Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Seehaus, S.: Können Suchmaschinen von Sozialer Software profitieren? (2008) 0.00 
    0.0037603013 = product of:
  0.018801507 = sum of:
    0.012566676 = product of:
      0.037700027 = sum of:
        0.037700027 = weight(_text_:t in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037700027 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.00623483 = product of:
      0.03117415 = sum of:
        0.03117415 = weight(_text_:28 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03117415 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen eines Projekts gingen Stu­dierende an der HAW Hamburg für ihre Auftraggeber Lycos Europe und T-Online der Frage nach, wie sich Inhalte aus sozialen Suchdiensten in die algorithmische Suche einbinden lassen. Dazu analysierten und verglichen sie die Vor- und Nachteile der Systeme, die Relevanz der Sucher­gebnisse, die Benutzerfreundlichkeit sowie die Qualität der Inhalte. Für soziale Software ergaben sich daraus bedeutende Verbesserungspotentiale. Der Text beschreibt die Ergebnisse und die Empfehlungen für Lycos IQ.
    Date
    24.10.2008 12:28:45
  2. Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Benz, D.; Grahl, M.; Krause, B.; Schmitz, C.; Stumme, G.: Social Bookmarking am Beispiel BibSonomy (2009) 0.00 
    0.0037603013 = product of:
  0.018801507 = sum of:
    0.012566676 = product of:
      0.037700027 = sum of:
        0.037700027 = weight(_text_:t in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037700027 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.00623483 = product of:
      0.03117415 = sum of:
        0.03117415 = weight(_text_:28 in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03117415 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Date
    3. 1.2012 19:00:28
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  3. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.00 
    0.002394012 = product of:
  0.02394012 = sum of:
    0.02394012 = product of:
      0.059850298 = sum of:
        0.030060355 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030060355 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
        0.029789941 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029789941 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 9:55:29
    Pages
    S.15-22
  4. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.00 
    0.0021690512 = product of:
  0.021690512 = sum of:
    0.021690512 = product of:
      0.05422628 = sum of:
        0.031883825 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031883825 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
        0.022342455 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022342455 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:15:36
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  5. Blank, M.; Bopp, T.; Hampel, T.; Schulte, J.: Social Tagging = Soziale Suche? (2008) 0.00 
    0.0015550468 = product of:
  0.015550467 = sum of:
    0.015550467 = product of:
      0.0466514 = sum of:
        0.0466514 = weight(_text_:t in 2888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0466514 = score(doc=2888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.4308728 = fieldWeight in 2888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2888)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  6. Derntl, M.; Hampel, T.; Motschnig, R.; Pitner, T.: Social Tagging und Inclusive Universal Access (2008) 0.00 
    0.0013328973 = product of:
  0.013328973 = sum of:
    0.013328973 = product of:
      0.03998692 = sum of:
        0.03998692 = weight(_text_:t in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03998692 = score(doc=2864,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.36931956 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  7. Tschetschonig, K.; Ladengruber, R.; Hampel, T.; Schulte, J.: Kollaborative Tagging-Systeme im Electronic Commerce (2008) 0.00 
    0.0010995842 = product of:
  0.010995842 = sum of:
    0.010995842 = product of:
      0.032987524 = sum of:
        0.032987524 = weight(_text_:t in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032987524 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  8. Blumauer, A.; Hochmeister, M.: Tag-Recommender gestützte Annotation von Web-Dokumenten (2009) 0.00 
    0.0010995842 = product of:
  0.010995842 = sum of:
    0.010995842 = product of:
      0.032987524 = sum of:
        0.032987524 = weight(_text_:t in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032987524 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  9. Pammer, V.; Ley, T.; Lindstaedt, S.: tagr: Unterstützung in kollaborativen Tagging-Umgebungen durch semantische und assoziative Netzwerke (2008) 0.00 
    9.425007E-4 = product of:
  0.009425007 = sum of:
    0.009425007 = product of:
      0.02827502 = sum of:
        0.02827502 = weight(_text_:t in 2898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02827502 = score(doc=2898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2898)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  10. Heck, T.: Analyse von sozialen Informationen für Autorenempfehlungen (2012) 0.00 
    9.425007E-4 = product of:
  0.009425007 = sum of:
    0.009425007 = product of:
      0.02827502 = sum of:
        0.02827502 = weight(_text_:t in 407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02827502 = score(doc=407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=407)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  11. Niemann, C.: Intelligenz im Chaos : erste Schritte zur Analyse des Kreativen Potenzials eines Tagging-Systems (2010) 0.00 
    7.8541733E-4 = product of:
  0.007854173 = sum of:
    0.007854173 = product of:
      0.023562517 = sum of:
        0.023562517 = weight(_text_:t in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023562517 = score(doc=4375,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    ¬The Ne(x)t generation: das Angebot der Bibliotheken; 30. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag, Graz, 15.-18.9.2009. Hrsg.: Ute Bergner u. Erhard Göbel
  12. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.00 
    6.012071E-4 = product of:
  0.006012071 = sum of:
    0.006012071 = product of:
      0.030060355 = sum of:
        0.030060355 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030060355 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Pages
    S.29-53
  13. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00 
    5.21324E-4 = product of:
  0.0052132397 = sum of:
    0.0052132397 = product of:
      0.026066197 = sum of:
        0.026066197 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026066197 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  14. Panke, S.; Gaiser, B.: "With my head up in the clouds" : Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht (2008) 0.00 
    4.6761223E-4 = product of:
  0.004676122 = sum of:
    0.004676122 = product of:
      0.023380611 = sum of:
        0.023380611 = weight(_text_:28 in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023380611 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    28 Prozent der amerikanischen Internetnutzer/innen haben es bereits getan: Das freie Verschlagworten von Inhalten aller Art per Social Tagging gehört zu den Anwendungen aus dem Kontext von Web 2.0, die sich zunehmender Beliebtheit erfreuen (Rainie, 2007). Während sich die bisherige Forschung überwiegend inhaltsanalytisch mit dem Phänomen befasst, kommen im vorliegenden Beitrag so genannte "Power User" zu Wort. Um zu einer fundierteren Interpretation der in den Inhaltsanalysen gewonnenen Erkenntnisse beizutragen, wurden Interviews mit Personen durchgeführt, die mehrere Tagging Systeme parallel einsetzen, sich auch mit den technischen Grundlagen auskennen und als "Early Adopter" bereits seit geraumer Zeit aktiv sind. Entsprechend leitet der Beitrag von einer Synopse der aktuellen Literatur in die beschriebene Studie über und schließt mit einem Ausblick auf zukünftige Forschungsvorhaben im Kontext von Social Tagging.

Authors

Years

Themes