Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.027736563 = product of:
      0.055473126 = sum of:
        0.055473126 = sum of:
          0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019999579 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035473548 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22
    Source
    Library trends. 56(2007) no.2, S.509-541
  2. Bonnevie, E.: Dretske's semantic information theory and meta-theories in library and information science (2001) 0.01
    0.009999789 = product of:
      0.019999579 = sum of:
        0.019999579 = product of:
          0.039999157 = sum of:
            0.039999157 = weight(_text_:library in 4484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039999157 = score(doc=4484,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 4484, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents the semantic information theory, formulated by the philosopher Fred I. Dretske, as a contribution to the discussion of metatheories and their practical implications in the field of library and information science. Dretske's theory is described in Knowledge and the flow of information. It is founded on mathematical communication theory but developed and elaborated into a cognitive, functionalistic theory, is individually oriented, and deals with the content of information. The topics are: the information process from perception to cognition, and how concept formation takes place in terms of digitisation. Other important issues are the concepts of information and knowledge, truth and meaning. Semantic information theory can be used as a frame of reference in order to explain, clarify and refute concepts currently used in library and information science, and as the basis for critical reviews of elements of the cognitive viewpoint in IR, primarily the notion of "potential information". The main contribution of the theory lies in a clarification of concepts, but there are still problems regarding the practical applications. More research is needed to combine philosophical discussions with the practice of information and library science.
  3. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.01
    0.008868387 = product of:
      0.017736774 = sum of:
        0.017736774 = product of:
          0.035473548 = sum of:
            0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035473548 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  4. McCray, A.T.; Bodenreider, O.: ¬A conceptual framework for the biomedical domain (2002) 0.01
    0.0059998734 = product of:
      0.011999747 = sum of:
        0.011999747 = product of:
          0.023999494 = sum of:
            0.023999494 = weight(_text_:library in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023999494 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Specialized domains often come with an extensive terminology, suitable for storing and exchanging information, but not necessarily for knowledge processing. Knowledge structures such as semantic networks, or ontologies, are required to explore the semantics of a domain. The UMLS project at the National Library of Medicine is a research effort to develop knowledge-based resources for the biomedical domain. The Metathesaurus is a large body of knowledge that defines and inter-relates 730,000 biomedical concepts, and the Semantic Network defines the semantic principles that apply to this domain. This chapter presents these two knowledge sources and illustrates through a research study how they can collaborate to further structure the domain. The limits of the approach are discussed.