Search (100 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007) 0.08
    0.08258697 = product of:
      0.123880446 = sum of:
        0.11726358 = weight(_text_:sociology in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11726358 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.38452733 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
        0.006616868 = product of:
          0.013233736 = sum of:
            0.013233736 = weight(_text_:of in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013233736 = score(doc=337,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.19316542 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We use a new data gathering method, "Web/URL citation," Web/URL and Google Scholar to compare traditional and Web-based citation patterns across multiple disciplines (biology, chemistry, physics, computing, sociology, economics, psychology, and education) based upon a sample of 1,650 articles from 108 open access (OA) journals published in 2001. A Web/URL citation of an online journal article is a Web mention of its title, URL, or both. For each discipline, except psychology, we found significant correlations between Thomson Scientific (formerly Thomson ISI, here: ISI) citations and both Google Scholar and Google Web/URL citations. Google Scholar citations correlated more highly with ISI citations than did Google Web/URL citations, indicating that the Web/URL method measures a broader type of citation phenomenon. Google Scholar citations were more numerous than ISI citations in computer science and the four social science disciplines, suggesting that Google Scholar is more comprehensive for social sciences and perhaps also when conference articles are valued and published online. We also found large disciplinary differences in the percentage overlap between ISI and Google Scholar citation sources. Finally, although we found many significant trends, there were also numerous exceptions, suggesting that replacing traditional citation sources with the Web or Google Scholar for research impact calculations would be problematic.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.7, S.1055-1065
  2. Chen, C.: Mapping scientific frontiers : the quest for knowledge visualization (2003) 0.07
    0.070587926 = product of:
      0.105881885 = sum of:
        0.093810864 = weight(_text_:sociology in 2213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093810864 = score(doc=2213,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.30762187 = fieldWeight in 2213, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2213)
        0.012071025 = product of:
          0.02414205 = sum of:
            0.02414205 = weight(_text_:of in 2213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02414205 = score(doc=2213,freq=52.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.35238793 = fieldWeight in 2213, product of:
                  7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
                    52.0 = termFreq=52.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2213)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 55(2004) no.4, S.363-365 (J.W. Schneider): "Theories and methods for mapping scientific frontiers have existed for decades-especially within quantitative studies of science. This book investigates mapping scientific frontiers from the perspective of visual thinking and visual exploration (visual communication). The central theme is construction of visual-spatial representations that may convey insights into the dynamic structure of scientific frontiers. The author's previous book, Information Visualisation and Virtual Environments (1999), also concerns some of the ideas behind and possible benefits of visual communication. This new book takes a special focus an knowledge visualization, particularly in relation to science literature. The book is not a technical tutorial as the focus is an principles of visual communication and ways that may reveal the dynamics of scientific frontiers. The new approach to science mapping presented is the culmination of different approaches from several disciplines, such as philosophy of science, information retrieval, scientometrics, domain analysis, and information visualization. The book therefore addresses an audience with different disciplinary backgrounds and tries to stimulate interdisciplinary research. Chapter 1, The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, introduces a range of examples that illustrate fundamental issues concerning visual communication in general and science mapping in particular. Chapter 2, Mapping the Universe, focuses an the basic principles of cartography for visual communication. Chapter 3, Mapping the Mind, turns the attention inward and explores the design of mind maps, maps that represent our thoughts, experience, and knowledge. Chapter 4, Enabling Techniques for Science Mapping, essentially outlines the author's basic approach to science mapping.
    The title of Chapter 5, On the Shoulders of Giants, implies that knowledge of the structure of scientific frontiers in the immediate past holds the key to a fruitful exploration of people's intellectual assets. Chapter 6, Tracing Competing Paradigms explains how information visualization can draw upon the philosophical framework of paradigm shifts and thereby enable scientists to track the development of Competing paradigms. The final chapter, Tracking Latent Domain Knowledge, turns citation analysis upside down by looking at techniques that may reveal latent domain knowledge. Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization is an excellent book and is highly recommended. The book convincingly outlines general theories conceming cartography, visual communication, and science mapping-especially how metaphors can make a "big picture"simple and useful. The author likewise Shows how the GSA framework is based not only an technical possibilities but indeed also an the visualization principles presented in the beginning chapters. Also, the author does a fine job of explaining why the mapping of scientific frontiers needs a combined effort from a diverse range of underlying disciplines, such as philosophy of science, sociology of science, scientometrics, domain analyses, information visualization, knowledge discovery, and data mining.
  3. Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004) 0.07
    0.06959857 = product of:
      0.104397856 = sum of:
        0.093810864 = weight(_text_:sociology in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093810864 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.30762187 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
        0.010586989 = product of:
          0.021173978 = sum of:
            0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021173978 = score(doc=3093,freq=40.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
                  6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                    40.0 = termFreq=40.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    How do authors refer to Web-based information sources in their formal scientific publications? It is not yet weIl known how scientists and scholars actually include new types of information sources, available through the new media, in their published work. This article reports an a comparative study of the lists of references in 38 scientific journals in five different scientific and social scientific fields. The fields are sociology, library and information science, biochemistry and biotechnology, neuroscience, and the mathematics of computing. As is weIl known, references, citations, and hyperlinks play different roles in academic publishing and communication. Our study focuses an hyperlinks as attributes of references in formal scholarly publications. The study developed and applied a method to analyze the differential roles of publishing media in the analysis of scientific and scholarly literature references. The present secondary databases that include reference and citation data (the Web of Science) cannot be used for this type of research. By the automated processing and analysis of the full text of scientific and scholarly articles, we were able to extract the references and hyperlinks contained in these references in relation to other features of the scientific and scholarly literature. Our findings show that hyperlinking references are indeed, as expected, abundantly present in the formal literature. They also tend to cite more recent literature than the average reference. The large majority of the references are to Web instances of traditional scientific journals. Other types of Web-based information sources are less weIl represented in the lists of references, except in the case of pure e-journals. We conclude that this can be explained by taking the role of the publisher into account. Indeed, it seems that the shift from print-based to electronic publishing has created new roles for the publisher. By shaping the way scientific references are hyperlinking to other information sources, the publisher may have a large impact an the availability of scientific and scholarly information.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.14, S.1250-1260
  4. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.07
    0.06700444 = product of:
      0.10050666 = sum of:
        0.093810864 = weight(_text_:sociology in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093810864 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.30762187 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.0066958 = product of:
          0.0133916 = sum of:
            0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0133916 = score(doc=3585,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Biblio/sciento/infor-metrics : terminological issues and early historical developments -- The empirical foundations of bibliometrics : the Science citation index -- The philosophical foundations of bibliometrics : Bernal, Merton, Price, Garfield, and Small -- The mathematical foundations of bibliometrics -- Maps and paradigms : bibliographic citations at the service of the history and sociology of science -- Impact factor and the evaluation of scientists : bibliographic citations at the service of science policy and management -- On the shoulders of dwarfs : citation as rhetorical device and the criticisms to the normative model -- Measuring scientific communication in the twentieth century : from bibliometrics to cybermetrics.
  5. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.04
    0.037970424 = product of:
      0.11391127 = sum of:
        0.11391127 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.09497269 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09497269 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  6. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.03
    0.031927135 = product of:
      0.0957814 = sum of:
        0.0957814 = sum of:
          0.0118366135 = weight(_text_:of in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0118366135 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.08394479 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08394479 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  7. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.02
    0.024640482 = product of:
      0.07392144 = sum of:
        0.07392144 = sum of:
          0.023554565 = weight(_text_:of in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023554565 = score(doc=2763,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.05036688 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05036688 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.02
    0.022584006 = product of:
      0.06775202 = sum of:
        0.06775202 = sum of:
          0.02620146 = weight(_text_:of in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02620146 = score(doc=5269,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This comparative case study of the diffusion and nondiffusion over time of eight theories in the social sciences uses citation analysis, citation context analysis, content analysis, surveys of editorial review boards, and personal interviews with theorists to develop a model of the theory functions that facilitate theory diffusion throughout specific intellectual communities. Unlike previous work on the diffusion of theories as innovations, this theory functions model differs in several important respects from the findings of previous studies that employed Everett Rogers's classic typology of innovation characteristics that promote diffusion. The model is also presented as a contribution to a more integrated theory of citation.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.330-341
  9. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.02
    0.020615373 = product of:
      0.06184612 = sum of:
        0.06184612 = sum of:
          0.020295564 = weight(_text_:of in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020295564 = score(doc=6920,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Over a 35-year period, Irving H. Sher played a critical role in the development and implementation of the Science Citation Index and other ISI products. Trained as a biochemist, statistician, and linguist, Sher brought a unique combination of talents to ISI as Director of Quality Control and Director of Research and Development. His talents as a teacher and mentor evoked loyalty. He was a particularly inventive but self-taught programmer. In addition to the SCI, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index,
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
  10. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.02
    0.019357719 = product of:
      0.058073156 = sum of:
        0.058073156 = sum of:
          0.022458395 = weight(_text_:of in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022458395 = score(doc=2064,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03561476 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper attempts to provide an alternative method for measuring the importance of scientific papers based on the Google's PageRank. The method is a meaningful extension of the common integer counting of citations and is then experimented for bringing PageRank to the citation analysis in a large citation network. It offers a more integrated picture of the publications' influence in a specific field. We firstly calculate the PageRanks of scientific papers. The distributional characteristics and comparison with the traditionally used number of citations are then analyzed in detail. Furthermore, the PageRank is implemented in the evaluation of research influence for several countries in the field of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology during the time period of 2000-2005. Finally, some advantages of bringing PageRank to the citation analysis are concluded.
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  11. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.02
    0.018567387 = product of:
      0.055702157 = sum of:
        0.055702157 = sum of:
          0.020087399 = weight(_text_:of in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020087399 = score(doc=201,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03561476 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
  12. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.02
    0.018134935 = product of:
      0.054404803 = sum of:
        0.054404803 = sum of:
          0.018790042 = weight(_text_:of in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018790042 = score(doc=994,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03561476 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  13. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.013604727 = product of:
      0.04081418 = sum of:
        0.04081418 = sum of:
          0.017071007 = weight(_text_:of in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017071007 = score(doc=5171,freq=26.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2491759 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                  26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.023743173 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023743173 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
  14. Meadows, A.J.: ¬The citation characteristics of astronomical research literature (2004) 0.00
    0.0047837105 = product of:
      0.014351131 = sum of:
        0.014351131 = product of:
          0.028702263 = sum of:
            0.028702263 = weight(_text_:of in 4416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028702263 = score(doc=4416,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 4416, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The citation characteristics of papers in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (especially for the years 1963-1965) have been examined as a means of studying the usage of astronomical literature in the UK. The decrease of usage with age has been investigated and the decay half-life determined. Particular attention has been paid to the immediacy effect, and to its possible variation in different sub-fields of astronomy. The citations have also been separated according to journal of origin. As a result of this study, a quantitative estimate has been made of the titles and backruns that are required to satisfy a given percentage of the demand for astronomical research literature in this country.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 60(2004) no.6, S.597-600
  15. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007) 0.00
    0.004626554 = product of:
      0.013879661 = sum of:
        0.013879661 = product of:
          0.027759323 = sum of:
            0.027759323 = weight(_text_:of in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027759323 = score(doc=444,freq=44.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.40518725 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
                  6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                    44.0 = termFreq=44.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Scientists may seek to report a single definable body of research in more than one publication, that is, in repeated reports of the same work or in fractional reports, in order to disseminate their research as widely as possible in the scientific community. Up to now, however, it has not been examined whether this strategy of "multiple publication" in fact leads to greater reception of the research. In the present study, we investigate the influence of number of articles reporting the results of a single study on reception in the scientific community (total citation counts of an article on a single study). Our data set consists of 96 applicants for a research fellowship from the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (BIF), an international foundation for the promotion of basic research in biomedicine. The applicants reported to us all articles that they had published within the framework of their doctoral research projects. On this single project, the applicants had published from 1 to 16 articles (M = 4; Mdn = 3). The results of a regression model with an interaction term show that the practice of multiple publication of research study results does in fact lead to greater reception of the research (higher total citation counts) in the scientific community. However, reception is dependent upon length of article: the longer the article, the more total citation counts increase with the number of articles. Thus, it pays for scientists to practice multiple publication of study results in the form of sizable reports.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.8, S.1100-1107
  16. Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002) 0.00
    0.0045800544 = product of:
      0.013740162 = sum of:
        0.013740162 = product of:
          0.027480325 = sum of:
            0.027480325 = weight(_text_:of in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027480325 = score(doc=1249,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Can the inclusion of new journals in the Science Citation Index be used for the indication of structural change in the database, and how can this change be compared with reorganizations of reiations among previously included journals? Change in the number of journals (n) is distinguished from change in the number of journal categories (m). Although the number of journals can be considered as a given at each moment in time, the number of journal categories is based an a reconstruction that is time-stamped ex post. The reflexive reconstruction is in need of an update when new information becomes available in a next year. Implications of this shift towards an evolutionary perspective are specified.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.12, S.987-994
  17. Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: ¬The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages : an investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university (2003) 0.00
    0.0045800544 = product of:
      0.013740162 = sum of:
        0.013740162 = product of:
          0.027480325 = sum of:
            0.027480325 = weight(_text_:of in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027480325 = score(doc=1676,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Results from recent advances in link metrics have demonstrated that the hyperlink structure of national university systems can be strongly related to the research productivity of the individual institutions. This paper uses a page categorization to show that restricting the metrics to subsets more closely related to the research of the host university can produce even stronger associations. A partial overlap was also found between the effects of applying advanced document models and separating page types, but the best results were achieved through a combination of the two.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.7, S.594-602
  18. Chen, C.; Cribbin, T.; Macredie, R.; Morar, S.: Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms : two case studies (2002) 0.00
    0.004428855 = product of:
      0.013286565 = sum of:
        0.013286565 = product of:
          0.02657313 = sum of:
            0.02657313 = weight(_text_:of in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02657313 = score(doc=602,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.38787308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article we demonstrate the use of an integrative approach to visualizing and tracking the development of scientific paradigms. This approach is designed to reveal the long-term process of competing scientific paradigms. We assume that a cluster of highly cited and cocited scientific publications in a cocitation network represents the core of a predominant scientific paradigm. The growth of a paradigm is depicted and animated through the rise of citation rates and the movement of its core cluster towards the center of the cocitation network. We study two cases of competing scientific paradigms in the real world: (1) the causes of mass extinctions, and (2) the connections between mad cow disease and a new variant of a brain disease in humans-vCJD. Various theoretical and practical issues concerning this approach are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.8, S.678.689
  19. Chen, C.; Paul, R.J.; O'Keefe, B.: Fitting the Jigsaw of citation : information visualization in domain analysis (2001) 0.00
    0.004267752 = product of:
      0.012803256 = sum of:
        0.012803256 = product of:
          0.025606511 = sum of:
            0.025606511 = weight(_text_:of in 5766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025606511 = score(doc=5766,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 5766, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Domain visualization is one of the new research fronts resulted from the proliferation of information visualization, aiming to reveal the essence of a knowledge domain. Information visualization plays an integral role in modeling and representing intellectual structures associated with scientific disciplines. In this article, the domain of computer graphics is visualized based on author cocitation patterns derived from an 18-year span of the prestigious IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (1982-1999). This domain visualization utilizes a series of visualization and animation techniques, including author cocitation maps, citation time lines, animation of a highdimensional specialty space, and institutional profiles. This approach not only augments traditional domain analysis and the understanding of scientific disciplines, but also produces a persistent and shared knowledge space for researchers to keep track the development of knowledge more effectively. The results of the domain visualization are discussed and triangulated in a broader context of the computer graphics field
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.4, S.315-330
  20. Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: Bibliometric maps of field of science (2005) 0.00
    0.004267752 = product of:
      0.012803256 = sum of:
        0.012803256 = product of:
          0.025606511 = sum of:
            0.025606511 = weight(_text_:of in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025606511 = score(doc=1069,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The present paper is devoted to two directions in algorithmic classificatory procedures: the journal co-citation analysis as an example of citation networks and lexical analysis of keywords in the titles and texts. What is common to those approaches is the general idea of normalization of deviations of the observed data from the mathematical expectation. The application of the same formula leads to discovery of statistically significant links between objects (journals in one case, keywords - in the other). The results of the journal co-citation analysis are reflected in tables and map for field "Women's Studies" and for field "Information Science and Library Science". An experimental attempt at establishing textual links between words was carried out on two samples from SSCI Data base: (1) EDUCATION and (2) ETHICS. The EDUCATION file included 2180 documents (of which 751 had abstracts); the ETHICS file included 807 documents (289 abstracts). Some examples of the results of this pilot study are given in tabular form . The binary links between words discovered in this way may form triplets or other groups with more than two member words.

Authors

Types

  • a 97
  • m 3
  • el 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications