Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Larson, R.R.: Users look at online catalogs : Pt.2: interacting with online catalogs. Final report for the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.02
    0.017603142 = product of:
      0.052809425 = sum of:
        0.052809425 = weight(_text_:on in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052809425 = score(doc=2424,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.48112202 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Washington, DC : Council on Library Resources
  2. Tolle, J.: Current utilisation of online catalogs : transaction log analysis: final report to the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.01
    0.014225486 = product of:
      0.042676456 = sum of:
        0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 3907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042676456 = score(doc=3907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 3907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3907)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Borgman, C.L.: End user behavior on the Ohio State University Libraries' online catalog : a computer monitoring study (1983) 0.01
    0.014225486 = product of:
      0.042676456 = sum of:
        0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 5259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042676456 = score(doc=5259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 5259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5259)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Woods, F.; Walsh, C.; Ford, N.: Effects of postings information on user searching behaviour (1994) 0.01
    0.013066944 = product of:
      0.03920083 = sum of:
        0.03920083 = weight(_text_:on in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03920083 = score(doc=940,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.35714048 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of an investigation, undertaken at Sheffield University, Departmant of Information Studies, UK into the effects of postings information (the display on the screen of the number of references in the retrieved sets) on searching behaviour. Linked online searches were conducted, on the LISA database on CD-ROM, with and without postings information. Performance in terms of the number of relevant references, precision and recall was not significantly different whether postings information was available or not; but searches with postings information took more time and more sets were viewed than in searches without postings. Searchers thought that the lack of postings information had affected 90% of their searches. Proposes that training should place greater emphasis on the value of postings information at different stages of the search and should optimize the searching behaviour of those with different searching styles
  5. Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992) 0.01
    0.0124473 = product of:
      0.0373419 = sum of:
        0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0373419 = score(doc=367,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The study of subject access to UK academic library catalogues was based on a questionnaires end out during Summer 1991. 86 out of a possible 110 questionnaires were returned. All universities and polytechniques now have OPACs which are progressing well towards comprehensive bibliographical coverage of their libraries' stocks. The MARC format is now widely used. Subject access strategies are usually based on either Library of Congress Subject Headings or inhouse indexing systems but almost half the OPACs studies have no separate subject searching option based on subject indexing is expensive and future subject indexing strategies are best based on pre-existing controlled vocabularies. Strategies authority control is essential. A limited range of software strategies is recommended including the need to limit search results
  6. Hildebrand, M.; Ossenbruggen, J. van; Hardman, L.: ¬An analysis of search-based user interaction on the Semantic Web (2007) 0.01
    0.010779679 = product of:
      0.032339036 = sum of:
        0.032339036 = weight(_text_:on in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032339036 = score(doc=59,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Many Semantic Web applications provide access to their resources through text-based search queries, using explicit semantics to improve the search results. This paper provides an analysis of the current state of the art in semantic search, based on 35 existing systems. We identify different types of semantic search features that are used during query construction, the core search process, the presentation of the search results and user feedback on query and results. For each of these, we consider the functionality that the system provides and how this is made available through the user interface.
  7. University of California users look at MELVYL : results of a survey of users of the University of California prototype online union catalog (1983) 0.01
    0.010669115 = product of:
      0.032007344 = sum of:
        0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 2423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032007344 = score(doc=2423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 2423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2423)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Washington, DC : Council on Library Resources
  8. De Rosa, C.; Cantrell, J.; Cellentani, D.; Hawk, J.; Jenkins, L.; Wilson, A.: Perceptions of libraries and information resources : A Report to the OCLC Membership (2005) 0.01
    0.0053345575 = product of:
      0.016003672 = sum of:
        0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 5018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016003672 = score(doc=5018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 5018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5018)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizes findings of an international study on information-seeking habits and preferences: With extensive input from hundreds of librarians and OCLC staff, the OCLC Market Research team developed a project and commissioned Harris Interactive Inc. to survey a representative sample of information consumers. In June of 2005, we collected over 3,300 responses from information consumers in Australia, Canada, India, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Perceptions report provides the findings and responses from the online survey in an effort to learn more about: * Library use * Awareness and use of library electronic resources * Free vs. for-fee information * The "Library" brand The findings indicate that information consumers view libraries as places to borrow print books, but they are unaware of the rich electronic content they can access through libraries. Even though information consumers make limited use of these resources, they continue to trust libraries as reliable sources of information.