Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.03
    0.034145966 = product of:
      0.06829193 = sum of:
        0.06829193 = sum of:
          0.010796814 = weight(_text_:a in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010796814 = score(doc=261,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053045183 = queryNorm
              0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.05749512 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05749512 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1857552 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053045183 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
    Type
    a
  2. Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.: Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich : AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de (2002) 0.00
    0.0019479821 = product of:
      0.0038959642 = sum of:
        0.0038959642 = product of:
          0.0077919285 = sum of:
            0.0077919285 = weight(_text_:a in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0077919285 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053045183 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  3. Grasso, L.L.; Wahlig, H.: Google und seine Suchparameter : Eine Top 20-Precision Analyse anhand repräsentativ ausgewählter Anfragen (2005) 0.00
    0.0015583857 = product of:
      0.0031167713 = sum of:
        0.0031167713 = product of:
          0.0062335427 = sum of:
            0.0062335427 = weight(_text_:a in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062335427 = score(doc=3275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053045183 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Günther, M.: Vermitteln Suchmaschinen vollständige Bilder aktueller Themen? : Untersuchung der Gewichtung inhaltlicher Aspekte von Suchmaschinenergebnissen in Deutschland und den USA (2016) 0.00
    9.7399106E-4 = product of:
      0.0019479821 = sum of:
        0.0019479821 = product of:
          0.0038959642 = sum of:
            0.0038959642 = weight(_text_:a in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0038959642 = score(doc=3068,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06116359 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053045183 = queryNorm
                0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a