Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Braam, R.R.; Moed, H.F.; Raan, F.J. van: Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis : T.1: Structural aspects - T.2: Dynamical Aspects (1991) 0.05 
    0.04668439 = product of:
  0.09336878 = sum of:
    0.09336878 = product of:
      0.18673757 = sum of:
        0.18673757 = weight(_text_:t in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18673757 = score(doc=1119,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            1.0445935 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.233-251(T.1); S.252-266(T.2)
  2. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.04 
    0.041786816 = product of:
  0.08357363 = sum of:
    0.08357363 = sum of:
      0.04668439 = weight(_text_:t in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04668439 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04537884 = queryNorm
          0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.03688924 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03688924 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04537884 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02 
    0.024592828 = product of:
  0.049185656 = sum of:
    0.049185656 = product of:
      0.09837131 = sum of:
        0.09837131 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09837131 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02 
    0.024592828 = product of:
  0.049185656 = sum of:
    0.049185656 = product of:
      0.09837131 = sum of:
        0.09837131 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09837131 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.021737194 = product of:
  0.043474387 = sum of:
    0.043474387 = product of:
      0.086948775 = sum of:
        0.086948775 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086948775 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  6. Burrell, Q.L.: Will this paper ever be cited? (2002) 0.02 
    0.015561464 = product of:
  0.031122928 = sum of:
    0.031122928 = product of:
      0.062245857 = sum of:
        0.062245857 = weight(_text_:t in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062245857 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A recently proposed stochastic model to describe the citation process in the presence of obsolescence is used to answer the question: If a paper has not been cited by time t after its publication, what is the probability that it will ever be cited?
  7. Braun, T.; Glanzel, W.; Grupp, H.: ¬The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 scientific areas, 1989-1993 : Pt.1: All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics (1995) 0.01 
    0.013616281 = product of:
  0.027232561 = sum of:
    0.027232561 = product of:
      0.054465123 = sum of:
        0.054465123 = weight(_text_:t in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054465123 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Cawkell, T.: Checking research progress on 'image retrieval by shape matching' using the Web of Science (1998) 0.01 
    0.013616281 = product of:
  0.027232561 = sum of:
    0.027232561 = product of:
      0.054465123 = sum of:
        0.054465123 = weight(_text_:t in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054465123 = score(doc=3571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Brody, T.; Harnad, S.; Carr, L.: Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact (2006) 0.01 
    0.013616281 = product of:
  0.027232561 = sum of:
    0.027232561 = product of:
      0.054465123 = sum of:
        0.054465123 = weight(_text_:t in 165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054465123 = score(doc=165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.013042317 = product of:
  0.026084634 = sum of:
    0.026084634 = product of:
      0.052169267 = sum of:
        0.052169267 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052169267 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  11. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.012296414 = product of:
  0.024592828 = sum of:
    0.024592828 = product of:
      0.049185656 = sum of:
        0.049185656 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049185656 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  12. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.01 
    0.011671098 = product of:
  0.023342196 = sum of:
    0.023342196 = product of:
      0.04668439 = sum of:
        0.04668439 = weight(_text_:t in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04668439 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
  13. Chen, C.; Cribbin, T.; Macredie, R.; Morar, S.: Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms : two case studies (2002) 0.01 
    0.011671098 = product of:
  0.023342196 = sum of:
    0.023342196 = product of:
      0.04668439 = sum of:
        0.04668439 = weight(_text_:t in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04668439 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004) 0.01 
    0.011671098 = product of:
  0.023342196 = sum of:
    0.023342196 = product of:
      0.04668439 = sum of:
        0.04668439 = weight(_text_:t in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04668439 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Sombatsompop, N.; Markpin, T.: Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields (2005) 0.01 
    0.011671098 = product of:
  0.023342196 = sum of:
    0.023342196 = product of:
      0.04668439 = sum of:
        0.04668439 = weight(_text_:t in 3467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04668439 = score(doc=3467,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 3467, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3467)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Leydesdorff, L.; Opthof, T.: Citation analysis with medical subject Headings (MeSH) using the Web of Knowledge : a new routine (2013) 0.01 
    0.011671098 = product of:
  0.023342196 = sum of:
    0.023342196 = product of:
      0.04668439 = sum of:
        0.04668439 = weight(_text_:t in 943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04668439 = score(doc=943,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17876579 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 943, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01 
    0.010759362 = product of:
  0.021518724 = sum of:
    0.021518724 = product of:
      0.043037448 = sum of:
        0.043037448 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043037448 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  18. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01 
    0.010759362 = product of:
  0.021518724 = sum of:
    0.021518724 = product of:
      0.043037448 = sum of:
        0.043037448 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043037448 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  19. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01 
    0.010759362 = product of:
  0.021518724 = sum of:
    0.021518724 = product of:
      0.043037448 = sum of:
        0.043037448 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043037448 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  20. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01 
    0.00922231 = product of:
  0.01844462 = sum of:
    0.01844462 = product of:
      0.03688924 = sum of:
        0.03688924 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03688924 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15890898 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04537884 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles

Authors

Years

Themes