-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.03
0.027999477 = product of:
0.055998955 = sum of:
0.055998955 = sum of:
0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018749513 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037249442 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.024832962 = product of:
0.049665924 = sum of:
0.049665924 = product of:
0.09933185 = sum of:
0.09933185 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09933185 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.021949446 = product of:
0.04389889 = sum of:
0.04389889 = product of:
0.08779778 = sum of:
0.08779778 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08779778 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.013169668 = product of:
0.026339335 = sum of:
0.026339335 = product of:
0.05267867 = sum of:
0.05267867 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05267867 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Small, H.; Sweeney, E.: Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations (1985)
0.01
0.012499675 = product of:
0.02499935 = sum of:
0.02499935 = product of:
0.0499987 = sum of:
0.0499987 = weight(_text_:h in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0499987 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.009312361 = product of:
0.018624721 = sum of:
0.018624721 = product of:
0.037249442 = sum of:
0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037249442 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000)
0.01
0.0078122974 = product of:
0.015624595 = sum of:
0.015624595 = product of:
0.03124919 = sum of:
0.03124919 = weight(_text_:h in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03124919 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0062082405 = product of:
0.012416481 = sum of:
0.012416481 = product of:
0.024832962 = sum of:
0.024832962 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024832962 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Braun, T.; Glanzel, W.; Grupp, H.: ¬The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 scientific areas, 1989-1993 : Pt.1: All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics (1995)
0.01
0.005468608 = product of:
0.010937216 = sum of:
0.010937216 = product of:
0.021874432 = sum of:
0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021874432 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Neuhaus, C.; Daniel, H.-D.: Data sources for performing citation analysis : an overview (2008)
0.01
0.005468608 = product of:
0.010937216 = sum of:
0.010937216 = product of:
0.021874432 = sum of:
0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 1735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021874432 = score(doc=1735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995)
0.00
0.004687378 = product of:
0.009374756 = sum of:
0.009374756 = product of:
0.018749513 = sum of:
0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018749513 = score(doc=1825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Boyack, K.W.; Small, H.; Klavans, R.: Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text (2013)
0.00
0.004687378 = product of:
0.009374756 = sum of:
0.009374756 = product of:
0.018749513 = sum of:
0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 1036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018749513 = score(doc=1036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1036)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)
0.00
0.0039061487 = product of:
0.0078122974 = sum of:
0.0078122974 = product of:
0.015624595 = sum of:
0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015624595 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
0.00
0.0039061487 = product of:
0.0078122974 = sum of:
0.0078122974 = product of:
0.015624595 = sum of:
0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015624595 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this study, reference standards and reference multipliers are suggested as a means to compare the citation impact of earlier research publications in physics (from the period of "Little Science" in the early 20th century) with that of contemporary papers (from the period of "Big Science," beginning around 1960). For the development of time-specific reference standards, the authors determined (a) the mean citation rates of papers in selected physics journals as well as (b) the mean citation rates of all papers in physics published in 1900 (Little Science) and in 2000 (Big Science); this was accomplished by relying on the processes of field-specific standardization in bibliometry. For the sake of developing reference multipliers with which the citation impact of earlier papers can be adjusted to the citation impact of contemporary papers, they combined the reference standards calculated for 1900 and 2000 into their ratio. The use of reference multipliers is demonstrated by means of two examples involving the time adjusted h index values for Max Planck and Albert Einstein.
-
Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.: Multidimensional scholarly citations : characterizing and understanding scholars' citation behaviors (2023)
0.00
0.0039061487 = product of:
0.0078122974 = sum of:
0.0078122974 = product of:
0.015624595 = sum of:
0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015624595 = score(doc=847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study investigates scholars' citation behaviors from a fine-grained perspective. Specifically, each scholarly citation is considered multidimensional rather than logically unidimensional (i.e., present or absent). Thirty million articles from PubMed were accessed for use in empirical research, in which a total of 15 interpretable features of scholarly citations were constructed and grouped into three main categories. Each category corresponds to one aspect of the reasons and motivations behind scholars' citation decision-making during academic writing. Using about 500,000 pairs of actual and randomly generated scholarly citations, a series of Random Forest-based classification experiments were conducted to quantitatively evaluate the correlation between each constructed citation feature and citation decisions made by scholars. Our experimental results indicate that citation proximity is the category most relevant to scholars' citation decision-making, followed by citation authority and citation inertia. However, big-name scholars whose h-indexes rank among the top 1% exhibit a unique pattern of citation behaviors-their citation decision-making correlates most closely with citation inertia, with the correlation nearly three times as strong as that of their ordinary counterparts. Hopefully, the empirical findings presented in this paper can bring us closer to characterizing and understanding the complex process of generating scholarly citations in academia.
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008)
0.00
0.0031249188 = product of:
0.0062498376 = sum of:
0.0062498376 = product of:
0.012499675 = sum of:
0.012499675 = weight(_text_:h in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012499675 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008)
0.00
0.0031249188 = product of:
0.0062498376 = sum of:
0.0062498376 = product of:
0.012499675 = sum of:
0.012499675 = weight(_text_:h in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012499675 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045821942 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
