Search (53 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Herman, E.: End-users in academia : meeting the information needs of university researchers in an electronic age (2001) 0.02
    0.015548823 = product of:
      0.031097647 = sum of:
        0.031097647 = product of:
          0.062195294 = sum of:
            0.062195294 = weight(_text_:media in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062195294 = score(doc=700,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is the first part of a two-part paper, which examines the transition to the electronic information era in academia. Seeks to establish from the published literature to what extent university researchers have accepted, and adapted to, the changes wrought in information activity by seemingly endless technological developments. Within the wider context of the impact of the changing information environment on each of the three clearly discernible components of academic research (the creation of knowledge and standards, the preservation of information, and the communication of knowledge and information to others), disciplinary-rooted differences in the conduct of research and their influence on information needs are identified, and the resulting inter- and intra- individual variations in researchers' information seeking behaviour are explored. Reviewing a large number of studies investigating the integration of electronic media into academic work, an attempt is made to paint the picture of academics' progressively harnessing the new technologies to scholarly information gathering endeavours, with the expressed hope of affording some insight into the directions and basic trends characterizing the information activity of university faculty in an increasingly electronic environment.
  2. Chung, J.S.; Neuman, D.: High school students' information seeking and use for class projects (2007) 0.02
    0.015548823 = product of:
      0.031097647 = sum of:
        0.031097647 = product of:
          0.062195294 = sum of:
            0.062195294 = weight(_text_:media in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062195294 = score(doc=575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study details the activities and strategies that 11th grade students with high academic abilities used during their information seeking and use to complete class projects in a Persuasive Speech class. The study took place in a suburban high school in Maryland, and participants included 21 junior honors students, their teacher, and their library media specialist. Each student produced a 5-7-minute speech on a self-chosen topic. Conducted in the framework of qualitative research in a constructivist paradigm (E.G. Guba, & Y.S. Lincoln, 1998), the study used data collected from observations, individual interviews, and documents students produced for their projects - concept maps, paragraphs, outlines, and research journals. Interview and observation data were analyzed using the constant comparative method (B. Glaser & A. Strauss, 1967) with the help of QSR NVivo 2 (QSR International Pty Ltd, 2002); students' documents were analyzed manually. The findings show that students' understanding, strategies, and activities during information seeking and use were interactive and serendipitous and that students learned about their topics as they searched. The research suggests that high school honors students in an information-rich environment are especially confident with learning tasks requiring an exploratory mode of learning.
  3. Zhou, X.; Sun, X.; Wang, Q.; Sharples, S.: ¬A context-based study of serendipity in information research among Chinese scholars (2018) 0.02
    0.015548823 = product of:
      0.031097647 = sum of:
        0.031097647 = product of:
          0.062195294 = sum of:
            0.062195294 = weight(_text_:media in 4244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062195294 = score(doc=4244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 4244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The current understanding of serendipity is based primarily on studies employing westerners as the participants, and it remains uncertain whether or not this understanding would be pervasive under different cultures, such as in China. In addition, there is not a sufficient systematic investigation of context during the occurrence of serendipity in current studies. The purpose of this paper is to examine the above issues by conducting a follow-up empirical study with a group of Chinese scholars. Design/methodology/approach The social media application "WeChat" was employed as a research tool. A diary-based study was conducted and 16 participants were required to send to the researchers any cases of serendipity they encountered during a period of two weeks, and this was followed by a post-interview. Findings Chinese scholars experienced serendipity in line with the three main processes of: encountering unexpectedness, connection-making and recognising the value. An updated context-based serendipity model was constructed, where the role of context during each episode of experiencing serendipity was identified, including the external context (e.g. time, location and status), the social context and the internal context (e.g. precipitating conditions, sagacity/perceptiveness and emotion). Originality/value The updated context model provides a further understanding of the role played by context during the different processes of serendipity. The framework for experiencing serendipity has been expanded, and this may be used to classify the categories of serendipity.
  4. Vuong, T.; Saastamoinen, M.; Jacucci, G.; Ruotsalo, T.: Understanding user behavior in naturalistic information search tasks (2019) 0.02
    0.015548823 = product of:
      0.031097647 = sum of:
        0.031097647 = product of:
          0.062195294 = sum of:
            0.062195294 = weight(_text_:media in 5419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062195294 = score(doc=5419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 5419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Understanding users' search behavior has largely relied on the information available from search engine logs, which provide limited information about the contextual factors affecting users' behavior. Consequently, questions such as how users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the users' tasks affect search behavior, as well as what triggers information needs, remain largely unanswered. We report an experiment in which naturalistic information search behavior was captured by analyzing 24/7 continuous recordings of information on participants' computer screens. Written task diaries describing the participants' tasks were collected and used as real-life task contexts for further categorization. All search tasks were extracted and classified under various task categories according to users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the tasks. We investigated the effect of different task categories on three behavioral factors: search efforts, content-triggers, and application context. Our results suggest four findings: (i) Search activity is integrally associated with the users' creative processes. The content users have seen prior to searching more often triggers search, and is used as a query, within creative tasks. (ii) Searching within intellectual and creative tasks is more time-intensive, while search activity occurring as a part of daily routine tasks is associated with more frequent searching within a search task. (iii) Searching is more often induced from utility applications in tasks demanding a degree of intellectual effort. (iv) Users' leisure information-seeking activity is occurring inherently within social media services or comes from social communication platforms. The implications of our findings for information access and management systems are discussed.
  5. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01
    0.013905852 = product of:
      0.027811704 = sum of:
        0.027811704 = product of:
          0.05562341 = sum of:
            0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05562341 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  6. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.01
    0.013905852 = product of:
      0.027811704 = sum of:
        0.027811704 = product of:
          0.05562341 = sum of:
            0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05562341 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  7. Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006) 0.01
    0.013905852 = product of:
      0.027811704 = sum of:
        0.027811704 = product of:
          0.05562341 = sum of:
            0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05562341 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:17:44
  8. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.01
    0.0121676205 = product of:
      0.024335241 = sum of:
        0.024335241 = product of:
          0.048670482 = sum of:
            0.048670482 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048670482 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  9. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01
    0.0121676205 = product of:
      0.024335241 = sum of:
        0.024335241 = product of:
          0.048670482 = sum of:
            0.048670482 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048670482 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
  10. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.01
    0.0121676205 = product of:
      0.024335241 = sum of:
        0.024335241 = product of:
          0.048670482 = sum of:
            0.048670482 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048670482 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22
  11. Berger, F.C.; Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Van der Weide, T.P.: Supporting query by navigation (1996) 0.01
    0.0121676205 = product of:
      0.024335241 = sum of:
        0.024335241 = product of:
          0.048670482 = sum of:
            0.048670482 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048670482 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  12. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.0121676205 = product of:
      0.024335241 = sum of:
        0.024335241 = product of:
          0.048670482 = sum of:
            0.048670482 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048670482 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Agosto, D.E.: Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making (2002) 0.01
    0.010429389 = product of:
      0.020858778 = sum of:
        0.020858778 = product of:
          0.041717555 = sum of:
            0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041717555 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated Simon's behavioral decisionmaking theories of bounded rationality and satisficing in relation to young people's decision making in the World Wide Web, and considered the role of personal preferences in Web-based decisions. It employed a qualitative research methodology involving group interviews with 22 adolescent females. Data analysis took the form of iterative pattern coding using QSR NUD*IST Vivo qualitative data analysis software. Data analysis revealed that the study participants did operate within the limits of bounded rationality. These limits took the form of time constraints, information overload, and physical constraints. Data analysis also uncovered two major satisficing behaviors-reduction and termination. Personal preference was found to play a major role in Web site evaluation in the areas of graphic/multimedia and subject content preferences. This study has related implications for Web site designers and for adult intermediaries who work with young people and the Web
  14. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Rahman, T.: Design criteria for children's Web portals : the users speak out (2002) 0.01
    0.010429389 = product of:
      0.020858778 = sum of:
        0.020858778 = product of:
          0.041717555 = sum of:
            0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041717555 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2005 10:34:22
  15. Fidel, R.: ¬The user-centered approach (2000) 0.01
    0.010429389 = product of:
      0.020858778 = sum of:
        0.020858778 = product of:
          0.041717555 = sum of:
            0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041717555 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  16. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: End-user understanding of subject headings in library catalogs (1999) 0.01
    0.010429389 = product of:
      0.020858778 = sum of:
        0.020858778 = product of:
          0.041717555 = sum of:
            0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041717555 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Bilal, D.: Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine : III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks (2002) 0.01
    0.010429389 = product of:
      0.020858778 = sum of:
        0.020858778 = product of:
          0.041717555 = sum of:
            0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041717555 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.
  18. Kim, J.: Describing and predicting information-seeking behavior on the Web (2009) 0.01
    0.010429389 = product of:
      0.020858778 = sum of:
        0.020858778 = product of:
          0.041717555 = sum of:
            0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041717555 = score(doc=2747,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:54:15
  19. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.01
    0.010429389 = product of:
      0.020858778 = sum of:
        0.020858778 = product of:
          0.041717555 = sum of:
            0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041717555 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  20. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.008691157 = product of:
      0.017382314 = sum of:
        0.017382314 = product of:
          0.03476463 = sum of:
            0.03476463 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03476463 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 53
  • b 1
  • More… Less…