Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.01
    0.012492228 = product of:
      0.024984457 = sum of:
        0.024984457 = product of:
          0.049968913 = sum of:
            0.049968913 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049968913 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052687407 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  2. Pathak, L.P.: Concept-term relationship and a classified schedule of isolates for the term 'concept' (2000) 0.01
    0.010585799 = product of:
      0.021171598 = sum of:
        0.021171598 = product of:
          0.08468639 = sum of:
            0.08468639 = weight(_text_:authors in 6046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08468639 = score(doc=6046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052687407 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 6046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6046)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Draws attention to the efforts to define the terms 'concept' and 'term' and suggests a schedule of isolates for the term 'concept' under eight headings: 0. Concept; 1. Theoretical aspects; 2. Learning theory and Psychological aspects; 3. Origin, evolution, formation, construction; 4. Semantic aspects; 5.Terms and Terminology; 6. Usage and discipline-specific applications; and 7. Concepts and ISAR systems. The schedule also includes about 150 aspects/isolate terms related to 'concept' along with the name of the authors who have used them. The schedule is intended to help in identifying the various aspects of a concept with the help of the terms used for them. These aspects may guide to some extent, in dissecting and seeing the social science concepts from various point of views
  3. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.01
    0.00892302 = product of:
      0.01784604 = sum of:
        0.01784604 = product of:
          0.03569208 = sum of:
            0.03569208 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03569208 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052687407 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  4. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.01
    0.00892302 = product of:
      0.01784604 = sum of:
        0.01784604 = product of:
          0.03569208 = sum of:
            0.03569208 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03569208 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052687407 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  5. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.01
    0.00892302 = product of:
      0.01784604 = sum of:
        0.01784604 = product of:
          0.03569208 = sum of:
            0.03569208 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03569208 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052687407 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.00892302 = product of:
      0.01784604 = sum of:
        0.01784604 = product of:
          0.03569208 = sum of:
            0.03569208 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03569208 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052687407 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22
  7. Machado, L.M.O.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Simões, M.da Graça de Melo: Concept theory in library and information science : an epistemological analysis (2019) 0.01
    0.007561285 = product of:
      0.01512257 = sum of:
        0.01512257 = product of:
          0.06049028 = sum of:
            0.06049028 = weight(_text_:authors in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06049028 = score(doc=5457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052687407 = queryNorm
                0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the literature on concept theory in library and information science (LIS) from an epistemological perspective, ascribing each paper to an epistemological family and discussing their relevance in the context of the knowledge organization (KO) domain. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a hermeneutic approach for the analysis of the texts that compose the corpus of study following contingency and categorical analyses. More specifically, the paper works with Bardin's contingency analysis and follows Hjørland's families of epistemologies for the categorization. Findings The analysis corroborates the observations made for the last ten years about the scarcity of studies on concept theory in LIS and KO. However, the study also reveals an epistemological turn on concept theory since 2009 that could be considered a departure from the rationalist views that dominated the field and a continuation of a broader paradigm shift in LIS and KO. All analyzed papers except two follow pragmatist or historicist approaches. Originality/value This paper follows-up and systematizes the contributions to the LIS and KO fields on concept theory mainly during the last decade. The epistemological analysis reveals the dominant views in this paradigm shift and the main authors and trends that are present in the LIS literature on concept theory.