Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Khoo, C.; Chan, S.; Niu, Y.: ¬The many facets of the cause-effect relation (2002) 0.01
    0.0050465697 = product of:
      0.045419127 = sum of:
        0.045419127 = weight(_text_:wide in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045419127 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1546338 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034900077 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter presents a broad survey of the cause-effect relation, with particular emphasis an how the relation is expressed in text. Philosophers have been grappling with the concept of causation for centuries. Researchers in social psychology have found that the human mind has a very complex mechanism for identifying and attributing the cause for an event. Inferring cause-effect relations between events and statements has also been found to be an important part of reading and text comprehension, especially for narrative text. Though many of the cause-effect relations in text are implied and have to be inferred by the reader, there is also a wide variety of linguistic expressions for explicitly indicating cause and effect. In addition, it has been found that certain words have "causal valence"-they bias the reader to attribute cause in certain ways. Cause-effect relations can also be divided into several different types.
  2. Barsalou, L.W.: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields (1992) 0.00
    0.004205475 = product of:
      0.037849274 = sum of:
        0.037849274 = weight(_text_:wide in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037849274 = score(doc=3217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1546338 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034900077 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    In this chapter I propose that frames provide the fundamental representation of knowledge in human cognition. In the first section, I raise problems with the feature list representations often found in theories of knowledge, and I sketch the solutions that frames provide to them. In the second section, I examine the three fundamental concepts of frames: attribute-value sets, structural invariants, and constraints. Because frames also represents the attributes, values, structural invariants, and constraints within a frame, the mechanism that constructs frames builds them recursively. The frame theory I propose borrows heavily from previous frame theories, although its collection of representational components is somewhat unique. Furthermore, frame theorists generally assume that frames are rigid configurations of independent attributes, whereas I propose that frames are dynamic relational structures whose form is flexible and context dependent. In the third section, I illustrate how frames support a wide variety of representational tasks central to conceptual processing in natural and artificial intelligence. Frames can represent exemplars and propositions, prototypes and membership, subordinates and taxonomies. Frames can also represent conceptual combinations, event sequences, rules, and plans. In the fourth section, I show how frames define the extent of conceptual fields and how they provide a powerful productive mechanism for generating specific concepts within a field.
  3. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.00
    0.0035184738 = product of:
      0.031666264 = sum of:
        0.031666264 = product of:
          0.047499396 = sum of:
            0.023857003 = weight(_text_:29 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023857003 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12276756 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034900077 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
            0.023642393 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023642393 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12221412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034900077 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.29-54
  4. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.00
    0.0012259019 = product of:
      0.011033117 = sum of:
        0.011033117 = product of:
          0.03309935 = sum of:
            0.03309935 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03309935 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12221412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034900077 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  5. Gnoli, C.: Progress in synthetic classification : towards unique definition of concepts (2007) 0.00
    8.835927E-4 = product of:
      0.007952334 = sum of:
        0.007952334 = product of:
          0.023857003 = sum of:
            0.023857003 = weight(_text_:29 in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023857003 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12276756 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034900077 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.167-182
  6. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.00
    8.756442E-4 = product of:
      0.007880798 = sum of:
        0.007880798 = product of:
          0.023642393 = sum of:
            0.023642393 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023642393 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12221412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034900077 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  7. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.00
    8.756442E-4 = product of:
      0.007880798 = sum of:
        0.007880798 = product of:
          0.023642393 = sum of:
            0.023642393 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023642393 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12221412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034900077 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  8. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.00
    8.756442E-4 = product of:
      0.007880798 = sum of:
        0.007880798 = product of:
          0.023642393 = sum of:
            0.023642393 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023642393 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12221412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034900077 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22