-
Mongin, L.; Fu, Y.Y.; Mostafa, J.: Open Archives data Service prototype and automated subject indexing using D-Lib archive content as a testbed (2003)
0.01
0.006374738 = product of:
0.012749476 = sum of:
0.012749476 = product of:
0.019124214 = sum of:
0.015528301 = weight(_text_:d in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015528301 = score(doc=1167,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.178113 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035959128 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 9(2003) no.12, x S
-
Junger, U.: Can indexing be automated? : the example of the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (2012)
0.01
0.0056684753 = product of:
0.011336951 = sum of:
0.011336951 = product of:
0.017005425 = sum of:
0.012810193 = weight(_text_:d in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012810193 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
0.004195232 = weight(_text_:s in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004195232 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Location
- D
- Source
- Cataloguing & Classification Quarterly 52(2014) no.1, S.102-109
-
Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017)
0.00
0.004249825 = product of:
0.00849965 = sum of:
0.00849965 = product of:
0.012749475 = sum of:
0.0103522 = weight(_text_:d in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0103522 = score(doc=3081,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.118742 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
0.0023972753 = weight(_text_:s in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0023972753 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
- Pages
- 128 S
-
Vinyals, O.; Toshev, A.; Bengio, S.; Erhan, D.: Show and tell : a neural image caption generator (2014)
0.00
0.004048911 = product of:
0.008097822 = sum of:
0.008097822 = product of:
0.012146732 = sum of:
0.009150138 = weight(_text_:d in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009150138 = score(doc=1869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 1869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029965942 = score(doc=1869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1869)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Vinyals, O.; Toshev, A.; Bengio, S.; Erhan, D.: ¬A picture is worth a thousand (coherent) words : building a natural description of images (2014)
0.00
0.0028342376 = product of:
0.0056684753 = sum of:
0.0056684753 = product of:
0.0085027125 = sum of:
0.0064050965 = weight(_text_:d in 1874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064050965 = score(doc=1874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 1874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1874)
0.002097616 = weight(_text_:s in 1874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002097616 = score(doc=1874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.04204337 = fieldWeight in 1874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1874)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gábor, K.; Zargayouna, H.; Tellier, I.; Buscaldi, D.; Charnois, T.: ¬A typology of semantic relations dedicated to scientific literature analysis (2016)
0.00
0.0021350323 = product of:
0.0042700646 = sum of:
0.0042700646 = product of:
0.012810193 = sum of:
0.012810193 = weight(_text_:d in 2933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012810193 = score(doc=2933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 2933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2933)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Donahue, J.; Hendricks, L.A.; Guadarrama, S.; Rohrbach, M.; Venugopalan, S.; Saenko, K.; Darrell, T.: Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description (2014)
0.00
7.0630404E-4 = product of:
0.0014126081 = sum of:
0.0014126081 = product of:
0.004237824 = sum of:
0.004237824 = weight(_text_:s in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004237824 = score(doc=1873,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Husevag, A.-S.R.: Named entities in indexing : a case study of TV subtitles and metadata records (2016)
0.00
4.994324E-4 = product of:
9.988648E-4 = sum of:
9.988648E-4 = product of:
0.0029965942 = sum of:
0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 3105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029965942 = score(doc=3105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3105)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.48-58
-
Markoff, J.: Researchers announce advance in image-recognition software (2014)
0.00
2.497162E-4 = product of:
4.994324E-4 = sum of:
4.994324E-4 = product of:
0.0014982971 = sum of:
0.0014982971 = weight(_text_:s in 1875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014982971 = score(doc=1875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045888513 = queryNorm
0.030030979 = fieldWeight in 1875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1875)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Computer vision specialists said that despite the improvements, these software systems had made only limited progress toward the goal of digitally duplicating human vision and, even more elusive, understanding. "I don't know that I would say this is 'understanding' in the sense we want," said John R. Smith, a senior manager at I.B.M.'s T.J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, N.Y. "I think even the ability to generate language here is very limited." But the Google and Stanford teams said that they expect to see significant increases in accuracy as they improve their software and train these programs with larger sets of annotated images. A research group led by Tamara L. Berg, a computer scientist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, is training a neural network with one million images annotated by humans. "You're trying to tell the story behind the image," she said. "A natural scene will be very complex, and you want to pick out the most important objects in the image.""
