Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.06
    0.060774364 = product of:
      0.12154873 = sum of:
        0.12154873 = sum of:
          0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029968852 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055180833 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.03639904 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03639904 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.06
    0.05899369 = product of:
      0.11798738 = sum of:
        0.11798738 = product of:
          0.17698106 = sum of:
            0.07991694 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07991694 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
            0.097064115 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097064115 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  3. Jacobs, N.; Woodfield, J.; Morris, A.: Using local citation data to relate the use of journal articles by academic researchers to the coverage of full-text document access systems (2000) 0.03
    0.028383229 = product of:
      0.056766458 = sum of:
        0.056766458 = product of:
          0.08514968 = sum of:
            0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029968852 = score(doc=4541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
            0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055180833 = score(doc=4541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Klitzing, N.; Hoekstra, R.; Strijbos, J.-W,: Literature practices : processes leading up to a citation (2019) 0.02
    0.023652691 = product of:
      0.047305383 = sum of:
        0.047305383 = product of:
          0.07095807 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=4628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
            0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045984026 = score(doc=4628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.02
    0.022122633 = product of:
      0.044245265 = sum of:
        0.044245265 = product of:
          0.066367894 = sum of:
            0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029968852 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
            0.03639904 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03639904 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  6. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02
    0.016177353 = product of:
      0.032354705 = sum of:
        0.032354705 = product of:
          0.097064115 = sum of:
            0.097064115 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097064115 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  7. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01
    0.014298895 = product of:
      0.02859779 = sum of:
        0.02859779 = product of:
          0.08579337 = sum of:
            0.08579337 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08579337 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.01
    0.011535017 = product of:
      0.023070034 = sum of:
        0.023070034 = product of:
          0.0692101 = sum of:
            0.0692101 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0692101 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
  9. Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002) 0.01
    0.010729606 = product of:
      0.021459213 = sum of:
        0.021459213 = product of:
          0.064377636 = sum of:
            0.064377636 = weight(_text_:n in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064377636 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Can the inclusion of new journals in the Science Citation Index be used for the indication of structural change in the database, and how can this change be compared with reorganizations of reiations among previously included journals? Change in the number of journals (n) is distinguished from change in the number of journal categories (m). Although the number of journals can be considered as a given at each moment in time, the number of journal categories is based an a reconstruction that is time-stamped ex post. The reflexive reconstruction is in need of an update when new information becomes available in a next year. Implications of this shift towards an evolutionary perspective are specified.
  10. Sombatsompop, N.; Markpin, T.: Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields (2005) 0.01
    0.009196806 = product of:
      0.018393612 = sum of:
        0.018393612 = product of:
          0.055180833 = sum of:
            0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 3467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055180833 = score(doc=3467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3467)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core articles (2007) 0.01
    0.009196806 = product of:
      0.018393612 = sum of:
        0.018393612 = product of:
          0.055180833 = sum of:
            0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055180833 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008) 0.01
    0.008670832 = product of:
      0.017341664 = sum of:
        0.017341664 = product of:
          0.05202499 = sum of:
            0.05202499 = weight(_text_:n in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05202499 = score(doc=2381,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.26947853 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    All journals that use peer review have to deal with the following question: Does the peer review system fulfill its declared objective to select the best scientific work? We investigated the journal peer-review process at Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC-IE), one of the prime chemistry journals worldwide, and conducted a citation analysis for Communications that were accepted by the journal (n = 878) or rejected but published elsewhere (n = 959). The results of negative binomial-regression models show that holding all other model variables constant, being accepted by AC-IE increases the expected number of citations by up to 50%. A comparison of average citation counts (with 95% confidence intervals) of accepted and rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications with international scientific reference standards was undertaken. As reference standards, (a) mean citation counts for the journal set provided by Thomson Reuters corresponding to the field chemistry and (b) specific reference standards that refer to the subject areas of Chemical Abstracts were used. When compared to reference standards, the mean impact on chemical research is for the most part far above average not only for accepted Communications but also for rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications. However, average and below-average scientific impact is to be expected significantly less frequently for accepted Communications than for rejected Communications. All in all, the results of this study confirm that peer review at AC-IE is able to select the best scientific work with the highest impact on chemical research.
  13. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.008579338 = product of:
      0.017158676 = sum of:
        0.017158676 = product of:
          0.051476024 = sum of:
            0.051476024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051476024 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  14. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.008088676 = product of:
      0.016177353 = sum of:
        0.016177353 = product of:
          0.048532058 = sum of:
            0.048532058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048532058 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  15. Joint, N.: Bemused by bibliometrics : using citation analysis to evaluate research quality (2008) 0.01
    0.0076640043 = product of:
      0.015328009 = sum of:
        0.015328009 = product of:
          0.045984026 = sum of:
            0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045984026 = score(doc=1900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Robinson-García, N.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.; Torres-Salinas, D.: Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index : a study of backup strategies of end users (2016) 0.01
    0.0076640043 = product of:
      0.015328009 = sum of:
        0.015328009 = product of:
          0.045984026 = sum of:
            0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045984026 = score(doc=3225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.01
    0.0072093857 = product of:
      0.0144187715 = sum of:
        0.0144187715 = product of:
          0.043256313 = sum of:
            0.043256313 = weight(_text_:j in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043256313 = score(doc=5220,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.304033 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Journal Citation Reports provides a classification of journals most heavily cited by a given journal and which most heavily cite that journal, but size variation is not taken into account. Pudovkin and Garfield suggest a procedure for meeting this difficulty. The relatedness of journal i to journal j is determined by the number of citations from journal i to journal j in a given year normalized by the product of the papers published in the j journal in that year times the number of references cited in the i journal in that year. A multiplier of ten to the sixth is suggested to bring the values into an easily perceptible range. While citations received depend upon the overall cumulative number of papers published by a journal, the current year is utilized since that data is available in JCR. Citations to current year papers would be quite low in most fields and thus not included. To produce the final index, the maximum of the A citing B value, and the B citing A value is chosen and used to indicate the closeness of the journals. The procedure is illustrated for the journal Genetics.
  18. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01
    0.0070775915 = product of:
      0.014155183 = sum of:
        0.014155183 = product of:
          0.04246555 = sum of:
            0.04246555 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04246555 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  19. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01
    0.0070775915 = product of:
      0.014155183 = sum of:
        0.014155183 = product of:
          0.04246555 = sum of:
            0.04246555 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04246555 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  20. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01
    0.0070775915 = product of:
      0.014155183 = sum of:
        0.014155183 = product of:
          0.04246555 = sum of:
            0.04246555 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04246555 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59