Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.02
    0.016782891 = product of:
      0.058740117 = sum of:
        0.043796096 = product of:
          0.17518438 = sum of:
            0.17518438 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17518438 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31170598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.01494402 = product of:
          0.02988804 = sum of:
            0.02988804 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02988804 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Qu, B.; Cong, G.; Li, C.; Sun, A.; Chen, H.: ¬An evaluation of classification models for question topic categorization (2012) 0.01
    0.0130688585 = product of:
      0.045741003 = sum of:
        0.01708833 = product of:
          0.03417666 = sum of:
            0.03417666 = weight(_text_:c in 237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03417666 = score(doc=237,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 237, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=237)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028652674 = weight(_text_:g in 237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028652674 = score(doc=237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=237)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    We study the problem of question topic classification using a very large real-world Community Question Answering (CQA) dataset from Yahoo! Answers. The dataset comprises 3.9 million questions and these questions are organized into more than 1,000 categories in a hierarchy. To the best knowledge, this is the first systematic evaluation of the performance of different classification methods on question topic classification as well as short texts. Specifically, we empirically evaluate the following in classifying questions into CQA categories: (a) the usefulness of n-gram features and bag-of-word features; (b) the performance of three standard classification algorithms (naive Bayes, maximum entropy, and support vector machines); (c) the performance of the state-of-the-art hierarchical classification algorithms; (d) the effect of training data size on performance; and (e) the effectiveness of the different components of CQA data, including subject, content, asker, and the best answer. The experimental results show what aspects are important for question topic classification in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency. We believe that the experimental findings from this study will be useful in real-world classification problems.
  3. Chae, G.; Park, J.; Park, J.; Yeo, W.S.; Shi, C.: Linking and clustering artworks using social tags : revitalizing crowd-sourced information on cultural collections (2016) 0.01
    0.011638842 = product of:
      0.040735945 = sum of:
        0.012083272 = product of:
          0.024166545 = sum of:
            0.024166545 = weight(_text_:c in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024166545 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028652674 = weight(_text_:g in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028652674 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  4. Pech, G.; Delgado, C.; Sorella, S.P.: Classifying papers into subfields using Abstracts, Titles, Keywords and KeyWords Plus through pattern detection and optimization procedures : an application in Physics (2022) 0.01
    0.011638842 = product of:
      0.040735945 = sum of:
        0.012083272 = product of:
          0.024166545 = sum of:
            0.024166545 = weight(_text_:c in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024166545 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028652674 = weight(_text_:g in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028652674 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  5. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.009814649 = product of:
      0.03435127 = sum of:
        0.01691658 = product of:
          0.03383316 = sum of:
            0.03383316 = weight(_text_:c in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03383316 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01743469 = product of:
          0.03486938 = sum of:
            0.03486938 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03486938 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  6. Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006) 0.01
    0.009814649 = product of:
      0.03435127 = sum of:
        0.01691658 = product of:
          0.03383316 = sum of:
            0.03383316 = weight(_text_:c in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03383316 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01743469 = product of:
          0.03486938 = sum of:
            0.03486938 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03486938 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:24:52
  7. Ru, C.; Tang, J.; Li, S.; Xie, S.; Wang, T.: Using semantic similarity to reduce wrong labels in distant supervision for relation extraction (2018) 0.01
    0.009674412 = product of:
      0.03386044 = sum of:
        0.012083272 = product of:
          0.024166545 = sum of:
            0.024166545 = weight(_text_:c in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024166545 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021777168 = weight(_text_:u in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021777168 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. McKiernan, G.: Automated categorisation of Web resources : a profile of selected projects, research, products, and services (1996) 0.01
    0.008186478 = product of:
      0.057305347 = sum of:
        0.057305347 = weight(_text_:g in 2533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057305347 = score(doc=2533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 2533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2533)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  9. Möller, G.: Automatic classification of the World Wide Web using Universal Decimal Classification (1999) 0.01
    0.008186478 = product of:
      0.057305347 = sum of:
        0.057305347 = weight(_text_:g in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057305347 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  10. Leroy, G.; Miller, T.; Rosemblat, G.; Browne, A.: ¬A balanced approach to health information evaluation : a vocabulary-based naïve Bayes classifier and readability formulas (2008) 0.01
    0.0069464575 = product of:
      0.0486252 = sum of:
        0.0486252 = weight(_text_:g in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0486252 = score(doc=1998,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.35212007 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  11. Hu, G.; Zhou, S.; Guan, J.; Hu, X.: Towards effective document clustering : a constrained K-means based approach (2008) 0.01
    0.005730535 = product of:
      0.040113743 = sum of:
        0.040113743 = weight(_text_:g in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040113743 = score(doc=2113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  12. Kanaan, G.; Al-Shalabi, R.; Ghwanmeh, S.; Al-Ma'adeed, H.: ¬A comparison of text-classification techniques applied to Arabic text (2009) 0.00
    0.004911887 = product of:
      0.034383208 = sum of:
        0.034383208 = weight(_text_:g in 3096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034383208 = score(doc=3096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 3096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3096)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  13. Ruiz, M.E.; Srinivasan, P.: Combining machine learning and hierarchical indexing structures for text categorization (2001) 0.00
    0.0043554334 = product of:
      0.030488033 = sum of:
        0.030488033 = weight(_text_:u in 1595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030488033 = score(doc=1595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1595)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Advances in classification research, vol.10: proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Ed.: Albrechtsen, H. u. J.E. Mai
  14. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.00
    0.00426972 = product of:
      0.02988804 = sum of:
        0.02988804 = product of:
          0.05977608 = sum of:
            0.05977608 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05977608 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
  15. Ma, Z.; Sun, A.; Cong, G.: On predicting the popularity of newly emerging hashtags in Twitter (2013) 0.00
    0.004093239 = product of:
      0.028652674 = sum of:
        0.028652674 = weight(_text_:g in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028652674 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  16. Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016) 0.00
    0.004093239 = product of:
      0.028652674 = sum of:
        0.028652674 = weight(_text_:g in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028652674 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13809267 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.20748875 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  17. Reiner, U.: DDC-based search in the data of the German National Bibliography (2008) 0.00
    0.0037332284 = product of:
      0.026132599 = sum of:
        0.026132599 = weight(_text_:u in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026132599 = score(doc=2166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  18. HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016) 0.00
    0.0035581004 = product of:
      0.024906702 = sum of:
        0.024906702 = product of:
          0.049813405 = sum of:
            0.049813405 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049813405 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12874968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  19. Miyamoto, S.: Information clustering based an fuzzy multisets (2003) 0.00
    0.0034176658 = product of:
      0.02392366 = sum of:
        0.02392366 = product of:
          0.04784732 = sum of:
            0.04784732 = weight(_text_:c in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04784732 = score(doc=1071,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12682222 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036766402 = queryNorm
                0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    A fuzzy multiset model for information clustering is proposed with application to information retrieval on the World Wide Web. Noting that a search engine retrieves multiple occurrences of the same subjects with possibly different degrees of relevance, we observe that fuzzy multisets provide an appropriate model of information retrieval on the WWW. Information clustering which means both term clustering and document clustering is considered. Three methods of the hard c-means, fuzzy c-means, and an agglomerative method using cluster centers are proposed. Two distances between fuzzy multisets and algorithms for calculating cluster centers are defined. Theoretical properties concerning the clustering algorithms are studied. Illustrative examples are given to show how the algorithms work.
  20. Golub, K.; Hansson, J.; Soergel, D.; Tudhope, D.: Managing classification in libraries : a methodological outline for evaluating automatic subject indexing and classification in Swedish library catalogues (2015) 0.00
    0.0031110242 = product of:
      0.021777168 = sum of:
        0.021777168 = weight(_text_:u in 2300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021777168 = score(doc=2300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120389536 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036766402 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2300)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro

Years