Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Bollmann-Sdorra, P.: Probleme der Validität bei Retrievaltests (1990) 0.05 
    0.045066766 = product of:
  0.09013353 = sum of:
    0.09013353 = product of:
      0.18026707 = sum of:
        0.18026707 = weight(_text_:probleme in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18026707 = score(doc=5113,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24323422 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.743203 = idf(docFreq=1046, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05128058 = queryNorm
            0.74112546 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.743203 = idf(docFreq=1046, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag werden beispielhaft Probleme der Validität bei Retrievaltests behandelt. Die externe Validität wird im Zusammenhang von Ähnlichkeitsmaßen und Bewertungsmaßen diskutiert. Die interne Validität wird am Beispiel der Mittelwertbildung diskutiert. Es zeigt sich, daß die Forderung nach Validität die zur Auswahl stehenden Methoden einschränkt
  2. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02 
    0.024317337 = product of:
  0.048634674 = sum of:
    0.048634674 = product of:
      0.09726935 = sum of:
        0.09726935 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09726935 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17957586 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05128058 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  3. Kluck, M.; Mandl, T.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) : Europäische Initiative zur Bewertung sprachübergreifender Retrievalverfahren (2002) 0.02 
    0.022306912 = product of:
  0.044613823 = sum of:
    0.044613823 = product of:
      0.08922765 = sum of:
        0.08922765 = weight(_text_:probleme in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08922765 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24323422 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.743203 = idf(docFreq=1046, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05128058 = queryNorm
            0.3668384 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.743203 = idf(docFreq=1046, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Multilinguale Probleme
  4. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01 
    0.0138956215 = product of:
  0.027791243 = sum of:
    0.027791243 = product of:
      0.055582486 = sum of:
        0.055582486 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055582486 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17957586 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05128058 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  5. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.01 
    0.010421716 = product of:
  0.020843431 = sum of:
    0.020843431 = product of:
      0.041686863 = sum of:
        0.041686863 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041686863 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17957586 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05128058 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54

Authors

Years

Themes