-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.23
0.2307443 = product of:
0.30765906 = sum of:
0.07228978 = product of:
0.21686934 = sum of:
0.21686934 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21686934 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21686934 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21686934 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38587612 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.018499935 = product of:
0.03699987 = sum of:
0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03699987 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Yao, H.; Etzkorn, L.H.; Virani, S.: Automated classification and retrieval of reusable software components (2008)
0.02
0.017135125 = product of:
0.0685405 = sum of:
0.0685405 = product of:
0.137081 = sum of:
0.137081 = weight(_text_:software in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.137081 = score(doc=1382,freq=24.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.75917953 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The authors describe their research which improves software reuse by using an automated approach to semantically search for and retrieve reusable software components in large software component repositories and on the World Wide Web (WWW). Using automation and smart (semantic) techniques, their approach speeds up the search and retrieval of reusable software components, while retaining good accuracy, and therefore improves the affordability of software reuse. A program understanding of software components and natural language understanding of user queries was employed. Then the software component descriptions were compared by matching the resulting semantic representations of the user queries to the semantic representations of the software components to search for software components that best match the user queries. A proof of concept system was developed to test the authors' approach. The results of this proof of concept system were compared to human experts, and statistical analysis was performed on the collected experimental data. The results from these experiments demonstrate that this automated semantic-based approach for software reusable component classification and retrieval is successful when compared to the labor-intensive results from the experts, thus showing that this approach can significantly benefit software reuse classification and retrieval.
-
Koch, T.; Ardö, A.: Automatic classification of full-text HTML-documents from one specific subject area : DESIRE II D3.6a, Working Paper 2 (2000)
0.01
0.013708099 = product of:
0.054832395 = sum of:
0.054832395 = product of:
0.10966479 = sum of:
0.10966479 = weight(_text_:software in 1667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10966479 = score(doc=1667,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.6073436 = fieldWeight in 1667, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1667)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- 1 Introduction / 2 Method overview / 3 Ei thesaurus preprocessing / 4 Automatic classification process: 4.1 Matching -- 4.2 Weighting -- 4.3 Preparation for display / 5 Results of the classification process / 6 Evaluations / 7 Software / 8 Other applications / 9 Experiments with universal classification systems / References / Appendix A: Ei classification service: Software / Appendix B: Use of the classification software as subject filter in a WWW harvester.
-
Adams, K.C.: Word wranglers : Automatic classification tools transform enterprise documents from "bags of words" into knowledge resources (2003)
0.01
0.011060675 = product of:
0.0442427 = sum of:
0.0442427 = product of:
0.0884854 = sum of:
0.0884854 = weight(_text_:software in 1665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0884854 = score(doc=1665,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.49004826 = fieldWeight in 1665, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1665)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Taxonomies are an important part of any knowledge management (KM) system, and automatic classification software is emerging as a "killer app" for consumer and enterprise portals. A number of companies such as Inxight Software , Mohomine, Metacode, and others claim to interpret the semantic content of any textual document and automatically classify text on the fly. The promise that software could automatically produce a Yahoo-style directory is a siren call not many IT managers are able to resist. KM needs have grown more complex due to the increasing amount of digital information, the declining effectiveness of keyword searching, and heterogeneous document formats in corporate databases. This environment requires innovative KM tools, and automatic classification technology is an example of this new kind of software. These products can be divided into three categories according to their underlying technology - rules-based, catalog-by-example, and statistical clustering. Evolving trends in this market include framing classification as a cyborg (computer- and human-based) activity and the increasing use of extensible markup language (XML) and support vector machine (SVM) technology. In this article, we'll survey the rapidly changing automatic classification software market and examine the features and capabilities of leading classification products.
-
Montesi, M.; Navarrete, T.: Classifying web genres in context : A case study documenting the web genres used by a software engineer (2008)
0.01
0.010281074 = product of:
0.041124295 = sum of:
0.041124295 = product of:
0.08224859 = sum of:
0.08224859 = weight(_text_:software in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08224859 = score(doc=2100,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This case study analyzes the Internet-based resources that a software engineer uses in his daily work. Methodologically, we studied the web browser history of the participant, classifying all the web pages he had seen over a period of 12 days into web genres. We interviewed him before and after the analysis of the web browser history. In the first interview, he spoke about his general information behavior; in the second, he commented on each web genre, explaining why and how he used them. As a result, three approaches allow us to describe the set of 23 web genres obtained: (a) the purposes they serve for the participant; (b) the role they play in the various work and search phases; (c) and the way they are used in combination with each other. Further observations concern the way the participant assesses quality of web-based resources, and his information behavior as a software engineer.
-
Sebastiani, F.: Classification of text, automatic (2006)
0.01
0.009793539 = product of:
0.039174154 = sum of:
0.039174154 = product of:
0.07834831 = sum of:
0.07834831 = weight(_text_:software in 5003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07834831 = score(doc=5003,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18056466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 5003, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5003)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Automatic text classification (ATC) is a discipline at the crossroads of information retrieval (IR), machine learning (ML), and computational linguistics (CL), and consists in the realization of text classifiers, i.e. software systems capable of assigning texts to one or more categories, or classes, from a predefined set. Applications range from the automated indexing of scientific articles, to e-mail routing, spam filtering, authorship attribution, and automated survey coding. This article will focus on the ML approach to ATC, whereby a software system (called the learner) automatically builds a classifier for the categories of interest by generalizing from a "training" set of pre-classified texts.
-
Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001)
0.01
0.0092499675 = product of:
0.03699987 = sum of:
0.03699987 = product of:
0.07399974 = sum of:
0.07399974 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07399974 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 5. 5.2003 14:17:22
-
Automatic classification research at OCLC (2002)
0.01
0.005395815 = product of:
0.02158326 = sum of:
0.02158326 = product of:
0.04316652 = sum of:
0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04316652 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 5. 5.2003 9:22:09
-
Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006)
0.01
0.005395815 = product of:
0.02158326 = sum of:
0.02158326 = product of:
0.04316652 = sum of:
0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04316652 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:24:52
-
Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007)
0.01
0.005395815 = product of:
0.02158326 = sum of:
0.02158326 = product of:
0.04316652 = sum of:
0.04316652 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04316652 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2008 18:31:54
-
Liu, R.-L.: Context recognition for hierarchical text classification (2009)
0.00
0.0046249838 = product of:
0.018499935 = sum of:
0.018499935 = product of:
0.03699987 = sum of:
0.03699987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03699987 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:11:54
-
Mengle, S.; Goharian, N.: Passage detection using text classification (2009)
0.00
0.0038541534 = product of:
0.015416614 = sum of:
0.015416614 = product of:
0.030833228 = sum of:
0.030833228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030833228 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:14:43
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Ng, K.; Ou, S.: ¬An exploratory study of human clustering of Web pages (2003)
0.00
0.0030833227 = product of:
0.012333291 = sum of:
0.012333291 = product of:
0.024666581 = sum of:
0.024666581 = weight(_text_:22 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024666581 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15938555 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045514934 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 9:56:22
