311583 = sum of:
            0.018116351 = weight(_text_:d in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018116351 = score(doc=3724,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
            0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004195232 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
    Pages
    S.411-422
  10. Tüür-Fröhlich, T.: Closed vs. Open Access : Szientometrische Untersuchung dreier sozialwissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften aus der Genderperspektive (2011) 0.01
    0.0074371947 = product of:
      0.014874389 = sum of:
        0.014874389 = product of:
          0.022311583 = sum of:
            0.018116351 = weight(_text_:d in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018116351 = score(doc=4505,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
            0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 4505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004195232 = score(doc=4505,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4505, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4505)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.4, S.173-176
  11. Böhm, P.; Rittberger, M.: Einsatz von Webanalyse in überregionalen Informationsinfrastruktureinrichtungen (2016) 0.01
    0.0074371947 = product of:
      0.014874389 = sum of:
        0.014874389 = product of:
          0.022311583 = sum of:
            0.018116351 = weight(_text_:d in 3239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018116351 = score(doc=3239,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 3239, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3239)
            0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 3239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004195232 = score(doc=3239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3239)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 67(2016) H.4, S.241-251
  12. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie : quo vadis? (2017) 0.01
    0.0074371947 = product of:
      0.014874389 = sum of:
        0.014874389 = product of:
          0.022311583 = sum of:
            0.018116351 = weight(_text_:d in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018116351 = score(doc=3519,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
            0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 3519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004195232 = score(doc=3519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3519)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Pages
    S.388-397
  13. Klein, A.: Von der Schneeflocke zur Lawine : Möglichkeiten der Nutzung freier Zitationsdaten in Bibliotheken (2017) 0.01
    0.0074371947 = product of:
      0.014874389 = sum of:
        0.014874389 = product of:
          0.022311583 = sum of:
            0.018116351 = weight(_text_:d in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018116351 = score(doc=4002,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
            0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004195232 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.4, S.127-136
  14. Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010) 0.01
    0.00687123 = product of:
      0.01374246 = sum of:
        0.01374246 = product of:
          0.020613689 = sum of:
            0.015528301 = weight(_text_:d in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015528301 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.178113 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
            0.005085389 = weight(_text_:s in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005085389 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.6/7, S. 323-324 (D. Lewandowski)
    Language
    d
    Pages
    270 S
  15. Vier bibliometrische Kennzahlen auf Grundlage von zbMATH-Daten (2017) 0.01
    0.0065469462 = product of:
      0.0130938925 = sum of:
        0.0130938925 = product of:
          0.019640839 = sum of:
            0.01294025 = weight(_text_:d in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01294025 = score(doc=4315,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
            0.006700589 = weight(_text_:s in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006700589 = score(doc=4315,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.13430263 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Karte stellt für die deutschen Universitäten und einige zu Vergleichszwecken ausgewählte außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen vier bibliometrische Kennzahlen auf Grundlage von zbMATH-Daten dar: Die Zahl der 2010 publizierten Arbeiten (links oben) und ihre gesamten zugehörigen Zitationen (links unten) sowie die Zahl der 2014 publizierten Arbeiten (rechts oben) und ihre gesamten zugehörigen Zitationen (rechts unten). Die Zusammenfassung auf Universitätsebene begründet sich damit, dass mathematische Arbeiten an einer Universität ggf. von Mitgliedern verschiedener Einrichtungen und/oder Fakultäten geschrieben werden. Die unterschiedliche Struktur der einzelnen Universitäten macht einen Vergleich von Einzeleinrichtungen sehr aufwändig. Zu beachten ist auch, dass die inhärente Fehlerquote sowohl bei der Zuordnung von Referenzstrings zu Arbeiten als auch von Arbeiten zu Autoren und Institutionen sich bei den Gesamtzahlen zu einer Abweichung von bis zu 20 % kumulieren kann. Die Jahre 2010 und 2014 wurden gewählt, da zum einen nach vier Jahren ein signifikanter Anteil der Zitationen relativ zum Publikationswachstum verfügbar ist (vgl. Abb. 4 auf S. 211), zum anderen für 2014 zumindest die Publikationsdaten einschließlich gedruckter Konferenzbände weitgehend vollständig erfasst sind (s. Anmerkung 2 auf Seite S. 213).
    Footnote
    Die Karte wurde nachträglich per Mail vom 19.04.2018 korrigiert und in dem Mitt DMV 2018, H.1, S.4 abgedruckt.
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2017, H.4, S.204-205
  16. Heidenkummer, P.: Wenn das Undurchschaubare zum Maß wird : Probleme und Schwankungen des Impact Factors (2013) 0.01
    0.0064782575 = product of:
      0.012956515 = sum of:
        0.012956515 = product of:
          0.019434772 = sum of:
            0.014640221 = weight(_text_:d in 4672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014640221 = score(doc=4672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 4672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4672)
            0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 4672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047945506 = score(doc=4672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4672)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 16(2013) H.3, S.201-210
  17. May, M.: Bibliometrie - ein Aufgabengebiet von Bibliotheken? (2014) 0.01
    0.0064782575 = product of:
      0.012956515 = sum of:
        0.012956515 = product of:
          0.019434772 = sum of:
            0.014640221 = weight(_text_:d in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014640221 = score(doc=2578,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
            0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047945506 = score(doc=2578,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 48(2014) H.2, S.132-147
  18. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.01
    0.0064782575 = product of:
      0.012956515 = sum of:
        0.012956515 = product of:
          0.019434772 = sum of:
            0.014640221 = weight(_text_:d in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014640221 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
            0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047945506 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Der Text ist eine überarbeitete Version des von Herb, U. (2018): Zwangsehen und Bastarde : Wohin steuert Big Data die Wissenschaft? In: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 69(2-3), S. 81-88. DOI:10.1515/iwp-2018-0021.
    Language
    d
  19. Renn, O.; Schnabl, J.: Forschungsmetriken: Ignorieren, boykottieren oder nutzen? : Forschungsmetriken in die Praxis gebracht (2017) 0.01
    0.0064782575 = product of:
      0.012956515 = sum of:
        0.012956515 = product of:
          0.019434772 = sum of:
            0.014640221 = weight(_text_:d in 5633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014640221 = score(doc=5633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 5633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5633)
            0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 5633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047945506 = score(doc=5633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5633)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.3, S.229-235
  20. Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013) 0.01
    0.006374738 = product of:
      0.012749476 = sum of:
        0.012749476 = product of:
          0.019124214 = sum of:
            0.015528301 = weight(_text_:d in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015528301 = score(doc=928,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.178113 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
            0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0035959128 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Grundsätzlich können wir bei Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft zwischen einer 'qualitative' Form, der Bewertung einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit (z. B. eines Manuskripts oder Forschungsantrags) durch kompetente Peers, und einer 'quantitative' Form, der Bewertung von wissenschaftlicher Arbeit anhand bibliometrischer Indikatoren unterscheiden. Beide Formen der Bewertung sind nicht unumstritten. Die Kritiker des Peer Review sehen vor allem zwei Schwächen des Verfahrens: (1) Verschiedene Gutachter würden kaum in der Bewertung ein und derselben wissenschaftlichen Arbeit übereinstimmen. (2) Gutachterliche Empfehlungen würden systematische Urteilsverzerrungen aufweisen. Gegen die Verwendung von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für die Qualität einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit wird seit Jahren eine Vielzahl von Bedenken geäußert. Zitierhäufigkeiten seien keine 'objektiven' Messungen von wissenschaftlicher Qualität, sondern ein kritisierbares Messkonstrukt. So wird unter anderem kritisiert, dass wissenschaftliche Qualität ein komplexes Phänomen darstelle, das nicht auf einer eindimensionalen Skala (d. h. anhand von Zitierhäufigkeiten) gemessen werden könne. Es werden empirische Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Fairness des Peer Review Verfahrens sowie Forschungsergebnisse zur Güte von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für wissenschaftliche Qualität vorgestellt.
    Language
    d
    Pages
    S.350-356