-
Toepfer, M.; Seifert, C.: Content-based quality estimation for automatic subject indexing of short texts under precision and recall constraints
0.02
0.024133656 = sum of:
0.015122154 = product of:
0.060488615 = sum of:
0.060488615 = weight(_text_:authors in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060488615 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.009011503 = product of:
0.018023007 = sum of:
0.018023007 = weight(_text_:m in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018023007 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This is an authors' manuscript version of a paper accepted for proceedings of TPDL-2018, Porto, Portugal, Sept 10-13. The nal authenticated publication is available online at https://doi.org/will be added as soon as available.
-
Wolfe, EW.: a case study in automated metadata enhancement : Natural Language Processing in the humanities (2019)
0.01
0.010585507 = product of:
0.021171015 = sum of:
0.021171015 = product of:
0.08468406 = sum of:
0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 5236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08468406 = score(doc=5236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5236)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Black Book Interactive Project at the University of Kansas (KU) is developing an expanded corpus of novels by African American authors, with an emphasis on lesser known writers and a goal of expanding research in this field. Using a custom metadata schema with an emphasis on race-related elements, each novel is analyzed for a variety of elements such as literary style, targeted content analysis, historical context, and other areas. Librarians at KU have worked to develop a variety of computational text analysis processes designed to assist with specific aspects of this metadata collection, including text mining and natural language processing, automated subject extraction based on word sense disambiguation, harvesting data from Wikidata, and other actions.
-
Mao, J.; Xu, W.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yuille, A.L.: Explain images with multimodal recurrent neural networks (2014)
0.01
0.00936503 = product of:
0.01873006 = sum of:
0.01873006 = product of:
0.03746012 = sum of:
0.03746012 = weight(_text_:m in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03746012 = score(doc=1557,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.28572327 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we present a multimodal Recurrent Neural Network (m-RNN) model for generating novel sentence descriptions to explain the content of images. It directly models the probability distribution of generating a word given previous words and the image. Image descriptions are generated by sampling from this distribution. The model consists of two sub-networks: a deep recurrent neural network for sentences and a deep convolutional network for images. These two sub-networks interact with each other in a multimodal layer to form the whole m-RNN model. The effectiveness of our model is validated on three benchmark datasets (IAPR TC-12 [8], Flickr 8K [28], and Flickr 30K [13]). Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art generative method. In addition, the m-RNN model can be applied to retrieval tasks for retrieving images or sentences, and achieves significant performance improvement over the state-of-the-art methods which directly optimize the ranking objective function for retrieval.
-
Banerjee, K.; Johnson, M.: Improving access to archival collections with automated entity extraction (2015)
0.01
0.0054069017 = product of:
0.010813803 = sum of:
0.010813803 = product of:
0.021627607 = sum of:
0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 2144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021627607 = score(doc=2144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Donahue, J.; Hendricks, L.A.; Guadarrama, S.; Rohrbach, M.; Venugopalan, S.; Saenko, K.; Darrell, T.: Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description (2014)
0.00
0.0045057517 = product of:
0.009011503 = sum of:
0.009011503 = product of:
0.018023007 = sum of:
0.018023007 = weight(_text_:m in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018023007 = score(doc=1873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017)
0.00
0.0036046011 = product of:
0.0072092023 = sum of:
0.0072092023 = product of:
0.014418405 = sum of:
0.014418405 = weight(_text_:m in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014418405 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
