Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Martins, A.L.; Souza, R.R.; Ribeiro de Mello, H.: ¬The use of noun phrases in information retrieval : proposing a mechanism for automatic classification (2014) 0.02
    0.01866632 = product of:
      0.03733264 = sum of:
        0.03733264 = sum of:
          0.012499675 = weight(_text_:h in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012499675 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
          0.024832962 = weight(_text_:22 in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024832962 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045821942 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.02
    0.0155206015 = product of:
      0.031041203 = sum of:
        0.031041203 = product of:
          0.062082406 = sum of:
            0.062082406 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062082406 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  3. Mesquita, L.A.P.; Souza, R.R.; Baracho Porto, R.M.A.: Noun phrases in automatic indexing: : a structural analysis of the distribution of relevant terms in doctoral theses (2014) 0.01
    0.0062082405 = product of:
      0.012416481 = sum of:
        0.012416481 = product of:
          0.024832962 = sum of:
            0.024832962 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832962 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Greiner-Petter, A.; Schubotz, M.; Cohl, H.S.; Gipp, B.: Semantic preserving bijective mappings for expressions involving special functions between computer algebra systems and document preparation systems (2019) 0.01
    0.0062082405 = product of:
      0.012416481 = sum of:
        0.012416481 = product of:
          0.024832962 = sum of:
            0.024832962 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832962 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Gábor, K.; Zargayouna, H.; Tellier, I.; Buscaldi, D.; Charnois, T.: ¬A typology of semantic relations dedicated to scientific literature analysis (2016) 0.01
    0.005468608 = product of:
      0.010937216 = sum of:
        0.010937216 = product of:
          0.021874432 = sum of:
            0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 2933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021874432 = score(doc=2933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Cui, H.; Boufford, D.; Selden, P.: Semantic annotation of biosystematics literature without training examples (2010) 0.00
    0.004687378 = product of:
      0.009374756 = sum of:
        0.009374756 = product of:
          0.018749513 = sum of:
            0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 3422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018749513 = score(doc=3422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 3422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Munkelt, J.; Schaer, P.; Lepsky, K.: Towards an IR test collection for the German National Library (2018) 0.00
    0.004687378 = product of:
      0.009374756 = sum of:
        0.009374756 = product of:
          0.018749513 = sum of:
            0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018749513 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Automatic content indexing is one of the innovations that are increasingly changing the way libraries work. In theory, it promises a cataloguing service that would hardly be possible with humans in terms of speed, quantity and maybe quality. The German National Library (DNB) has also recognised this potential and is increasingly relying on the automatic indexing of their catalogue content. The DNB took a major step in this direction in 2017, which was announced in two papers. The announcement was rather restrained, but the content of the papers is all the more explosive for the library community: Since September 2017, the DNB has discontinued the intellectual indexing of series Band H and has switched to an automatic process for these series. The subject indexing of online publications (series O) has been purely automatical since 2010; from September 2017, monographs and periodicals published outside the publishing industry and university publications will no longer be indexed by people. This raises the question: What is the quality of the automatic indexing compared to the manual work or in other words to which degree can the automatic indexing replace people without a signi cant drop in regards to quality?