Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.05 
    0.05329252 = product of:
  0.10658504 = sum of:
    0.06303884 = weight(_text_:b in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06303884 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
    0.043546196 = product of:
      0.08709239 = sum of:
        0.08709239 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08709239 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15917146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0454538 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  2. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.03 
    0.03284073 = product of:
  0.06568146 = sum of:
    0.04412719 = weight(_text_:b in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04412719 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
    0.021554269 = product of:
      0.043108538 = sum of:
        0.043108538 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043108538 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0454538 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  3. Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond : some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001) 0.02 
    0.022063594 = product of:
  0.08825438 = sum of:
    0.08825438 = weight(_text_:b in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08825438 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  4. Larsen, B.: Exploiting citation overlaps for information retrieval : generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers (2002) 0.02 
    0.018911652 = product of:
  0.07564661 = sum of:
    0.07564661 = weight(_text_:b in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07564661 = score(doc=4175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  5. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.02 
    0.018766131 = product of:
  0.037532263 = sum of:
    0.025215536 = weight(_text_:b in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025215536 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
    0.012316724 = product of:
      0.024633449 = sum of:
        0.024633449 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024633449 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0454538 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  6. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.02 
    0.01575971 = product of:
  0.06303884 = sum of:
    0.06303884 = weight(_text_:b in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06303884 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
  7. Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics (2000) 0.02 
    0.01575971 = product of:
  0.06303884 = sum of:
    0.06303884 = weight(_text_:b in 4542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06303884 = score(doc=4542,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 4542, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4542)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  8. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002) 0.01 
    0.012607768 = product of:
  0.050431073 = sum of:
    0.050431073 = weight(_text_:b in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050431073 = score(doc=1263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  9. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.012316724 = product of:
  0.049266897 = sum of:
    0.049266897 = product of:
      0.098533794 = sum of:
        0.098533794 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098533794 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0454538 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  10. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.01 
    0.011143798 = product of:
  0.044575192 = sum of:
    0.044575192 = weight(_text_:b in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044575192 = score(doc=5220,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Journal Citation Reports provides a classification of journals most heavily cited by a given journal and which most heavily cite that journal, but size variation is not taken into account. Pudovkin and Garfield suggest a procedure for meeting this difficulty. The relatedness of journal i to journal j is determined by the number of citations from journal i to journal j in a given year normalized by the product of the papers published in the j journal in that year times the number of references cited in the i journal in that year. A multiplier of ten to the sixth is suggested to bring the values into an easily perceptible range. While citations received depend upon the overall cumulative number of papers published by a journal, the current year is utilized since that data is available in JCR. Citations to current year papers would be quite low in most fields and thus not included. To produce the final index, the maximum of the A citing B value, and the B citing A value is chosen and used to indicate the closeness of the journals. The procedure is illustrated for the journal Genetics.
  11. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Can citation analysis of Web publications better detect research fronts? (2007) 0.01 
    0.011143798 = product of:
  0.044575192 = sum of:
    0.044575192 = weight(_text_:b in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044575192 = score(doc=471,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    We present evidence that in some research fields, research published in journals and reported on the Web may collectively represent different evolutionary stages of the field, with journals lagging a few years behind the Web on average, and that a "two-tier" scholarly communication system may therefore be evolving. We conclude that in such fields, (a) for detecting current research fronts, author co-citation analyses (ACA) using articles published on the Web as a data source can outperform traditional ACAs using articles published in journals as data, and that (b) as a result, it is important to use multiple data sources in citation analysis studies of scholarly communication for a complete picture of communication patterns. Our evidence stems from comparing the respective intellectual structures of the XML research field, a subfield of computer science, as revealed from three sets of ACA covering two time periods: (a) from the field's beginnings in 1996 to 2001, and (b) from 2001 to 2006. For the first time period, we analyze research articles both from journals as indexed by the Science Citation Index (SCI) and from the Web as indexed by CiteSeer. We follow up by an ACA of SCI data for the second time period. We find that most trends in the evolution of this field from the first to the second time period that we find when comparing ACA results from the SCI between the two time periods already were apparent in the ACA results from CiteSeer during the first time period.
  12. Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003) 0.01 
    0.011031797 = product of:
  0.04412719 = sum of:
    0.04412719 = weight(_text_:b in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04412719 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Meho, L.I.; Sonnenwald, D.H.: Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance : a case study of Kurdish scholarship (2000) 0.01 
    0.009455826 = product of:
  0.037823305 = sum of:
    0.037823305 = weight(_text_:b in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037823305 = score(doc=4382,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between citation ranking and peer evaluation in assessing senior faculty research performance. Other studies typically derive their peer evaluation data directly from referees, often in the form of ranking. This study uses two additional sources of peer evaluation data: citation contant analysis and book review content analysis. 2 main questions are investigated: (a) To what degree does citation ranking correlate with data from citation content analysis, book reviews and peer ranking? (b) Is citation ranking a valif evaluative indicator of research performance of senior faculty members? This study shows that citation ranking can provide a valid indicator for comparative evaluation of senior faculty research performance
  14. Chen, C.; Paul, R.J.; O'Keefe, B.: Fitting the Jigsaw of citation : information visualization in domain analysis (2001) 0.01 
    0.009455826 = product of:
  0.037823305 = sum of:
    0.037823305 = weight(_text_:b in 5766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037823305 = score(doc=5766,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 5766, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5766)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  15. Aguillo, I.F.; Granadino, B.; Ortega, J.L.; Prieto, J.A.: Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators (2006) 0.01 
    0.009455826 = product of:
  0.037823305 = sum of:
    0.037823305 = weight(_text_:b in 5898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037823305 = score(doc=5898,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 5898, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5898)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. Johnson, B.; Oppenheim, C.: How socially connected are citers to those that they cite? (2007) 0.01 
    0.007879855 = product of:
  0.03151942 = sum of:
    0.03151942 = weight(_text_:b in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03151942 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.00653193 = product of:
  0.02612772 = sum of:
    0.02612772 = product of:
      0.05225544 = sum of:
        0.05225544 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05225544 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15917146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0454538 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  18. White, H.D.; Wellman, B.; Nazer, N.: Does Citation Reflect Social Structure? : Longitudinal Evidence From the "Globenet" Interdisciplinary Research Group (2004) 0.01 
    0.006303884 = product of:
  0.025215536 = sum of:
    0.025215536 = weight(_text_:b in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025215536 = score(doc=2095,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  19. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008) 0.01 
    0.006303884 = product of:
  0.025215536 = sum of:
    0.025215536 = weight(_text_:b in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025215536 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1610411 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0454538 = queryNorm
        0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    All journals that use peer review have to deal with the following question: Does the peer review system fulfill its declared objective to select the best scientific work? We investigated the journal peer-review process at Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC-IE), one of the prime chemistry journals worldwide, and conducted a citation analysis for Communications that were accepted by the journal (n = 878) or rejected but published elsewhere (n = 959). The results of negative binomial-regression models show that holding all other model variables constant, being accepted by AC-IE increases the expected number of citations by up to 50%. A comparison of average citation counts (with 95% confidence intervals) of accepted and rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications with international scientific reference standards was undertaken. As reference standards, (a) mean citation counts for the journal set provided by Thomson Reuters corresponding to the field chemistry and (b) specific reference standards that refer to the subject areas of Chemical Abstracts were used. When compared to reference standards, the mean impact on chemical research is for the most part far above average not only for accepted Communications but also for rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications. However, average and below-average scientific impact is to be expected significantly less frequently for accepted Communications than for rejected Communications. All in all, the results of this study confirm that peer review at AC-IE is able to select the best scientific work with the highest impact on chemical research.
  20. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01 
    0.005388567 = product of:
  0.021554269 = sum of:
    0.021554269 = product of:
      0.043108538 = sum of:
        0.043108538 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043108538 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15917146 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0454538 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22

Authors

Types

  • a 22
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes