Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.: Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich : AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de (2002) 0.01
    0.014643851 = product of:
      0.051253475 = sum of:
        0.034168985 = weight(_text_:j in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034168985 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
        0.017084492 = product of:
          0.034168985 = sum of:
            0.034168985 = weight(_text_:j in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034168985 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  2. Griesbaum, J.: Evaluierung hybrider Suchsysteme im WWW (2000) 0.01
    0.008786311 = product of:
      0.030752089 = sum of:
        0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 2482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020501392 = score(doc=2482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2482)
        0.010250696 = product of:
          0.020501392 = sum of:
            0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 2482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020501392 = score(doc=2482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  3. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.00
    0.0023714497 = product of:
      0.016600147 = sum of:
        0.016600147 = product of:
          0.033200294 = sum of:
            0.033200294 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033200294 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht