Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
-
Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017)
0.02
0.023355132 = product of: 0.035032697 = sum of: 0.014062456 = weight(_text_:m in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.014062456 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of: 0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of: 2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218) 0.051385287 = queryNorm 0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218) 0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081) 0.02097024 = product of: 0.04194048 = sum of: 0.04194048 = weight(_text_:de in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.04194048 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of: 0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of: 4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218) 0.051385287 = queryNorm 0.18992399 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218) 0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.ibi.hu-berlin.de/de/archiv/forschung/prom_habil/dissertationen/Tavakolizadeh-Ravari2007. Vgl. auch: http://mravari.blogfa.com/post-20.aspxgl.
-
Pulgarin, A.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Bibliometric analysis of the automatic indexing literature : 1956-2000 (2004)
0.01
0.009733732 = product of: 0.029201195 = sum of: 0.029201195 = product of: 0.11680478 = sum of: 0.11680478 = weight(_text_:authors in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.11680478 = score(doc=2566,freq=4.0), product of: 0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of: 4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218) 0.051385287 = queryNorm 0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2566) 0.25 = coord(1/4) 0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- We present a bibliometric study of a corpus of 839 bibliographic references about automatic indexing, covering the period 1956-2000. We analyse the distribution of authors and works, the obsolescence and its dispersion, and the distribution of the literature by topic, year, and source type. We conclude that: (i) there has been a constant interest on the part of researchers; (ii) the most studied topics were the techniques and methods employed and the general aspects of automatic indexing; (iii) the productivity of the authors does fit a Lotka distribution (Dmax=0.02 and critical value=0.054); (iv) the annual aging factor is 95%; and (v) the dispersion of the literature is low.