-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.03
0.032361146 = product of:
0.06472229 = sum of:
0.06472229 = sum of:
0.044425644 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044425644 = score(doc=5171,freq=12.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.358346 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.020296646 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020296646 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.020296646 = product of:
0.040593293 = sum of:
0.040593293 = product of:
0.081186585 = sum of:
0.081186585 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081186585 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.017939871 = product of:
0.035879742 = sum of:
0.035879742 = product of:
0.071759485 = sum of:
0.071759485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071759485 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.010763924 = product of:
0.021527847 = sum of:
0.021527847 = product of:
0.043055695 = sum of:
0.043055695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043055695 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006)
0.01
0.009068346 = product of:
0.018136691 = sum of:
0.018136691 = product of:
0.036273383 = sum of:
0.036273383 = weight(_text_:r in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036273383 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.008879783 = product of:
0.017759565 = sum of:
0.017759565 = product of:
0.03551913 = sum of:
0.03551913 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551913 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.008879783 = product of:
0.017759565 = sum of:
0.017759565 = product of:
0.03551913 = sum of:
0.03551913 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551913 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.0076112426 = product of:
0.015222485 = sum of:
0.015222485 = product of:
0.03044497 = sum of:
0.03044497 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03044497 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.0076112426 = product of:
0.015222485 = sum of:
0.015222485 = product of:
0.03044497 = sum of:
0.03044497 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03044497 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.0076112426 = product of:
0.015222485 = sum of:
0.015222485 = product of:
0.03044497 = sum of:
0.03044497 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03044497 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13114879 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
-
Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.01
0.0068012597 = product of:
0.013602519 = sum of:
0.013602519 = product of:
0.027205039 = sum of:
0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027205039 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
-
Chen, C.; Cribbin, T.; Macredie, R.; Morar, S.: Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms : two case studies (2002)
0.01
0.0068012597 = product of:
0.013602519 = sum of:
0.013602519 = product of:
0.027205039 = sum of:
0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027205039 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005)
0.01
0.0068012597 = product of:
0.013602519 = sum of:
0.013602519 = product of:
0.027205039 = sum of:
0.027205039 = weight(_text_:r in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027205039 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.01
0.0056677163 = product of:
0.0113354325 = sum of:
0.0113354325 = product of:
0.022670865 = sum of:
0.022670865 = weight(_text_:r in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022670865 = score(doc=2266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lai, K.-K.; Wu, S.-J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system (2005)
0.01
0.0056677163 = product of:
0.0113354325 = sum of:
0.0113354325 = product of:
0.022670865 = sum of:
0.022670865 = weight(_text_:r in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022670865 = score(doc=1013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper proposes a new approach to create a patent classification system to replace the IPC or UPC system for conducting patent analysis and management. The new approach is based on co-citation analysis of bibliometrics. The traditional approach for management of patents, which is based on either the IPC or UPC, is too general to meet the needs of specific industries. In addition, some patents are placed in incorrect categories, making it difficult for enterprises to carry out R&D planning, technology positioning, patent strategy-making and technology forecasting. Therefore, it is essential to develop a patent classification system that is adaptive to the characteristics of a specific industry. The analysis of this approach is divided into three phases. Phase I selects appropriate databases to conduct patent searches according to the subject and objective of this study and then select basic patents. Phase II uses the co-cited frequency of the basic patent pairs to assess their similarity. Phase III uses factor analysis to establish a classification system and assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The main contribution of this approach is to develop a patent classification system based on patent similarities to assist patent manager in understanding the basic patents for a specific industry, the relationships among categories of technologies and the evolution of a technology category.
-
Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004)
0.00
0.004534173 = product of:
0.009068346 = sum of:
0.009068346 = product of:
0.018136691 = sum of:
0.018136691 = weight(_text_:r in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018136691 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12397416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.037451506 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
