-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.02
0.019717554 = product of:
0.09858777 = sum of:
0.09858777 = sum of:
0.06403102 = weight(_text_:management in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06403102 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034556746 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.013314451 = product of:
0.06657226 = sum of:
0.06657226 = sum of:
0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03201551 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034556746 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.009215132 = product of:
0.04607566 = sum of:
0.04607566 = product of:
0.09215132 = sum of:
0.09215132 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09215132 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.008145103 = product of:
0.040725514 = sum of:
0.040725514 = product of:
0.08145103 = sum of:
0.08145103 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08145103 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002)
0.01
0.007470285 = product of:
0.037351426 = sum of:
0.037351426 = product of:
0.07470285 = sum of:
0.07470285 = weight(_text_:management in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07470285 = score(doc=2584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.491-508
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.00
0.0048870626 = product of:
0.024435312 = sum of:
0.024435312 = product of:
0.048870623 = sum of:
0.048870623 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048870623 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.00
0.004621041 = product of:
0.023105204 = sum of:
0.023105204 = product of:
0.04621041 = sum of:
0.04621041 = weight(_text_:management in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04621041 = score(doc=5767,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
-
Lai, K.-K.; Wu, S.-J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system (2005)
0.00
0.004621041 = product of:
0.023105204 = sum of:
0.023105204 = product of:
0.04621041 = sum of:
0.04621041 = weight(_text_:management in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04621041 = score(doc=1013,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The paper proposes a new approach to create a patent classification system to replace the IPC or UPC system for conducting patent analysis and management. The new approach is based on co-citation analysis of bibliometrics. The traditional approach for management of patents, which is based on either the IPC or UPC, is too general to meet the needs of specific industries. In addition, some patents are placed in incorrect categories, making it difficult for enterprises to carry out R&D planning, technology positioning, patent strategy-making and technology forecasting. Therefore, it is essential to develop a patent classification system that is adaptive to the characteristics of a specific industry. The analysis of this approach is divided into three phases. Phase I selects appropriate databases to conduct patent searches according to the subject and objective of this study and then select basic patents. Phase II uses the co-cited frequency of the basic patent pairs to assess their similarity. Phase III uses factor analysis to establish a classification system and assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The main contribution of this approach is to develop a patent classification system based on patent similarities to assist patent manager in understanding the basic patents for a specific industry, the relationships among categories of technologies and the evolution of a technology category.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.313-330
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.00
0.0042687347 = product of:
0.021343673 = sum of:
0.021343673 = product of:
0.042687345 = sum of:
0.042687345 = weight(_text_:management in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042687345 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1395-1402
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.00
0.0040316205 = product of:
0.0201581 = sum of:
0.0201581 = product of:
0.0403162 = sum of:
0.0403162 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0403162 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.00
0.0040316205 = product of:
0.0201581 = sum of:
0.0201581 = product of:
0.0403162 = sum of:
0.0403162 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0403162 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.00
0.0037351425 = product of:
0.018675713 = sum of:
0.018675713 = product of:
0.037351426 = sum of:
0.037351426 = weight(_text_:management in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037351426 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1403-1418
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.00
0.0034556747 = product of:
0.017278373 = sum of:
0.017278373 = product of:
0.034556746 = sum of:
0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034556746 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Tho, Q.T.; Hui, S.C.; Fong, A.C.M.: ¬A citation-based document retrieval system for finding research expertise (2007)
0.00
0.003201551 = product of:
0.016007755 = sum of:
0.016007755 = product of:
0.03201551 = sum of:
0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03201551 = score(doc=956,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 956, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=956)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.1, S.248-264
-
Sidiropoulos, A.; Manolopoulos, Y.: ¬A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries (2005)
0.00
0.003201551 = product of:
0.016007755 = sum of:
0.016007755 = product of:
0.03201551 = sum of:
0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03201551 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.289-312
-
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: Bibliometric maps of field of science (2005)
0.00
0.003201551 = product of:
0.016007755 = sum of:
0.016007755 = product of:
0.03201551 = sum of:
0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03201551 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1534-1547
-
Lin, X.; White, H.D.; Buzydlowski, J.: Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching (2003)
0.00
0.003201551 = product of:
0.016007755 = sum of:
0.016007755 = product of:
0.03201551 = sum of:
0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03201551 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.5, S.689-706
-
Joint, N.: Bemused by bibliometrics : using citation analysis to evaluate research quality (2008)
0.00
0.002667959 = product of:
0.013339795 = sum of:
0.013339795 = product of:
0.02667959 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=1900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the way in which library and information science (LIS) issues have been handled in the formulation of recent UK Higher Education policy concerned with research quality evaluation. Design/methodology/approach - A chronological review of decision making about digital rights arrangements for the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), and of recent announcements about the new shape of metrics-based assessment in the Research Excellence Framework, which supersedes the RAE. Against this chronological framework, the likely nature of LIS practitioner reactions to the flow of decision making is suggested. Findings - It was found that a weak grasp of LIS issues by decision makers undermines the process whereby effective research evaluation models are created. LIS professional opinion should be sampled before key decisions are made. Research limitations/implications - This paper makes no sophisticated comments on the complex research issues underlying advanced bibliometric research evaluation models. It does point out that sophisticated and expensive bibliometric consultancies arrive at many conclusions about metrics-based research assessment that are common knowledge amongst LIS practitioners. Practical implications - Practical difficulties arise when one announces a decision to move to a new and specific type of research evaluation indicator before one has worked out anything very specific about that indicator. Originality/value - In this paper, the importance of information management issues to the mainstream issues of government and public administration is underlined. The most valuable conclusion of this paper is that, because LIS issues are now at the heart of democratic decision making, LIS practitioners and professionals should be given some sort of role in advising on such matters.
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.00
0.002303783 = product of:
0.011518915 = sum of:
0.011518915 = product of:
0.02303783 = sum of:
0.02303783 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02303783 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008)
0.00
0.0021343674 = product of:
0.010671836 = sum of:
0.010671836 = product of:
0.021343673 = sum of:
0.021343673 = weight(_text_:management in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021343673 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Inhalt: Biblio/sciento/infor-metrics : terminological issues and early historical developments -- The empirical foundations of bibliometrics : the Science citation index -- The philosophical foundations of bibliometrics : Bernal, Merton, Price, Garfield, and Small -- The mathematical foundations of bibliometrics -- Maps and paradigms : bibliographic citations at the service of the history and sociology of science -- Impact factor and the evaluation of scientists : bibliographic citations at the service of science policy and management -- On the shoulders of dwarfs : citation as rhetorical device and the criticisms to the normative model -- Measuring scientific communication in the twentieth century : from bibliometrics to cybermetrics.
