Search (84 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Wersig, G.: Quantitative Methoden der Benutzerforschung (1981) 0.01 
    0.009374756 = product of:
  0.018749513 = sum of:
    0.018749513 = product of:
      0.037499025 = sum of:
        0.037499025 = weight(_text_:h in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037499025 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  2. Hunter, J.A.: Quantifizierbare Merkmale von Datenbanken (1981) 0.01 
    0.009374756 = product of:
  0.018749513 = sum of:
    0.018749513 = product of:
      0.037499025 = sum of:
        0.037499025 = weight(_text_:h in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037499025 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  3. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.01 
    0.009374756 = product of:
  0.018749513 = sum of:
    0.018749513 = product of:
      0.037499025 = sum of:
        0.037499025 = weight(_text_:h in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037499025 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.14-19
  4. Freistetter, F.: Warum jeder (fast) jeden kennt (2017) 0.01 
    0.009374756 = product of:
  0.018749513 = sum of:
    0.018749513 = product of:
      0.037499025 = sum of:
        0.037499025 = weight(_text_:h in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037499025 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2017, H.7, S.79
  5. Springer, M.: Erlahmt die Forschung? (2023) 0.01 
    0.009374756 = product of:
  0.018749513 = sum of:
    0.018749513 = product of:
      0.037499025 = sum of:
        0.037499025 = weight(_text_:h in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037499025 = score(doc=985,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.3, S.30
  6. Stock, W.: Informetrische Vermessung der Forschung und Entwicklung eines Landes : beispielhafte Resultate und Probleme (1992) 0.01 
    0.0078122974 = product of:
  0.015624595 = sum of:
    0.015624595 = product of:
      0.03124919 = sum of:
        0.03124919 = weight(_text_:h in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03124919 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  7. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation mittels Datenbanken : methodisch einwandfrei? (1995) 0.01 
    0.0078122974 = product of:
  0.015624595 = sum of:
    0.015624595 = product of:
      0.03124919 = sum of:
        0.03124919 = weight(_text_:h in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03124919 = score(doc=2443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1995, H.11, S.118-121
  8. Schramm, R.; Bartkowski, A.: Patentindikatoren zur Ermittlung von Kerninformationen (1996) 0.01 
    0.0078122974 = product of:
  0.015624595 = sum of:
    0.015624595 = product of:
      0.03124919 = sum of:
        0.03124919 = weight(_text_:h in 5357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03124919 = score(doc=5357,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5357, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5357)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 47(1996) H.5, S.293-300
  9. Walter, P.: Wie (un)zuverlässig ist die Forschung? (2017) 0.01 
    0.0078122974 = product of:
  0.015624595 = sum of:
    0.015624595 = product of:
      0.03124919 = sum of:
        0.03124919 = weight(_text_:h in 3455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03124919 = score(doc=3455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3455)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2017, H.3, S.36-40
  10. Bannister, A.; Hulek, K.; Teschke, O.: ¬Das Zitationsverhalten in mathematischen Arbeiten : einige Anmerkungen (2017) 0.01 
    0.0078122974 = product of:
  0.015624595 = sum of:
    0.015624595 = product of:
      0.03124919 = sum of:
        0.03124919 = weight(_text_:h in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03124919 = score(doc=4499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2017, H.4, S.208-214
  11. Dederke, J.; Hirschmann, B.; Johann, D.: ¬Der Data Citation Index von Clarivate : Eine wertvolle Ressource für die Forschung und für Bibliotheken? (2022) 0.01 
    0.0078122974 = product of:
  0.015624595 = sum of:
    0.015624595 = product of:
      0.03124919 = sum of:
        0.03124919 = weight(_text_:h in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03124919 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    B.I.T. Online. 25(2022) H.1, S.21-
  12. Positionspapier der DMV zur Verwendung bibliometrischer Daten (2020) 0.01 
    0.0077337795 = product of:
  0.015467559 = sum of:
    0.015467559 = product of:
      0.030935118 = sum of:
        0.030935118 = weight(_text_:h in 5738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030935118 = score(doc=5738,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 5738, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5738)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    h-index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2019, H.3-4, S.112-117
  13. Tüür-Fröhlich, T.: Blackbox SSCI : Datenerfassung und Datenverarbeitung bei der kommerziellen Indexierung von Zitaten (2019) 0.01 
    0.006765648 = product of:
  0.013531296 = sum of:
    0.013531296 = product of:
      0.027062591 = sum of:
        0.027062591 = weight(_text_:h in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027062591 = score(doc=5779,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.23772003 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Zahlreiche Autoren, Autorinnen und kritische Initiativen (z. B. DORA) kritisieren den zu hohen und schädlichen Einfluss quantitativer Daten, welche akademische Instanzen für Evaluationszwecke heranziehen. Wegen des großen Einflusses der globalen Zitatdatenbanken von Thomson Reuters (bzw. Clarivate Analytics) auf die Bewertung der wissenschaftlichen Leistungen von Forscherinnen und Forschern habe ich extensive qualitative und quantitative Fallstudien zur Datenqualität des Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) durchgeführt, d. h. die Originaleinträge mit den SSCI-Datensätzen verglichen. Diese Fallstudien zeigten schwerste - nie in der Literatur erwähnte - Fehler, Verstümmelungen, Phantomautoren, Phantomwerke (Fehlerrate in der Fallstudie zu Beebe 2010, Harvard Law Review: 99 Prozent). Über die verwendeten Datenerfassungs- und Indexierungsverfahren von TR bzw. Clarivate Analytics ist nur wenig bekannt. Ein Ergebnis meiner Untersuchungen: Bei der Indexierung von Verweisen in Fußnoten (wie in den Rechtswissenschaften, gerade auch der USA, vorgeschrieben) scheinen die verwendeten Textanalyse-Anwendungen und -Algorithmen völlig überfordert. Eine Qualitätskontrolle scheint nicht stattzufinden. Damit steht der Anspruch des SSCI als einer multidisziplinären Datenbank zur Debatte. Korrekte Zitate in den Fußnoten des Originals können zu Phantom-Autoren, Phantom-Werken und Phantom-Referenzen degenerieren. Das bedeutet: Sämtliche Zeitschriften und Disziplinen, deren Zeitschriften und Büchern dieses oder ähnliche Zitierverfahren verwenden (Oxford-Style), laufen Gefahr, aufgrund starker Zitatverluste falsch, d. h. unterbewertet, zu werden. Wie viele UBOs (Unidentifiable Bibliographic Objects) sich in den Datenbanken SCI, SSCI und AHCI befinden, wäre nur mit sehr aufwändigen Prozeduren zu klären. Unabhängig davon handelt es sich, wie bei fast allen in meinen Untersuchungen gefundenen fatalen Fehlern, eindeutig um endogene Fehler in den Datenbanken, die nicht, wie oft behauptet, angeblich falsch zitierenden Autorinnen und Autoren zugeschrieben werden können, sondern erst im Laufe der Dateneingabe und -verarbeitung entstehen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 70(2019) H.5/6, S.241-248
  14. Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996) 0.01 
    0.0062498376 = product of:
  0.012499675 = sum of:
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02499935 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cogito. 12(1996) H.4, S.35-38
  15. Parthey, H.: Stadien der Wissensproduktion in Forschungsinstituten nach Raten der Publikation und Zitation der in ihnen gewonnenen Ergebnisse (1996) 0.01 
    0.0062498376 = product of:
  0.012499675 = sum of:
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 5242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02499935 = score(doc=5242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Göbel, S.: Aspekte der Mathematikliteratur : Untersuchungen in verschiedenen Datenbanken (1997) 0.01 
    0.0062498376 = product of:
  0.012499675 = sum of:
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02499935 = score(doc=2166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 1997, H.2, S.48-53
  17. Pernik, V.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Web Structure Mining am Beispiel von informationswissenschaftlichen Hochschulinstituten im deutschsprachigen Raum (2006) 0.01 
    0.0062498376 = product of:
  0.012499675 = sum of:
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02499935 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.407-414
  18. Heidenkummer, P.: Wenn das Undurchschaubare zum Maß wird : Probleme und Schwankungen des Impact Factors (2013) 0.01 
    0.0062498376 = product of:
  0.012499675 = sum of:
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 4672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02499935 = score(doc=4672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 16(2013) H.3, S.201-210
  19. May, M.: Bibliometrie - ein Aufgabengebiet von Bibliotheken? (2014) 0.01 
    0.0062498376 = product of:
  0.012499675 = sum of:
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02499935 = score(doc=2578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 48(2014) H.2, S.132-147
  20. Renn, O.; Schnabl, J.: Forschungsmetriken: Ignorieren, boykottieren oder nutzen? : Forschungsmetriken in die Praxis gebracht (2017) 0.01 
    0.0062498376 = product of:
  0.012499675 = sum of:
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 5633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02499935 = score(doc=5633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5633)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 20(2017) H.3, S.229-235

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 79
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications