Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.045592993 = product of:
  0.06838949 = sum of:
    0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017470727 = score(doc=3132,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
    0.050918765 = product of:
      0.10183753 = sum of:
        0.10183753 = weight(_text_:management in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10183753 = score(doc=3132,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Ordnungssysteme, vor allem in Form von Aktenplänen und business classifications schemes, gelten weiterhin als ein Kernelement von elektronischen Records Management Systemen. Die Rezeption und Nutzung von in den Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften entwickelten normativen Vorgaben und/oder Forschungsergebnissen zu Ordnungssystemen ist in der Records Management Community hingegen noch eher selten und zufällig. Aufgrund der Auswertung aktueller Fachliteratur zum Thema Records Management / Schriftgutverwaltung sowie der Erfahrungen der Autorin in zwei Lehrveranstaltungen, die die Eignung informationswissenschaftlicher Ansätze der Wissensorganisation auf Probleme der Schriftgutverwaltung überprüft haben, lässt sich eine Reihe von konkreten Empfehlungen für die Integration wissensorganisatorischer Expertise bei der Entwicklung von Records Management Systemen auf organisatorischer und inhaltlicher Ebene ableiten.

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Recordsmanagement kein Thema für Information Professionals?"

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.6/7, S.339-354

0.0082357805 = product of:
  0.02470734 = sum of:
    0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02470734 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

DFW: Dokumentation Information. 27 (1979), S.25-29

0.0070592402 = product of:
  0.02117772 = sum of:
    0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02117772 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.5, S.296-297

0.0058827 = product of:
  0.017648099 = sum of:
    0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017648099 = score(doc=2423,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Theme

Information

0.00470616 = product of:
  0.01411848 = sum of:
    0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 5143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01411848 = score(doc=5143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5143)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Identifies the interest in questions of classified catalogues generated by the development of on-line catalogues, establishing a difference between 2 large areas: free access to information items in a systematic arrangement and expressing the contents of books by means of notational symbols in a classification system in a local catalogue. Examines the elements and structure of classification systems, the internationally important universal classifications, the procedures for book display and systematic processing in West German public libraries and exhibtion techniques in West German academic libraries. Covers universal and faceted classifications, as well as classification systems in on-line catalogues