Search (437 results, page 1 of 22)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.00
    0.0040966556 = product of:
      0.0368699 = sum of:
        0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050667557 = score(doc=1628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
        0.031803142 = product of:
          0.04770471 = sum of:
            0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023960123 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
            0.023744587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023744587 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a dramatic shift from subject to periodical title searching at Colorado University Libraries. States possible reasons for the change, examines problems encountered by users with searching the periodical title index and suggests how this change in online catalogue searching may affect future catalogue design and bibliographic instruction
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  2. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.00
    0.0040966556 = product of:
      0.0368699 = sum of:
        0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050667557 = score(doc=3687,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
        0.031803142 = product of:
          0.04770471 = sum of:
            0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023960123 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
            0.023744587 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023744587 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  3. Berger, F.C.; Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Van der Weide, T.P.: Supporting query by navigation (1996) 0.00
    0.00330214 = product of:
      0.01981284 = sum of:
        0.004433411 = weight(_text_:in in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004433411 = score(doc=6966,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
        0.008453923 = weight(_text_:der in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008453923 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
        0.0069255047 = product of:
          0.020776514 = sum of:
            0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020776514 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the technique used to study hypertext systems from a very general point of view, focus on monitoring searchers' behaviour, predict the estimation of the ultimate goals of the searchers, and estimate the searchers' determination to find these goals. The components are combined via a Markov chain approach so as to study information retrieval in general and hypertext (hypermedia) in particular. Demonstrates how these estimations can be used to assist searchers during their searching process and presents the derivation of a relevance function for documents, based on these estimations
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  4. Carlyle, A.: Matching LSCH and user vocabulary in the library catalog (1989) 0.00
    0.0024547304 = product of:
      0.022092573 = sum of:
        0.007600134 = weight(_text_:in in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007600134 = score(doc=347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
        0.01449244 = weight(_text_:der in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01449244 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Footnote
    Eine interessante Studie, die auf die Anwendung der RSWK übertragen werden könnte.
    Source
    Subject control in online catalogs. Ed.: R.P. Holley
  5. Harms, I.; Schweibenz, W.: Usability engineering methods for the Web (2000) 0.00
    0.0020621393 = product of:
      0.018559255 = sum of:
        0.006008433 = weight(_text_:in in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006008433 = score(doc=5482,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
        0.012550822 = weight(_text_:der in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012550822 = score(doc=5482,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.25648075 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    The paper presents the results of a study on usability methods for evaluating Web sites. It summarizes the "Heuristics for Web Communications," and reports the practical experiences with these heuristics, contrasting them with the "Keevil Index" and combining them with user testing with thinking aloud. It concludes that working with the "Heuristics for Web Communications" takes more time and effort than working with the "Keevil Index," but produces more consistent results. The heuristics proved to be applicable both in heuristic evaluation and in combination with user testing.
    Content
    Der Beitrag präsentiert eine Studie über Evaluationsmethoden zur WebUsability. Er beschreibt die "Heuristics for Web Communications" und berichtet von den praktischen Erfahrungen mit den Heuristiken, die mit dem "Keevil Index" verglichen und mit Benutzertests mit lautem Denken kombiniert werden. Das Ergebnis zeigt, dass eine Evaluation mit den beschriebenen Heuristiken gegenüber dem "Keevil Index" mehr Zeit und Aufwand erfordert, aber konsistentere Ergebnisse bringt. Die Heuristiken haben sich sowohl in der experten-zentrierten Evaluation als auch in Kombination mit dem Benutzertest insgesamt als geeignete Evaluationsmethode erwiesen
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
  6. Park, I.: ¬A comparative study of major OPACs in selected academic libraries for developing countries : user study and subjective user evaluation (1997) 0.00
    0.0017775502 = product of:
      0.015997952 = sum of:
        0.008011244 = weight(_text_:in in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008011244 = score(doc=1778,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
        0.007986708 = product of:
          0.023960123 = sum of:
            0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023960123 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Provides information on the characteristics of 5 online catalogue systems in 5 academic libraries in the austin, Texas and North Texas, USA, and their use by Korean students at University of North Texas, USA, in order to assist system managers in the selection of online catalogues. Proposes recommendations when designing, adopting, or managing a new online catalogue system. Topics for further studies on the characteristics of online systems and their use are also suggested
    Source
    International information and library review. 29(1997) no.1, S.67-83
  7. Sullenger, P.: ¬A serials transaction log analysis (1997) 0.00
    0.0016068673 = product of:
      0.014461806 = sum of:
        0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044784215 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
        0.009983385 = product of:
          0.029950155 = sum of:
            0.029950155 = weight(_text_:29 in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029950155 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    A transaction log analysis of searches for serials looks at how users go about their searching (by title, subject, or keyword) and what problems they encounter, and then examines the results of those searches. Explores ways in which serials records could be improved to enhance retrieval
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:54:49
  8. Fidel, R.: ¬The user-centered approach (2000) 0.00
    0.0014494912 = product of:
      0.013045421 = sum of:
        0.007109274 = weight(_text_:in in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007109274 = score(doc=917,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
        0.0059361467 = product of:
          0.01780844 = sum of:
            0.01780844 = weight(_text_:22 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01780844 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    I started my professional career in library and information science because of my great interest in knowledge organization. The more experience I gained in the profession, the more I realized how crucial it is to understand which organization would be best for each group of users. This in turn requires an understanding of how users seek information. And so now my focus is an studying information seeking and searching behavior. Throughout the relatively long course of changing my focus, I followed Pauline Cochrane's writings. Now I can say that she has been among the first to have a "user-centered approach" to knowledge organization, and she has used the term three years before it became a mainstream phrase. The following is a short discussion about the usercentered approach which was presented in a workshop in 1997.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
  9. Micco, M.: ¬The next generation of online public access catalogs : a new look at subject access using hypermedia (1991) 0.00
    0.001431926 = product of:
      0.012887334 = sum of:
        0.004433411 = weight(_text_:in in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004433411 = score(doc=517,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
        0.008453923 = weight(_text_:der in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008453923 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Current online catalogs have problems providing reasonable subject access, often resulting in searches with too few or too many hits. These problems can be improved by enhancing MARC records, building semantic networks through cross-references, and linking subject headings to classification numbers. This paper describes a pilot project to design a hypertext search engine using these principles
    Content
    Dieser Beitrag enthält beispielsweise die Zahlen, daß 30% der Recherchen bei 0 Treffern landen, daß bei den verbleibenden 70% die durchschnittliche Trefferzahl bei 170 liegt, daß Benutzer durchschnittlich aber nur 7 Treffer genauer ansehen
    Footnote
    s.a. Wiberley et al. in mehreren Beiträgen
  10. Aula, A.; Nordhausen, K.: Modeling successful performance in Web searching (2006) 0.00
    0.0014115159 = product of:
      0.012703643 = sum of:
        0.007756854 = weight(_text_:in in 6117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007756854 = score(doc=6117,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 6117, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6117)
        0.0049467892 = product of:
          0.014840367 = sum of:
            0.014840367 = weight(_text_:22 in 6117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014840367 = score(doc=6117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6117)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Several previous studies have measured differences in the information search success of novices and experts. However, the definitions of novices and experts have varied greatly between the studies, and so have the measures used for search success. Instead of dividing the searchers into different groups based on their expertise, we chose to model search success with task completion speed, TCS. Towards this goal, 22 participants performed three fact-finding tasks and two broader tasks in an observational user study. In our model, there were two variables related to the Web experience of the participants. Other variables included, for example, the speed of query iteration, the length of the queries, the proportion of precise queries, and the speed of evaluating result documents. Our results showed that the variables related to Web experience had expected effects on TCS. The increase in the years of Web use was related to improvement in TCS in the broader tasks, whereas the less frequent Web use was related to a decrease in TCS in the fact-finding tasks. Other variables having significant effects on TCS in either of the task types were the speed of composing queries, the average number of query terms per query, the proportion of precise queries, and the participants' own evaluation of their search skills. In addition to the statistical models, we present several qualitative findings of the participants' search strategies. These results give valuable insight into the successful strategies in Web search beyond the previous knowledge of the expert-novice differences.
  11. Agosto, D.E.: Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making (2002) 0.00
    0.0013908951 = product of:
      0.012518056 = sum of:
        0.0065819086 = weight(_text_:in in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065819086 = score(doc=177,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
        0.0059361467 = product of:
          0.01780844 = sum of:
            0.01780844 = weight(_text_:22 in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01780844 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated Simon's behavioral decisionmaking theories of bounded rationality and satisficing in relation to young people's decision making in the World Wide Web, and considered the role of personal preferences in Web-based decisions. It employed a qualitative research methodology involving group interviews with 22 adolescent females. Data analysis took the form of iterative pattern coding using QSR NUD*IST Vivo qualitative data analysis software. Data analysis revealed that the study participants did operate within the limits of bounded rationality. These limits took the form of time constraints, information overload, and physical constraints. Data analysis also uncovered two major satisficing behaviors-reduction and termination. Personal preference was found to play a major role in Web site evaluation in the areas of graphic/multimedia and subject content preferences. This study has related implications for Web site designers and for adult intermediaries who work with young people and the Web
  12. Bilal, D.: Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine : III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks (2002) 0.00
    0.0013908951 = product of:
      0.012518056 = sum of:
        0.0065819086 = weight(_text_:in in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065819086 = score(doc=5228,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
        0.0059361467 = product of:
          0.01780844 = sum of:
            0.01780844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01780844 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.
  13. Wilson, T.D.: Exploring models of information behaviour : the 'uncertainty' project (1999) 0.00
    0.0013797963 = product of:
      0.012418167 = sum of:
        0.005429798 = weight(_text_:in in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005429798 = score(doc=6785,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
        0.006988369 = product of:
          0.020965107 = sum of:
            0.020965107 = weight(_text_:29 in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020965107 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    My original intention in this Keynote Paper was to talk about models of information behaviour, and I shall do that to some extent. However, both Carol Kuhlthau and Amanda Spink address this general conceptual level of research into information-seeking behaviour and I thought it would more appropriate to present my current research.
    Date
    23. 3.2002 9:29:18
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  14. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.00
    0.0013728114 = product of:
      0.012355302 = sum of:
        0.005429798 = weight(_text_:in in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005429798 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.0069255047 = product of:
          0.020776514 = sum of:
            0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020776514 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  15. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.00
    0.0013728114 = product of:
      0.012355302 = sum of:
        0.005429798 = weight(_text_:in in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005429798 = score(doc=7914,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
        0.0069255047 = product of:
          0.020776514 = sum of:
            0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020776514 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    The library of the Cité des Sciences et de l'industrie attracts 4.000 visitors daily of whom 25% consult the GEAC system OPAC. Describes a 1992 survey consisting of online questions followed by an interview. The questionnaires were adapted from ones used in the UK and utilised OLIVE (Online Interactive Validation and Evaluation). While difficulties arose from users' inconsistency in their replies and failures to answer questions, it has become clear that subject access is unsatisfactory, sometimes because of mistyping by the searcher but also because of the vocabulary problems and lack of guidance in search strategies
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
  16. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.00
    0.0013728114 = product of:
      0.012355302 = sum of:
        0.005429798 = weight(_text_:in in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005429798 = score(doc=1795,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.0069255047 = product of:
          0.020776514 = sum of:
            0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020776514 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a recently composite view of several user studies in information retrieval. Contains personal conclusions and speculations based on these studies, rather than formal statistical results, which so often are not comparable from 1 experiment to another. Suggests a taxonomy of user characteristics for such studies, in order to make results comparable. Discusses methods and effects of user training, then manner of expression of a query or information need, conduct of a search, use of the system command language or its equivalent, analysis by the user of retrieved information, and user satisfaction with outcome. Concludes with suggestions for system design and experimental methodology
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22
  17. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.00
    0.0013728114 = product of:
      0.012355302 = sum of:
        0.005429798 = weight(_text_:in in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005429798 = score(doc=3599,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
        0.0069255047 = product of:
          0.020776514 = sum of:
            0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020776514 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Patron queries at a four-year comprehensive college's online public access catalog were examined via transaction logs from March 2007. Three representative days were isolated for a more detailed examination of search characteristics. The results show that library users employed an average of one to three terms in a search, did not use Boolean operators, and made use of limits one-tenth of the time. Failed queries remained problematic, as a full one-third of searches resulted in zero hits. Implications and recommendations for improvements in the online public access catalog are discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.00
    0.0013364218 = product of:
      0.012027796 = sum of:
        0.0070810067 = weight(_text_:in in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070810067 = score(doc=297,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
        0.0049467892 = product of:
          0.014840367 = sum of:
            0.014840367 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014840367 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  19. Beaudoin, J.E.: Content-based image retrieval methods and professional image users (2016) 0.00
    0.0013364218 = product of:
      0.012027796 = sum of:
        0.0070810067 = weight(_text_:in in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070810067 = score(doc=2637,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
        0.0049467892 = product of:
          0.014840367 = sum of:
            0.014840367 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014840367 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the findings of a qualitative research study that examined professional image users' knowledge of, and interest in using, content-based image retrieval (CBIR) systems in an attempt to clarify when and where CBIR methods might be applied. The research sought to determine the differences in the perceived usefulness of CBIR technologies among image user groups from several domains and explicate the reasons given regarding the utility of CBIR systems for their professional tasks. Twenty participants (archaeologists, architects, art historians, and artists), individuals who rely on images of cultural materials in the performance of their work, took part in the study. The findings of the study reveal that interest in CBIR methods varied among the different professional user communities. Individuals who showed an interest in these systems were primarily those concerned with the formal characteristics (i.e., color, shape, composition, and texture) of the images being sought. In contrast, those participants who expressed a strong interest in images of known items, images illustrating themes, and/or items from specific locations believe concept-based searches to be the most direct route. These image users did not see a practical application for CBIR systems in their current work routines.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:32:25
  20. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Walsh, C.: ¬The effect of postings information on search behaviour (1994) 0.00
    0.0013331628 = product of:
      0.011998464 = sum of:
        0.006008433 = weight(_text_:in in 6890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006008433 = score(doc=6890,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 6890, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6890)
        0.005990031 = product of:
          0.017970093 = sum of:
            0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 6890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017970093 = score(doc=6890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 6890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6890)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    How postings information is used for inverted file searching was investigated by comparing searches, made by postgraduate students at the Dept. of Information Studies, of the LISA database on CD-ROM with and without postings information. Performance (the number of relevant references, precision and recall) was not significantly different but searches with postings information took more time, and more sets were viewed, than in searches without postings. Postings information was used to make decisions to narrow or broaden the search; to view or print the references. The same techniques were used to amend searches whether or not postings information was available. Users decided that a search was satisfactory on the basis of the search results, and consequently many searches done without postings were still considered satisfactory. However, searchers thought that the lack of postings information had affected 90% of their searches. Differences in search performance and searching behaviour were found in participants who were shown to have different learning styles using the Witkin's Embedded Figures test and the Lancaster Short Inventory of Approaches to Learning Test. These differences were, in part, explained by the differences in behaviour indicated by their learning styles
    Source
    Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.1, S.29-40

Years

Types