-
Hyman, R.J.: Shelf access in libraries (1982)
0.01
0.009367674 = product of:
0.062451154 = sum of:
0.019048017 = weight(_text_:der in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019048017 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
0.029276319 = weight(_text_:des in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029276319 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
0.01412682 = weight(_text_:in in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01412682 = score(doc=3391,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36069193 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Schmidt, S.: Anmerkungen ... in Mitteilungsblatt: Verband der Bibliotheken des Landes NW N.F. 37(1987) S.24-35.
- Series
- ALA studies in librarianship; no.9
-
Rovelstad, M.V.: Open access to book collections : theory and practice in America (1985)
0.01
0.007799446 = product of:
0.051996306 = sum of:
0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02187783 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02187783 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008240645 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Source
- Die Buchaufstellung im Spannungsfeld von Bibliothek, Bibliothekar und Benützer
-
Pflug, G.: Classification in the libraries of the German Federal Republic (1982)
0.00
0.0034815238 = product of:
0.034815237 = sum of:
0.025397355 = weight(_text_:der in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025397355 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.00941788 = weight(_text_:in in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00941788 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986)
0.00
0.0025318495 = product of:
0.025318496 = sum of:
0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017077852 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008240645 = score(doc=1524,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
- Footnote
- Überarbeitete Version des IFLA-Vortrages, Chicago, 1985
