Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Lewandowski, D.; Kerkmann, F.; Rümmele, S.; Sünkler, S.: ¬An empirical investigation on search engine ad disclosure (2018) 0.01
    0.006696287 = product of:
      0.013392574 = sum of:
        0.013392574 = product of:
          0.04017772 = sum of:
            0.04017772 = weight(_text_:12 in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04017772 = score(doc=4115,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.30251637 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 2.2018 19:12:16
  2. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Rahman, T.: Design criteria for children's Web portals : the users speak out (2002) 0.01
    0.0065057995 = product of:
      0.013011599 = sum of:
        0.013011599 = product of:
          0.039034795 = sum of:
            0.039034795 = weight(_text_:22 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039034795 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2005 10:34:22
  3. Bilal, D.: Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine : III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks (2002) 0.01
    0.0065057995 = product of:
      0.013011599 = sum of:
        0.013011599 = product of:
          0.039034795 = sum of:
            0.039034795 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039034795 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.
  4. Su, L.T.: ¬A comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines : Il. An evaluation by undergraduates (2003) 0.01
    0.0054214997 = product of:
      0.010842999 = sum of:
        0.010842999 = product of:
          0.032528996 = sum of:
            0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032528996 = score(doc=2117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 1.2004 18:27:22
  5. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.01
    0.0054214997 = product of:
      0.010842999 = sum of:
        0.010842999 = product of:
          0.032528996 = sum of:
            0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032528996 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  6. Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Moss, N.: ¬The role of individual differences in Internet searching : an empirical study (2001) 0.00
    0.0040585627 = product of:
      0.008117125 = sum of:
        0.008117125 = product of:
          0.024351375 = sum of:
            0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 6978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024351375 = score(doc=6978,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 6978, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6978)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.12, S.1049-1066
  7. Bilal, D.; Wang, P.: Children's conceptual structures of science categories and the design of Web directories (2005) 0.00
    0.0040585627 = product of:
      0.008117125 = sum of:
        0.008117125 = product of:
          0.024351375 = sum of:
            0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024351375 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.12, S.1303-1315
  8. Bar-Ilan, J.; Keenoy, K.; Yaari, E.; Levene, M.: User rankings of search engine results (2007) 0.00
    0.0033821356 = product of:
      0.0067642713 = sum of:
        0.0067642713 = product of:
          0.020292813 = sum of:
            0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020292813 = score(doc=470,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 470, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=470)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this study, we investigate the similarities and differences between rankings of search results by users and search engines. Sixty-seven students took part in a 3-week-long experiment, during which they were asked to identify and rank the top 10 documents from the set of URLs that were retrieved by three major search engines (Google, MSN Search, and Yahoo!) for 12 selected queries. The URLs and accompanying snippets were displayed in random order, without disclosing which search engine(s) retrieved any specific URL for the query. We computed the similarity of the rankings of the users and search engines using four nonparametric correlation measures in [0,1] that complement each other. The findings show that the similarities between the users' choices and the rankings of the search engines are low. We examined the effects of the presentation order of the results, and of the thinking styles of the participants. Presentation order influences the rankings, but overall the results indicate that there is no "average user," and even if the users have the same basic knowledge of a topic, they evaluate information in their own context, which is influenced by cognitive, affective, and physical factors. This is the first large-scale experiment in which users were asked to rank the results of identical queries. The analysis of the experimental results demonstrates the potential for personalized search.