Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.12
    0.12416791 = product of:
      0.24833582 = sum of:
        0.062083956 = product of:
          0.18625186 = sum of:
            0.18625186 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18625186 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39767802 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18625186 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18625186 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39767802 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  2. Kauke, V.; Klotz-Berendes, B.: Wechsel des Bibliothekssystems in die Cloud (2015) 0.05
    0.05242333 = product of:
      0.10484666 = sum of:
        0.069153175 = weight(_text_:services in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069153175 = score(doc=2474,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
        0.03569348 = product of:
          0.07138696 = sum of:
            0.07138696 = weight(_text_:management in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07138696 = score(doc=2474,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Cloudbasierte Bibliothekssysteme stellen die neue Generation der Bibliothekssysteme dar. Sie ermöglichen ein gemeinsames Management von Print- und elektronischen Medien. Da in der Hochschulbibliothek der Fachhochschule Münster die elektronischen Ressourcen entscheidend zur Literaturversorgung von Lehrenden und Studierenden beitragen, beschäftigt sich ein Projektteam seit Ende 2014 mit der Evaluation des Systems WorldShare Management Services (WMS) der Firma OCLC. Die ersten Ergebnisse und einige weitere Überlegungen zur Migration des Systems werden in diesem Beitrag vorgestellt.
    Object
    WorldShare Management Services
  3. Meyer-Doerpinghaus, U.; Tröger, B.: Forschungsdatenmanagement als Herausforderung für Hochschulen und Hochschulbibliotheken (2015) 0.05
    0.04914839 = product of:
      0.09829678 = sum of:
        0.069153175 = weight(_text_:services in 2472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069153175 = score(doc=2472,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2472, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2472)
        0.029143604 = product of:
          0.058287207 = sum of:
            0.058287207 = weight(_text_:management in 2472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058287207 = score(doc=2472,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 2472, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Eines der wichtigsten neuen Handlungsfelder der Forschung, das im Zuge der Digitalisierung von Information entstanden ist, ist das Management von Forschungsdaten. Die Hochschulen müssen sich darauf einstellen, ihren Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern die notwendigen Strukturen und Services zur Verfügung zu stellen. Die in der Hochschulrektorenkonferenz (HRK) organisierten Leitungen der deutschen Hochschulen sehen darin eine zentrale Aufgabe. Die Universität Münster geht mit gutem Beispiel voran: In enger Zusammenarbeit mit der Hochschulleitung hat die Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek damit begonnen, Strukturen und Services zur Unterstützung des Forschungsdatenmanagements aufzubauen.
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  4. Fietkiewicz, K.J.; Stock, W.G.: Jedem seine eigene "Truman Show" : YouNow, Periscope, Ustream und ihre Nutzer - "Social Live"-Streaming Services (2017) 0.02
    0.017288294 = product of:
      0.069153175 = sum of:
        0.069153175 = weight(_text_:services in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069153175 = score(doc=3770,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die seinerzeit 19-jährige Studentin Katrin Scheibe war 2015 Teilnehmerin an einem Seminar der Uni Düsseldorf über "Social Live"-Streaming Services und hat mit anderen Studenten zusammen eine Live-Übertragung einer Sitzung über YouNow durchgeführt. Innerhalb des rund einstündigen Programms schnellte die Zuschauerzahl auf weit über 200 hoch. Die meist jugendlichen Zuseher empfanden es als höchst interessant, eine Uni-Lehrveranstaltung hautnah miterleben zu dürfen. Ebenso waren die Studenten von dem aktuellen und zeitnahen Thema begeistert und publizierten ihre Forschungsresultate unter einem Pseudonym (Mathilde B. Friedländer) in internationalen Fachzeitschriften.
  5. Tetzchner, J. von: As a monopoly in search and advertising Google is not able to resist the misuse of power : is the Internet turning into a battlefield of propaganda? How Google should be regulated (2017) 0.02
    0.016171718 = product of:
      0.06468687 = sum of:
        0.06468687 = weight(_text_:services in 3891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06468687 = score(doc=3891,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.3756214 = fieldWeight in 3891, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3891)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    "Let us start with your positive experiences with Google. I have known Google longer than most. At Opera, we were the first to add their search into the browser interface, enabling it directly from the search box and the address field. At that time, Google was an up-and-coming geeky company. I remember vividly meeting with Google's co-founder Larry Page, his relaxed dress code and his love for the Danger device, which he played with throughout our meeting. Later, I met with the other co-founder of Google, Sergey Brin, and got positive vibes. My first impression of Google was that it was a likeable company. Our cooperation with Google was a good one. Integrating their search into Opera helped us deliver a better service to our users and generated revenue that paid the bills. We helped Google grow, along with others that followed in our footsteps and integrated Google search into their browsers. Then the picture for you and for opera darkened. Yes, then things changed. Google increased their proximity with the Mozilla foundation. They also introduced new services such as Google Docs. These services were great, gained quick popularity, but also exposed the darker side of Google. Not only were these services made to be incompatible with Opera, but also encouraged users to switch their browsers. I brought this up with Sergey Brin, in vain. For millions of Opera users to be able to access these services, we had to hide our browser's identity. The browser sniffing situation only worsened after Google started building their own browser, Chrome. ...
    How should Google be regulated? We should limit the amount of information that is being collected. In particular we should look at information that is being collected across sites. It should not be legal to combine data from multiple sites and services. The fact that these sites and services are using the same underlying technology does not change the fact that the user's dealings is with a site at a time and each site should not have the right to share the data with others. I believe this the cornerstone of laws in many countries today, but these laws need to be enforced. Data about us is ours alone and it should not be possible to sell it. We should also limit the ability to target users individually. In the past, ads on sites were ads on sites. You might know what kind of users visited a site and you would place tech ads on tech sites and fashion ads on fashion sites. Now the ads follow you individually. That should be made illegal as it uses data collected from multiple sources and invades our privacy. I also believe there should be regulation as to how location data is used and any information related to our mobile devices. In addition, regulators need to be vigilant as to how companies that have monopoly power use their power. That kind of goes without saying. Companies with monopoly powers should not be able to use those powers when competing in an open market or using their monopoly services to limit competition."
  6. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01
    0.011234601 = product of:
      0.044938404 = sum of:
        0.044938404 = product of:
          0.08987681 = sum of:
            0.08987681 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08987681 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  7. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.01
    0.0111216875 = product of:
      0.04448675 = sum of:
        0.04448675 = product of:
          0.0889735 = sum of:
            0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0889735 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  8. Wetzel, D.: Bücher, Spielzeug, Daten, Krieg : Die globalen Software- und Internetriesen drängen in das Geschäft mit »Sicherheit«. (2019) 0.01
    0.010478289 = product of:
      0.041913155 = sum of:
        0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 3955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041913155 = score(doc=3955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 3955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3955)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Menschen in Deutschland ist Amazon vor allem bekannt als Onlinehändler, der ihnen fast alles nach Hause liefert: Bücher und Küchengeräte, Musik, Spielzeug und Möbel. Doch ist der USTechnologiekonzern mehr als ein riesiges Versandhaus - er ist auch ein gigantischer Datenspeicher. Diese Speicher nutzen inzwischen auch die Polizei, die Geheimdienste - und bald vielleicht auch das US-Militär. Zwischen den großen Cloud-Anbietern ist ein Kampf um einen Großauftrag entbrannt, mit dem das Pentagon seine weltweite Kriegsführung optimieren will. Amazon hat gute Chancen. Die »Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung« hatte Anfang März unter Berufung auf Behördenangaben berichtet, dass Amazons Tochterunternehmen Amazon Web Services die Bodycam-Aufnahmen der deutschen Bundespolizei auf ihren Cloudservern speichert. Damit ist die Bundespolizei nicht allein. Die CIA schloss schon 2013 einen Vertrag über etwa eine halbe Milliarde Dollar mit Amazon ab. Seitdem werden Daten des US-Geheimdienstes in der Cloud von Amazon gespeichert.
  9. Dierkes, J.; Curdt, C.: Von der Idee zum Konzept : Forschungsdatenmanagement an der Universität zu Köln (2018) 0.01
    0.010478289 = product of:
      0.041913155 = sum of:
        0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 4358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041913155 = score(doc=4358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 4358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4358)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Universität zu Köln, als eine der größten Hochschulen Deutschlands, nähert sich dem Thema universitätsweites systematisches Forschungsdatenmanagement (FDM) über eine Machbarkeitsstudie an. Im Laufe eines Jahres wurde der Status quo des Umgangs mit Forschungsdaten an der Universität, den Fakultäten, Instituten und Forschungsprojekten ermittelt. Als Grundlage für die weiteren Arbeiten wurde eine Leitlinie zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten erarbeitet und seitens der Universität verabschiedet. Ausgehend von einem umfänglichen FDM-Service-Portfolio wurden erste Maßnahmenpakete entwickelt, die mit einer realistischen Aufwandsabschätzung eine Grundlage für ein universitätsweites FDM innerhalb der nächsten drei Jahre legen sollen. Die Maßnahmen basieren im Wesentlichen auf dem Aufbau von Informations-, Beratungs- und Schulungsangeboten und sollen die Vernetzung der FDM-Akteure stärken. Ein weiteres Arbeitsgebiet liegt im Aufbau digitaler Services im Bereich Speicherung und Sichtbarmachung von Forschungsergebnissen.
  10. Ginther, C.; Lackner, K.: Predatory Publishing : Herausforderung für Wissenschaftler/innen und Bibliotheken (2019) 0.01
    0.010478289 = product of:
      0.041913155 = sum of:
        0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 5330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041913155 = score(doc=5330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 5330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5330)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Predatory Publishing ist seit der umfangreichen internationalen Medienberichterstattung im Sommer 2018 auch der breiten Öffentlichkeit ein Begriff. Zeitschriften, Radio und Fernsehen in zahlreichen Ländern, darunter auch im deutschen Sprachraum, berichteten über mehrere Wochen ausführlich zu diesen betrügerischen Geschäftspraktiken. Das Problem ist in Fachkreisen jedoch bereits seit einigen Jahren bekannt und nimmt seither immer stärker zu. Die Publikationsservices an der Universität Graz beraten und informieren seit 2017 die Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, aber auch die Studierenden zum Thema Predatory Publishing. Der folgende Beitrag bietet bietet im ersten Abschnitt wesentliche Informationen zu Predatory Publishing sowie damit in Zusammenhang stehend, auch die im Zuge der Medienkampagne 2018 kolportierten Themen Fake Science und Fake News, und wendet sich in den folgenden zwei Abschnitten der Praxis zu, wenn es zum einen um die Grundlagen der Auseinandersetzung mit Predatory Publishing an Universitäten geht und zum anderen die Aufklärungsarbeit und Services an der Universität Graz durch Mitarbeiter/innen der Universitätsbibliothek als Fallbeispiel aus der Praxis vorgestellt werden.
  11. Röthler, D.: "Lehrautomaten" oder die MOOC-Vision der späten 60er Jahre (2014) 0.01
    0.009532874 = product of:
      0.038131498 = sum of:
        0.038131498 = product of:
          0.076262996 = sum of:
            0.076262996 = weight(_text_:22 in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076262996 = score(doc=1552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2018 11:04:35
  12. Heller, L.: Ergebnisse der Benutzerumfrage "Literaturverwaltung - Was ich benutze und was ich brauche", TIB/UB Hannover 2011 (2011) 0.01
    0.008326744 = product of:
      0.033306975 = sum of:
        0.033306975 = product of:
          0.06661395 = sum of:
            0.06661395 = weight(_text_:management in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06661395 = score(doc=4884,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.42132655 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Raw data set (in CSV format) of a user survey about usage and needs regarding reference management software (like Endnote, Zotero, Citavi) in germany 2011. Participants were mainly college students, librarians, and other users of reference management software.
  13. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.01
    0.007944062 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = product of:
          0.0635525 = sum of:
            0.0635525 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0635525 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  14. Schönherr, M.: Bestechend brillant : die Schönheit der Algorithmen (2016) 0.01
    0.007944062 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = product of:
          0.0635525 = sum of:
            0.0635525 = weight(_text_:22 in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0635525 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 2.2016 17:22:23
  15. Häring, N.; Hensinger, P.: "Digitale Bildung" : Der abschüssige Weg zur Konditionierungsanstalt (2019) 0.01
    0.007944062 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = product of:
          0.0635525 = sum of:
            0.0635525 = weight(_text_:22 in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0635525 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2019 11:45:19
  16. Hartmann, S.; Haffner, A.: Linked-RDA-Data in der Praxis (2010) 0.01
    0.0063552503 = product of:
      0.025421001 = sum of:
        0.025421001 = product of:
          0.050842002 = sum of:
            0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050842002 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 2.2011 20:22:23
  17. Eckert, K.: SKOS: eine Sprache für die Übertragung von Thesauri ins Semantic Web (2011) 0.01
    0.0063552503 = product of:
      0.025421001 = sum of:
        0.025421001 = product of:
          0.050842002 = sum of:
            0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050842002 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2011 19:21:22
  18. Scheven, E.: Geokoordinaten in Bibliotheksdaten : Grundlage für innovative Nachnutzung (2015) 0.01
    0.0063552503 = product of:
      0.025421001 = sum of:
        0.025421001 = product of:
          0.050842002 = sum of:
            0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050842002 = score(doc=308,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    16.11.2015 18:22:47
  19. Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015) 0.01
    0.0063552503 = product of:
      0.025421001 = sum of:
        0.025421001 = product of:
          0.050842002 = sum of:
            0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050842002 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2016 15:58:46
  20. Lezius, W.: Morphy - Morphologie und Tagging für das Deutsche (2013) 0.01
    0.0063552503 = product of:
      0.025421001 = sum of:
        0.025421001 = product of:
          0.050842002 = sum of:
            0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050842002 = score(doc=1490,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1490, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1490)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2015 9:30:24

Types

  • a 38
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • m 1
  • More… Less…