Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.00
    0.0029661467 = product of:
      0.023729173 = sum of:
        0.023729173 = product of:
          0.05932293 = sum of:
            0.02979548 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02979548 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09582926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02724212 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
            0.02952745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02952745 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.095397264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02724212 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 9:55:29
    Pages
    S.15-22
  2. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.00
    0.0026874233 = product of:
      0.021499386 = sum of:
        0.021499386 = product of:
          0.053748466 = sum of:
            0.03160288 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03160288 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09582926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02724212 = queryNorm
                0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
            0.022145586 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022145586 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.095397264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02724212 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:15:36
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  3. Seehaus, S.: Können Suchmaschinen von Sozialer Software profitieren? (2008) 0.00
    7.724866E-4 = product of:
      0.006179893 = sum of:
        0.006179893 = product of:
          0.030899463 = sum of:
            0.030899463 = weight(_text_:28 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030899463 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09758845 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02724212 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    24.10.2008 12:28:45
  4. Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Benz, D.; Grahl, M.; Krause, B.; Schmitz, C.; Stumme, G.: Social Bookmarking am Beispiel BibSonomy (2009) 0.00
    7.724866E-4 = product of:
      0.006179893 = sum of:
        0.006179893 = product of:
          0.030899463 = sum of:
            0.030899463 = weight(_text_:28 in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030899463 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09758845 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02724212 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2012 19:00:28
  5. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.00
    7.4488705E-4 = product of:
      0.0059590964 = sum of:
        0.0059590964 = product of:
          0.02979548 = sum of:
            0.02979548 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02979548 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09582926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02724212 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Pages
    S.29-53
  6. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00
    6.4591295E-4 = product of:
      0.0051673036 = sum of:
        0.0051673036 = product of:
          0.025836518 = sum of:
            0.025836518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025836518 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.095397264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02724212 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  7. Panke, S.; Gaiser, B.: "With my head up in the clouds" : Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht (2008) 0.00
    5.7936495E-4 = product of:
      0.0046349196 = sum of:
        0.0046349196 = product of:
          0.023174597 = sum of:
            0.023174597 = weight(_text_:28 in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023174597 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09758845 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02724212 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    28 Prozent der amerikanischen Internetnutzer/innen haben es bereits getan: Das freie Verschlagworten von Inhalten aller Art per Social Tagging gehört zu den Anwendungen aus dem Kontext von Web 2.0, die sich zunehmender Beliebtheit erfreuen (Rainie, 2007). Während sich die bisherige Forschung überwiegend inhaltsanalytisch mit dem Phänomen befasst, kommen im vorliegenden Beitrag so genannte "Power User" zu Wort. Um zu einer fundierteren Interpretation der in den Inhaltsanalysen gewonnenen Erkenntnisse beizutragen, wurden Interviews mit Personen durchgeführt, die mehrere Tagging Systeme parallel einsetzen, sich auch mit den technischen Grundlagen auskennen und als "Early Adopter" bereits seit geraumer Zeit aktiv sind. Entsprechend leitet der Beitrag von einer Synopse der aktuellen Literatur in die beschriebene Studie über und schließt mit einem Ausblick auf zukünftige Forschungsvorhaben im Kontext von Social Tagging.