Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.024832444 = product of:
      0.04966489 = sum of:
        0.04966489 = product of:
          0.09932978 = sum of:
            0.09932978 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09932978 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.021948986 = product of:
      0.04389797 = sum of:
        0.04389797 = product of:
          0.08779594 = sum of:
            0.08779594 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08779594 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  3. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.013169393 = product of:
      0.026338786 = sum of:
        0.026338786 = product of:
          0.05267757 = sum of:
            0.05267757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05267757 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  4. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01
    0.010864194 = product of:
      0.021728387 = sum of:
        0.021728387 = product of:
          0.043456774 = sum of:
            0.043456774 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043456774 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  5. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01
    0.010864194 = product of:
      0.021728387 = sum of:
        0.021728387 = product of:
          0.043456774 = sum of:
            0.043456774 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043456774 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  6. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  7. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  8. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  9. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.01
    0.007837306 = product of:
      0.015674612 = sum of:
        0.015674612 = product of:
          0.031349223 = sum of:
            0.031349223 = weight(_text_:m in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031349223 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  10. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.006208111 = product of:
      0.012416222 = sum of:
        0.012416222 = product of:
          0.024832444 = sum of:
            0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832444 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  12. Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002) 0.01
    0.005486114 = product of:
      0.010972228 = sum of:
        0.010972228 = product of:
          0.021944456 = sum of:
            0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021944456 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Can the inclusion of new journals in the Science Citation Index be used for the indication of structural change in the database, and how can this change be compared with reorganizations of reiations among previously included journals? Change in the number of journals (n) is distinguished from change in the number of journal categories (m). Although the number of journals can be considered as a given at each moment in time, the number of journal categories is based an a reconstruction that is time-stamped ex post. The reflexive reconstruction is in need of an update when new information becomes available in a next year. Implications of this shift towards an evolutionary perspective are specified.
  13. Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: ¬The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages : an investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university (2003) 0.01
    0.005486114 = product of:
      0.010972228 = sum of:
        0.010972228 = product of:
          0.021944456 = sum of:
            0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021944456 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.00
    0.0047023837 = product of:
      0.009404767 = sum of:
        0.009404767 = product of:
          0.018809535 = sum of:
            0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018809535 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
  15. Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004) 0.00
    0.0047023837 = product of:
      0.009404767 = sum of:
        0.009404767 = product of:
          0.018809535 = sum of:
            0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018809535 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.00
    0.00443345 = product of:
      0.0088669 = sum of:
        0.0088669 = product of:
          0.0177338 = sum of:
            0.0177338 = weight(_text_:m in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0177338 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15552804 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
    Type
    m
  17. Thelwall, M.: Extracting macroscopic information from Web links (2001) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 6851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=6851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 6851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.; Björneborn, L.: Webometrics (2004) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007) 0.00
    0.003918653 = product of:
      0.007837306 = sum of:
        0.007837306 = product of:
          0.015674612 = sum of:
            0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015674612 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Scientists may seek to report a single definable body of research in more than one publication, that is, in repeated reports of the same work or in fractional reports, in order to disseminate their research as widely as possible in the scientific community. Up to now, however, it has not been examined whether this strategy of "multiple publication" in fact leads to greater reception of the research. In the present study, we investigate the influence of number of articles reporting the results of a single study on reception in the scientific community (total citation counts of an article on a single study). Our data set consists of 96 applicants for a research fellowship from the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (BIF), an international foundation for the promotion of basic research in biomedicine. The applicants reported to us all articles that they had published within the framework of their doctoral research projects. On this single project, the applicants had published from 1 to 16 articles (M = 4; Mdn = 3). The results of a regression model with an interaction term show that the practice of multiple publication of research study results does in fact lead to greater reception of the research (higher total citation counts) in the scientific community. However, reception is dependent upon length of article: the longer the article, the more total citation counts increase with the number of articles. Thus, it pays for scientists to practice multiple publication of study results in the form of sizable reports.