Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.02 
    0.018596519 = product of:
  0.037193038 = sum of:
    0.037193038 = product of:
      0.055789553 = sum of:
        0.012602604 = weight(_text_:e in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012602604 = score(doc=2889,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06545277 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.19254501 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.043186948 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043186948 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15946099 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Als dynamische und einfache Form der Auszeichnung von Ressourcen kann sich Tagging im E-Learning positiv auf Partizipation, soziale Navigation und das Verständnis der Lernenden auswirken. Dieser Beitrag beleuchtet verschiedene Möglichkeiten des Einsatzes von Social Tagging in Lehrportalen und E-LearningKursen. Hierzu werden zunächst drei konkrete Anwendungsfälle dargestellt. Anschließend werden aus den Anwendungsfällen gewonnene Erkenntnisse für Lehr-/Lernszenarien zusammengefasst.
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  2. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.01 
    0.01441802 = product of:
  0.02883604 = sum of:
    0.02883604 = product of:
      0.04325406 = sum of:
        0.006236671 = weight(_text_:e in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006236671 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06545277 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
        0.037017386 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037017386 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15946099 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  3. Peters, I.; Schumann, L.; Terliesner, J.: Folksonomy-basiertes Information Retrieval unter der Lupe (2012) 0.01 
    0.008381012 = product of:
  0.016762024 = sum of:
    0.016762024 = product of:
      0.05028607 = sum of:
        0.05028607 = weight(_text_:j in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05028607 = score(doc=406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.144692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-4/iwp-2012-0047/iwp-2012-0047.xml?format=INT.
  4. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01 
    0.008226085 = product of:
  0.01645217 = sum of:
    0.01645217 = product of:
      0.049356513 = sum of:
        0.049356513 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049356513 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15946099 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.15-22
  5. Bertram, J.: Social Tagging : zum Potential einer neuen Indexiermethode (2009) 0.01 
    0.00592627 = product of:
  0.01185254 = sum of:
    0.01185254 = product of:
      0.03555762 = sum of:
        0.03555762 = weight(_text_:j in 2328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03555762 = score(doc=2328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.144692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2328)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Voß, J.: Vom Social Tagging zum Semantic Tagging (2008) 0.01 
    0.00592627 = product of:
  0.01185254 = sum of:
    0.01185254 = product of:
      0.03555762 = sum of:
        0.03555762 = weight(_text_:j in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03555762 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.144692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Blank, M.; Bopp, T.; Hampel, T.; Schulte, J.: Social Tagging = Soziale Suche? (2008) 0.01 
    0.00592627 = product of:
  0.01185254 = sum of:
    0.01185254 = product of:
      0.03555762 = sum of:
        0.03555762 = weight(_text_:j in 2888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03555762 = score(doc=2888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.144692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2888)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Sack, H.; Waitelonis, J.: Zeitbezogene kollaborative Annotation zur Verbesserung der inhaltsbasierten Videosuche (2008) 0.01 
    0.00592627 = product of:
  0.01185254 = sum of:
    0.01185254 = product of:
      0.03555762 = sum of:
        0.03555762 = weight(_text_:j in 2890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03555762 = score(doc=2890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.144692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2890)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Tschetschonig, K.; Ladengruber, R.; Hampel, T.; Schulte, J.: Kollaborative Tagging-Systeme im Electronic Commerce (2008) 0.01 
    0.00592627 = product of:
  0.01185254 = sum of:
    0.01185254 = product of:
      0.03555762 = sum of:
        0.03555762 = weight(_text_:j in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03555762 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.144692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Heck, T.: Analyse von sozialen Informationen für Autorenempfehlungen (2012) 0.01 
    0.00507966 = product of:
  0.01015932 = sum of:
    0.01015932 = product of:
      0.03047796 = sum of:
        0.03047796 = weight(_text_:j in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03047796 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.144692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-4/iwp-2012-0048/iwp-2012-0048.xml?format=INT.
  11. Lüth, J.: Inhaltserschließung von Internetquellen durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer : Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der Virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz (2009) 0.00 
    0.00423305 = product of:
  0.0084661 = sum of:
    0.0084661 = product of:
      0.0253983 = sum of:
        0.0253983 = weight(_text_:j in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0253983 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.144692 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Peters, I.: Folksonomies & Social Tagging (2023) 0.00 
    0.0012126861 = product of:
  0.0024253721 = sum of:
    0.0024253721 = product of:
      0.0072761164 = sum of:
        0.0072761164 = weight(_text_:e in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072761164 = score(doc=796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06545277 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04553648 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die Erforschung und der Einsatz von Folksonomies und Social Tagging als nutzerzentrierte Formen der Inhaltserschließung und Wissensrepräsentation haben in den 10 Jahren ab ca. 2005 ihren Höhenpunkt erfahren. Motiviert wurde dies durch die Entwicklung und Verbreitung des Social Web und der wachsenden Nutzung von Social-Media-Plattformen (s. Kapitel E 8 Social Media und Social Web). Beides führte zu einem rasanten Anstieg der im oder über das World Wide Web auffindbaren Menge an potenzieller Information und generierte eine große Nachfrage nach skalierbaren Methoden der Inhaltserschließung.

Authors

Years

Themes