-
Principles of semantic networks : explorations in the representation of knowledge (1991)
0.01
0.007936895 = product of:
0.07936895 = sum of:
0.008819038 = weight(_text_:in in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008819038 = score(doc=1677,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.30057663 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.06656595 = weight(_text_:einzelnen in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06656595 = score(doc=1677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1139978 = queryWeight, product of:
5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.5839231 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.003983958 = weight(_text_:s in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003983958 = score(doc=1677,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Abstract
- Enthält 3 thematische Sektionen: (1) Issues in knowledge representation; (2) formal analyses; (3) systems for knowledge representation
- Content
- Vgl. für die einzelnen Beiträge: IC 19(1992) no.4, S. 244 (4-330)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization. 20(1993) no.1, S.60-61 (O. Sechser)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Rahmstorf, G.: ¬An integrated conceptual representation for words and phrases (1992)
0.01
0.005669364 = product of:
0.08504045 = sum of:
0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0028170836 = score(doc=2415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
0.08222336 = weight(_text_:stuttgart in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08222336 = score(doc=2415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1266975 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8738413 = idf(docFreq=337, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.6489739 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8738413 = idf(docFreq=337, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Pages
- S.161-176
- Source
- Discourse and lexical meaning. Proceedings of a Workshop of the DFG Sonderforschungsbereich 340, Stuttgart, 30.11.-1.12.1992. Ed.: P. Bosch u. P. Gerstl
-
Mental images in human cognition (1991)
0.00
0.0010846704 = product of:
0.016270056 = sum of:
0.010692515 = weight(_text_:in in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010692515 = score(doc=4085,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.3644298 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
0.0055775414 = weight(_text_:s in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055775414 = score(doc=4085,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library quarterly 63(1993) no.1, S.108-110.
- Series
- Advances in psychology; no.80
- Type
- s
-
¬The role of formal ontology in the information technology (1995)
0.00
8.535331E-4 = product of:
0.012802996 = sum of:
0.008819038 = weight(_text_:in in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008819038 = score(doc=4746,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.30057663 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
0.003983958 = weight(_text_:s in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003983958 = score(doc=4746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- A special issue devoted to the role of formal ontology in information technology. Papers were given at the International Workshop on Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation, held in Padova, Iatly, Mar 95
- Source
- International journal of human-computer studies. 43(1995) nos.5/6, S.623-965
- Type
- s
-
Jorna, R.J.: Knowledge representation and symbols in the mind : an analysis in cognitive psychology (1990)
0.00
8.4495463E-4 = product of:
0.012674319 = sum of:
0.008730402 = weight(_text_:in in 7305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008730402 = score(doc=7305,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 7305, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7305)
0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 7305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003943917 = score(doc=7305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 7305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7305)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Pages
- VIII,237 S
-
Kageura, K.: Terminological semantics : an examination of 'concept' and 'meaning' in the study of terms (1995)
0.00
8.15418E-4 = product of:
0.01223127 = sum of:
0.009977602 = weight(_text_:in in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009977602 = score(doc=4561,freq=16.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.34006363 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002253667 = score(doc=4561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The importance of 'concept' in the study of terms is recognized by most researchers in the field of terminological research. However, the theoretical status of 'concept' in the study of terms has not been clarified so far. Against this background, the status of 'concept' in the study of terms is theoretically examined in comparison with the status of 'meaning' in the semantic study of general languages. Sketches a possible scheme by which 'concept' and 'meaning' are properly plyced in the theoretical study of terms
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 20(1995) no.4, S.25-31
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.00
8.133591E-4 = product of:
0.012200386 = sum of:
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.010228428 = product of:
0.020456856 = sum of:
0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020456856 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
- Source
- European journal of cognitive psychology. 6(1994) no.1, S.43-75
-
Nelson, S.J.: From meaning to term : semantic locality in the UMLS metathesaurus (1992)
0.00
7.242469E-4 = product of:
0.010863703 = sum of:
0.007483202 = weight(_text_:in in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007483202 = score(doc=5611,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033805002 = score(doc=5611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Pages
- S.209-213
- Source
- Assessing the value of medical informatics: Proc. of the 15th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, DC, Nov.1991
-
Alexander, P.A.; Schallert, D.L.; Hare, V.C.: Coming to terms : how researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge (1991)
0.00
6.7448284E-4 = product of:
0.010117242 = sum of:
0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 5673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061733257 = score(doc=5673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5673)
0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 5673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003943917 = score(doc=5673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 5673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5673)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- Review of educational research. 61(1991) no.3, S.315-343
-
Sager, J.C.; Ndi-Kimbi, A.: ¬The conceptual structure of terminological definitions and their realisations : a report on research in progress (1995)
0.00
6.7448284E-4 = product of:
0.010117242 = sum of:
0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 7579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061733257 = score(doc=7579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 7579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7579)
0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 7579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003943917 = score(doc=7579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 7579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7579)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- Terminology. 2(1995) no.1, S.61-81
-
Sager, J.C.; L'Homme, M.-C.: ¬A model for the definition of concepts : rules for analytical definitions in terminological databases (1994)
0.00
6.7448284E-4 = product of:
0.010117242 = sum of:
0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061733257 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003943917 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- Terminology. 1(1994) no.2, S.351-373
-
Priß, U.: Relational concept analysis : semantic structures in dictionaries and lexical databases (1998)
0.00
6.7448284E-4 = product of:
0.010117242 = sum of:
0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061733257 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003943917 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Pages
- 117 S
-
Conceptual structures : theory, tools and applications. 6th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS'98, Montpellier, France, August, 10-12, 1998, Proceedings (1998)
0.00
6.198117E-4 = product of:
0.009297175 = sum of:
0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006110009 = score(doc=1378,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
0.0031871665 = weight(_text_:s in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031871665 = score(doc=1378,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS'98, held in Montpellier, France, in August 1998. The 20 revised full papers and 10 research reports presented were carefully selected from a total of 66 submissions; also included are three invited contributions. The volume is divided in topical sections on knowledge representation and knowledge engineering, tools, conceptual graphs and other models, relationships with logics, algorithms and complexity, natural language processing, and applications.
- Pages
- XIII,439 S
- Type
- s
-
Weissenhofer, P.: Conceptology in terminology : theory, semantics, and word-formation. A morpho-conceptually based approach to classification as exemplified by the English baseball terminology (1995)
0.00
5.575784E-4 = product of:
0.008363675 = sum of:
0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006110009 = score(doc=4632,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002253667 = score(doc=4632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This dissertation from the University of Vienna contains the following chapters: (1) Conceptological aspects in terminology theory. Post-Wüsterian sign models and the four-field model. Vagueness, prototypes, and the four-field model. Morphological aspects of terminology and prototype theory. Word-formation and its role in terminology theory and conceptology. (2) A morpho-conceptual classification system of the English baseball terminology. The classification system. Statistical results. Conclusions
- Pages
- XI,270 S
-
Hudon, M.: Preparing terminological definitions for indexing and retrieval thesauri : a model (1996)
0.00
5.575784E-4 = product of:
0.008363675 = sum of:
0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 5193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006110009 = score(doc=5193,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5193, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5193)
0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 5193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002253667 = score(doc=5193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5193)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- A model for standardizing existing definitions and/or writing new definitions for thesaurus descriptors has been developed, within the framework of a research project concerned with the usefulness of terminological definitions for indexers working with a thesaurus. The proposed model is an expansion of a model presented by Sager and L'Homme in 1994. Examples of its application in a thesaurus describing the field of Adult literacy programming and training are introduced
- Pages
- S.363-369
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
-
Garcia Marco, F.J.; Esteban Navarro, M.A.: On some contributions of the cognitive sciences and epistemology to a theory of classification (1993)
0.00
5.447262E-4 = product of:
0.0081708925 = sum of:
0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064806426 = score(doc=5876,freq=12.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Intended is first of all a preliminary review of the implications that the new approaches to the theory of classification, mainly from cognitive psychology and epistemology may have for information work and research. As a secondary topic the scientific relations existing among information science, epistemology and the cognitive sciences are discussed. Classification is seen as a central activity in all daily and scientific activities, and, of course, of knowledge organization in information services. There is a mutual implication between classification and conceptualization, as the former moves in a natural way to the latter and the best result elaborated for classification is the concept. Research in concept theory is a need for a theory of classification. In this direction it is of outstanding importance to integrate the achievements of 'natural concept formation theory' (NCFT) as an alternative approach to conceptualization different from the traditional one of logicians and problem solving researchers. In conclusion both approaches are seen as being complementary: the NCFT approach being closer to the user and the logical one being more suitable for experts, including 'expert systems'
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 20(1993) no.3, S.126-132
-
Kolmayer, E.; Lavandier, J.; Roger, D.: Conceptual maps : users navigation through paradigmatic and syntagmatic links (1998)
0.00
5.43019E-4 = product of:
0.008145284 = sum of:
0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061733257 = score(doc=58,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This experiment, focused on the users behaviour, aims to study the search topic representation they build and to highlight the role of a graphical thesaurus on their mental models and searching behaviour. The users expertise in the field is considered. The results show how difficult it is to structure a field; they also point out how much a graphical thesaurus could contribute to such a task, but also its restricted role in the query task. They urge us to think over which shape is proper to the conceptual interface and the variety of links that have to be taken into account
- Pages
- S.372-378
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Nakamura, Y.: Subdivisions vs. conjunctions : a discussion on concept theory (1998)
0.00
5.43019E-4 = product of:
0.008145284 = sum of:
0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061733257 = score(doc=69,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=69,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- After studying the relations between two words(nouns) that constitute a compound term, the relation between corresponding concepts discussed. The impossibility of having a conjunction between two concepts that have no common feature causes inconvenience in the application of concept theory to information retrieval problems. Another kind of conjunctions, different from that by co-occurrence, is proposed and characteristics of this conjunction is studied. It revealed that one of new ones has the same character with colon combination in UDC. The possibility of having three kinds of conjunction including Wsterian concept conjunction is presented. It is also discussed that subdivisions can be replaced by new conjunctions
- Pages
- S.343-350
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Barsalou, L.W.: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields (1992)
0.00
5.3485465E-4 = product of:
0.00802282 = sum of:
0.006614278 = weight(_text_:in in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006614278 = score(doc=3217,freq=18.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014085418 = score(doc=3217,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- In this chapter I propose that frames provide the fundamental representation of knowledge in human cognition. In the first section, I raise problems with the feature list representations often found in theories of knowledge, and I sketch the solutions that frames provide to them. In the second section, I examine the three fundamental concepts of frames: attribute-value sets, structural invariants, and constraints. Because frames also represents the attributes, values, structural invariants, and constraints within a frame, the mechanism that constructs frames builds them recursively. The frame theory I propose borrows heavily from previous frame theories, although its collection of representational components is somewhat unique. Furthermore, frame theorists generally assume that frames are rigid configurations of independent attributes, whereas I propose that frames are dynamic relational structures whose form is flexible and context dependent. In the third section, I illustrate how frames support a wide variety of representational tasks central to conceptual processing in natural and artificial intelligence. Frames can represent exemplars and propositions, prototypes and membership, subordinates and taxonomies. Frames can also represent conceptual combinations, event sequences, rules, and plans. In the fourth section, I show how frames define the extent of conceptual fields and how they provide a powerful productive mechanism for generating specific concepts within a field.
- Pages
- S.21-74
- Source
- Frames, fields and contrasts: new essays in semantic and lexical organization. Eds.: A. Lehrer u. E.F. Kittay
-
Sowa, J.F.: Top-level ontological categories (1995)
0.00
4.8283124E-4 = product of:
0.007242468 = sum of:
0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004988801 = score(doc=4743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002253667 = score(doc=4743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Surveys ontological questions that arise in artificial intelligence, some of the answers that have been proposed by various philosophers, and an application of the philosophical analysis to the clarification of some current issues in artificial intelligence. Charles Sanders Peirce and Alfred North Whitehead have developed the most complete systems of categories. Their analyses suggest a basic structure of categories that can provide some guidelines for the design of artificial intelligence systems
- Source
- International journal of human-computer studies. 43(1995) nos.5/6, S.669-685
