Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.06
    0.05724764 = product of:
      0.2862382 = sum of:
        0.2862382 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2862382 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38197818 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045055166 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Tüür-Fröhlich, T.: Blackbox SSCI : Datenerfassung und Datenverarbeitung bei der kommerziellen Indexierung von Zitaten (2019) 0.01
    0.0075444616 = product of:
      0.03772231 = sum of:
        0.03772231 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03772231 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17540175 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045055166 = queryNorm
            0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Zahlreiche Autoren, Autorinnen und kritische Initiativen (z. B. DORA) kritisieren den zu hohen und schädlichen Einfluss quantitativer Daten, welche akademische Instanzen für Evaluationszwecke heranziehen. Wegen des großen Einflusses der globalen Zitatdatenbanken von Thomson Reuters (bzw. Clarivate Analytics) auf die Bewertung der wissenschaftlichen Leistungen von Forscherinnen und Forschern habe ich extensive qualitative und quantitative Fallstudien zur Datenqualität des Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) durchgeführt, d. h. die Originaleinträge mit den SSCI-Datensätzen verglichen. Diese Fallstudien zeigten schwerste - nie in der Literatur erwähnte - Fehler, Verstümmelungen, Phantomautoren, Phantomwerke (Fehlerrate in der Fallstudie zu Beebe 2010, Harvard Law Review: 99 Prozent). Über die verwendeten Datenerfassungs- und Indexierungsverfahren von TR bzw. Clarivate Analytics ist nur wenig bekannt. Ein Ergebnis meiner Untersuchungen: Bei der Indexierung von Verweisen in Fußnoten (wie in den Rechtswissenschaften, gerade auch der USA, vorgeschrieben) scheinen die verwendeten Textanalyse-Anwendungen und -Algorithmen völlig überfordert. Eine Qualitätskontrolle scheint nicht stattzufinden. Damit steht der Anspruch des SSCI als einer multidisziplinären Datenbank zur Debatte. Korrekte Zitate in den Fußnoten des Originals können zu Phantom-Autoren, Phantom-Werken und Phantom-Referenzen degenerieren. Das bedeutet: Sämtliche Zeitschriften und Disziplinen, deren Zeitschriften und Büchern dieses oder ähnliche Zitierverfahren verwenden (Oxford-Style), laufen Gefahr, aufgrund starker Zitatverluste falsch, d. h. unterbewertet, zu werden. Wie viele UBOs (Unidentifiable Bibliographic Objects) sich in den Datenbanken SCI, SSCI und AHCI befinden, wäre nur mit sehr aufwändigen Prozeduren zu klären. Unabhängig davon handelt es sich, wie bei fast allen in meinen Untersuchungen gefundenen fatalen Fehlern, eindeutig um endogene Fehler in den Datenbanken, die nicht, wie oft behauptet, angeblich falsch zitierenden Autorinnen und Autoren zugeschrieben werden können, sondern erst im Laufe der Dateneingabe und -verarbeitung entstehen.
  3. Marx, W.; Gramm, G.: Literaturflut - Informationslawine - Wissensexplosion : Wächst der Wissenschaft das Wissen über den Kopf? (1997) 0.01
    0.0065168724 = product of:
      0.03258436 = sum of:
        0.03258436 = product of:
          0.06516872 = sum of:
            0.06516872 = weight(_text_:searching in 1078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06516872 = score(doc=1078,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18226127 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045055166 = queryNorm
                0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 1078, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1078)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific information has stopped growing exponentially as in the last 300 years. Nevertheless, the number of scientific papers published yearly remains dramatic. Well orderd databases and sophisticated search systems allow scientists to find the needle in the haystack. A growing number of factual databases as well as more reviews compress and refine information. Not searching but controlling and working up information appear to become the most important problem in the future
  4. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.00
    0.0048834826 = product of:
      0.024417413 = sum of:
        0.024417413 = product of:
          0.048834827 = sum of:
            0.048834827 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048834827 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15777552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045055166 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  5. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.00
    0.004273047 = product of:
      0.021365236 = sum of:
        0.021365236 = product of:
          0.042730473 = sum of:
            0.042730473 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042730473 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15777552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045055166 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
  6. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.00
    0.003662612 = product of:
      0.01831306 = sum of:
        0.01831306 = product of:
          0.03662612 = sum of:
            0.03662612 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03662612 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15777552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045055166 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  7. Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012) 0.00
    0.003662612 = product of:
      0.01831306 = sum of:
        0.01831306 = product of:
          0.03662612 = sum of:
            0.03662612 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03662612 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15777552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045055166 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:23:32
  8. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.00
    0.003662612 = product of:
      0.01831306 = sum of:
        0.01831306 = product of:
          0.03662612 = sum of:
            0.03662612 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03662612 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15777552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045055166 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
  9. Ball, R.: Wissenschaftsindikatoren im Zeitalter digitaler Wissenschaft (2007) 0.00
    0.0030521767 = product of:
      0.015260884 = sum of:
        0.015260884 = product of:
          0.030521767 = sum of:
            0.030521767 = weight(_text_:22 in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030521767 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15777552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045055166 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    23.12.2007 19:22:21
  10. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.00
    0.0030521767 = product of:
      0.015260884 = sum of:
        0.015260884 = product of:
          0.030521767 = sum of:
            0.030521767 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030521767 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15777552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045055166 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  11. Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004) 0.00
    0.0024417413 = product of:
      0.012208707 = sum of:
        0.012208707 = product of:
          0.024417413 = sum of:
            0.024417413 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024417413 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15777552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045055166 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]