Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01

0.0124500245 = product of:
  0.024900049 = sum of:
    0.024900049 = product of:
      0.049800098 = sum of:
        0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049800098 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 29. 7.1998 10:57:22

Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.01
```
0.010893771 = product of:
  0.021787543 = sum of:
    0.021787543 = product of:
      0.043575086 = sum of:
        0.043575086 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043575086 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.

Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01

0.010893771 = product of:
  0.021787543 = sum of:
    0.021787543 = product of:
      0.043575086 = sum of:
        0.043575086 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043575086 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71

Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.01

0.010893771 = product of:
  0.021787543 = sum of:
    0.021787543 = product of:
      0.043575086 = sum of:
        0.043575086 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043575086 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Zink, D.: Monitoring user search success through transaction log analysis : the WolfPAC example (1991) 0.01

0.0073292386 = product of:
  0.014658477 = sum of:
    0.014658477 = product of:
      0.029316954 = sum of:
        0.029316954 = weight(_text_:d in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029316954 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Ostroff, D.; Shneiderman, B.: Selection devices for user of an electronic encyclopedia : an empirical comparison of four possibilities (1988) 0.00

0.0036646193 = product of:
  0.0073292386 = sum of:
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014658477 = score(doc=816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Senzig, D.: Library catalogs for library users (1984) 0.00

0.0036646193 = product of:
  0.0073292386 = sum of:
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014658477 = score(doc=831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Solomon, P.: On the dynamics of information system use : from novice to? (1992) 0.00

0.0036646193 = product of:
  0.0073292386 = sum of:
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 4519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014658477 = score(doc=4519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 4519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4519)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Pittsburgh, 26.-29.10.92. Ed.: D. Shaw

Zeitlyn, D.; Bex, J.; David, M.: Making sense of online information (1997) 0.00

0.0027484642 = product of:
  0.0054969285 = sum of:
    0.0054969285 = product of:
      0.010993857 = sum of:
        0.010993857 = weight(_text_:d in 1098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010993857 = score(doc=1098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 1098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1098)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

De Rosa, C.; Cantrell, J.; Cellentani, D.; Hawk, J.; Jenkins, L.; Wilson, A.: Perceptions of libraries and information resources : A Report to the OCLC Membership (2005) 0.00

0.0027484642 = product of:
  0.0054969285 = sum of:
    0.0054969285 = product of:
      0.010993857 = sum of:
        0.010993857 = weight(_text_:d in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010993857 = score(doc=5018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Kules, B.; Capra, R.: Influence of training and stage of search on gaze behavior in a library catalog faceted search interface (2012) 0.00
```
0.002290387 = product of:
  0.004580774 = sum of:
    0.004580774 = product of:
      0.009161548 = sum of:
        0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009161548 = score(doc=4129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045945734 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

This study examined how searchers interact with a web-based, faceted library catalog when conducting exploratory searches. It applied multiple methods, including eye tracking and stimulated recall interviews, to investigate important aspects of faceted search interface use, specifically: (a) searcher gaze behavior-what components of the interface searchers look at; (b) how gaze behavior differs when training is and is not provided; (c) how gaze behavior changes as searchers become familiar with the interface; and (d) how gaze behavior differs depending on the stage of the search process. The results confirm previous findings that facets account for approximately 10-30% of interface use. They show that providing a 60-second video demonstration increased searcher use of facets. However, searcher use of the facets did not evolve during the study session, which suggests that searchers may not, on their own, rapidly apply the faceted interfaces. The findings also suggest that searcher use of interface elements varied by the stage of their search during the session, with higher use of facets during decision-making stages. These findings will be of interest to librarians and interface designers who wish to maximize the value of faceted searching for patrons, as well as to researchers who study search behavior.

Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types