Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Kluck, M.; Winter, M.: Topic-Entwicklung und Relevanzbewertung bei GIRT : ein Werkstattbericht (2006) 0.01
    0.011474612 = product of:
      0.04589845 = sum of:
        0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 5967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04589845 = score(doc=5967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5967)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  2. Mandl, T.: Neue Entwicklungen bei den Evaluierungsinitiativen im Information Retrieval (2006) 0.01
    0.011474612 = product of:
      0.04589845 = sum of:
        0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 5975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04589845 = score(doc=5975,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5975, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5975)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  3. Wolff, C.: Leistungsvergleich der Retrievaloberflächen zwischen Web und klassischen Expertensystemen (2001) 0.01
    0.010040285 = product of:
      0.04016114 = sum of:
        0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04016114 = score(doc=5870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Kluck, M.; Mandl, T.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) : Europäische Initiative zur Bewertung sprachübergreifender Retrievalverfahren (2002) 0.01
    0.010040285 = product of:
      0.04016114 = sum of:
        0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04016114 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01
    0.0059130243 = product of:
      0.023652097 = sum of:
        0.023652097 = product of:
          0.047304194 = sum of:
            0.047304194 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047304194 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  6. Womser-Hacker, C.: Theorie des Information Retrieval III : Evaluierung (2004) 0.01
    0.005737306 = product of:
      0.022949224 = sum of:
        0.022949224 = weight(_text_:c in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022949224 = score(doc=2919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)