Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Good tags - bad tags : Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.01
    0.009517768 = product of:
      0.05710661 = sum of:
        0.05710661 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05710661 = score(doc=3054,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22281809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033960536 = queryNorm
            0.25629252 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    RSWK
    Wissensorganisation / Social Tagging / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Wissensorganisation / Social Tagging / Aufsatzsammlung
  2. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.00
    0.0049302056 = product of:
      0.029581232 = sum of:
        0.029581232 = product of:
          0.07395308 = sum of:
            0.037143603 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037143603 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11946255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033960536 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
            0.03680947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03680947 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.118924014 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033960536 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 9:55:29
    Pages
    S.15-22
  3. Seehaus, S.: Können Suchmaschinen von Sozialer Software profitieren? (2008) 0.00
    0.001283995 = product of:
      0.0077039697 = sum of:
        0.0077039697 = product of:
          0.03851985 = sum of:
            0.03851985 = weight(_text_:28 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03851985 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12165558 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033960536 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    24.10.2008 12:28:45
  4. Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Benz, D.; Grahl, M.; Krause, B.; Schmitz, C.; Stumme, G.: Social Bookmarking am Beispiel BibSonomy (2009) 0.00
    0.001283995 = product of:
      0.0077039697 = sum of:
        0.0077039697 = product of:
          0.03851985 = sum of:
            0.03851985 = weight(_text_:28 in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03851985 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12165558 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033960536 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2012 19:00:28
  5. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00
    0.0010736096 = product of:
      0.0064416574 = sum of:
        0.0064416574 = product of:
          0.032208286 = sum of:
            0.032208286 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032208286 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.118924014 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033960536 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  6. Panke, S.; Gaiser, B.: "With my head up in the clouds" : Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht (2008) 0.00
    9.6299616E-4 = product of:
      0.005777977 = sum of:
        0.005777977 = product of:
          0.028889885 = sum of:
            0.028889885 = weight(_text_:28 in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028889885 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12165558 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033960536 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    28 Prozent der amerikanischen Internetnutzer/innen haben es bereits getan: Das freie Verschlagworten von Inhalten aller Art per Social Tagging gehört zu den Anwendungen aus dem Kontext von Web 2.0, die sich zunehmender Beliebtheit erfreuen (Rainie, 2007). Während sich die bisherige Forschung überwiegend inhaltsanalytisch mit dem Phänomen befasst, kommen im vorliegenden Beitrag so genannte "Power User" zu Wort. Um zu einer fundierteren Interpretation der in den Inhaltsanalysen gewonnenen Erkenntnisse beizutragen, wurden Interviews mit Personen durchgeführt, die mehrere Tagging Systeme parallel einsetzen, sich auch mit den technischen Grundlagen auskennen und als "Early Adopter" bereits seit geraumer Zeit aktiv sind. Entsprechend leitet der Beitrag von einer Synopse der aktuellen Literatur in die beschriebene Studie über und schließt mit einem Ausblick auf zukünftige Forschungsvorhaben im Kontext von Social Tagging.
  7. Komus, A.; Wauch, F.: Wikimanagement : was Unternehmen von Social-Software und Web 2.0 lernen können (2008) 0.00
    6.419975E-4 = product of:
      0.0038519849 = sum of:
        0.0038519849 = product of:
          0.019259924 = sum of:
            0.019259924 = weight(_text_:28 in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019259924 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12165558 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033960536 = queryNorm
                0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    28. 5.2008 9:53:41

Types