Search (235 results, page 2 of 12)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science : a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas (1955) 0.00 
    0.0031332558 = product of:
  0.0062665115 = sum of:
    0.0062665115 = product of:
      0.012533023 = sum of:
        0.012533023 = weight(_text_:a in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012533023 = score(doc=4342,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  2. Malin, M.V.: ¬The Science Citation Index : a new concept in indexing (1968) 0.00 
    0.0031332558 = product of:
  0.0062665115 = sum of:
    0.0062665115 = product of:
      0.012533023 = sum of:
        0.012533023 = weight(_text_:a in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012533023 = score(doc=5000,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  3. Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987) 0.00 
    0.0031332558 = product of:
  0.0062665115 = sum of:
    0.0062665115 = product of:
      0.012533023 = sum of:
        0.012533023 = weight(_text_:a in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012533023 = score(doc=5656,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  4. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis : a critical review (1989) 0.00 
    0.0031332558 = product of:
  0.0062665115 = sum of:
    0.0062665115 = product of:
      0.012533023 = sum of:
        0.012533023 = weight(_text_:a in 6901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012533023 = score(doc=6901,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 6901, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6901)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  5. McCain, K.W.: Mapping authors in intellectual space : a technical overview (1990) 0.00 
    0.0031332558 = product of:
  0.0062665115 = sum of:
    0.0062665115 = product of:
      0.012533023 = sum of:
        0.012533023 = weight(_text_:a in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012533023 = score(doc=6903,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  6. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Quantitative measures of communication in science : a study of the formal level (1986) 0.00 
    0.0031332558 = product of:
  0.0062665115 = sum of:
    0.0062665115 = product of:
      0.012533023 = sum of:
        0.012533023 = weight(_text_:a in 7777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012533023 = score(doc=7777,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 7777, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7777)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  7. Fujigaki, Y.: ¬The citation system : citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation (1998) 0.00 
    0.0029308924 = product of:
  0.005861785 = sum of:
    0.005861785 = product of:
      0.01172357 = sum of:
        0.01172357 = weight(_text_:a in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01172357 = score(doc=5129,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    States that it can be shown that claims of a lack of theories of citation are also indicative of a great need for a theory which links science dynamics and measurement. There is a wide gap between qualitative (science dynamics) and quantitative (measurement) approaches. To link them, proposes the use of the citation system, that potentially bridges a gap between measurement and epistemology, by applying system theory to the publication system
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
    Type
    a
  8. Bayer, A.E.; Smart, J.C.; McLaughlin, G.W.: Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations (1990) 0.00 
    0.0027415988 = product of:
  0.0054831975 = sum of:
    0.0054831975 = product of:
      0.010966395 = sum of:
        0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010966395 = score(doc=338,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  9. Peritz, B.C.: ¬A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields (1983) 0.00 
    0.0027415988 = product of:
  0.0054831975 = sum of:
    0.0054831975 = product of:
      0.010966395 = sum of:
        0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010966395 = score(doc=3073,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  10. McCain, K.W.: Co-cited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure (1986) 0.00 
    0.0027415988 = product of:
  0.0054831975 = sum of:
    0.0054831975 = product of:
      0.010966395 = sum of:
        0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 5505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010966395 = score(doc=5505,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 5505, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5505)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  11. He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002) 0.00 
    0.0027415988 = product of:
  0.0054831975 = sum of:
    0.0054831975 = product of:
      0.010966395 = sum of:
        0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010966395 = score(doc=2584,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  12. Fong, A.C.M.: Mining a Web citation database for document clustering (2002) 0.00 
    0.0027415988 = product of:
  0.0054831975 = sum of:
    0.0054831975 = product of:
      0.010966395 = sum of:
        0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 3940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010966395 = score(doc=3940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  13. Sen, B.K.; Pandalai, T.A.; Karanjai, A.: Ranking of scientists - a new approach (1998) 0.00 
    0.0027134789 = product of:
  0.0054269577 = sum of:
    0.0054269577 = product of:
      0.0108539155 = sum of:
        0.0108539155 = weight(_text_:a in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0108539155 = score(doc=5113,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A formula for the ranking of scientists based on diachronous citation counts is proposed. The paper generalises the fact that the citation generation potential (CGP) is not the same for all papers, it differs from paper to paper, and also to a certain extent depends on the subject domain of the papers. The method of ranking proposed in no way replaces peer review. It merely acts as an aid for peers to help them arrive at a better judgement.
    Type
    a
  14. Yoon, L.L.: ¬The performance of cited references as an approach to information retrieval (1994) 0.00 
    0.0025645308 = product of:
  0.0051290616 = sum of:
    0.0051290616 = product of:
      0.010258123 = sum of:
        0.010258123 = weight(_text_:a in 8219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010258123 = score(doc=8219,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 8219, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Explores the relationship between the number of cited references used in a citation search and retrieval effectiveness. Focuses on analysing in terms of information retrieval effectiveness, the overlap among posting sets retrieved by various combinations of cited references. Findings from three case studies show the more cited references used for a citation search, the better the performance, in terms of retrieving more relevant documents, up to a point of diminishing returns. The overall level of overlap among relevant documents sets was found to be low. If only some of the cited references among many candidates are used for a citation search, a significant proportion of relevant documents may be missed. The characteristics of cited references showed that some variables are good indicators to predict relevance to a given question
    Type
    a
  15. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.00 
    0.002477056 = product of:
  0.004954112 = sum of:
    0.004954112 = product of:
      0.009908224 = sum of:
        0.009908224 = weight(_text_:a in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009908224 = score(doc=1606,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article discusses the rationale for creating historiographs of scholarly topics using a new program called HistCite(TM), which produces a variety of analyses to aid the historian identify key events (papers), people (authors), and journals in a field. By creating a genealogic profile of the evolution, the program aids the scholar in evaluating the paradigm involved.
    Type
    a
  16. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.00 
    0.002477056 = product of:
  0.004954112 = sum of:
    0.004954112 = product of:
      0.009908224 = sum of:
        0.009908224 = weight(_text_:a in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009908224 = score(doc=3765,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
    Type
    a
  17. Kostoff, R.N.: ¬The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation (1998) 0.00 
    0.002477056 = product of:
  0.004954112 = sum of:
    0.004954112 = product of:
      0.009908224 = sum of:
        0.009908224 = weight(_text_:a in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009908224 = score(doc=4129,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Leydesdorff, in his 1998 paper 'Theories of citation?', addresses the history of citations and citation analysis, and the transformation of a reference mechanism into a purportedly quantitative measure of research impact/quality. Examines different facets of citations and citation analysis, and discusses the validity of citation analysis as a useful measure of research impact/quality
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
    Type
    a
  18. Harter, S.P.; Nisonger, T.E.; Weng, A.: Semantic relationsships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals (1993) 0.00 
    0.0023983994 = product of:
  0.004796799 = sum of:
    0.004796799 = product of:
      0.009593598 = sum of:
        0.009593598 = weight(_text_:a in 5644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009593598 = score(doc=5644,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 5644, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The act of referencing another author's work in a scholarly or research paper is usually assumed to signal a direct semantic relationship between the citing and cited work. The present article reports a study that examines this assumption directly. The purpose of the research is to investigate the semantic relationship between citing and cited documents for a sample of document pairs in three journals in library and information science: 'Library journal', 'College and research libraries' and 'Journal of the American Society for Information Science'. A macroanalysis, absed on a comparison of the Library of Congress class numbers assigned citing and cited documents, and a microanalysis, based on a comparison of descriptors assigned citing and cited documents by three indexing and abstracting journals, ERIC, LISA and LiLi, were conducted. Both analyses suggest that the subject similarity among pairs of cited and citing documents is typically very small, supporting a subjective, psychological view of relevance and a trial-and-error, heuristic understanding of the information search and research processes. The results of the study have implications for collection development, for an understanding of psychological relevance, and for the results of doing information retrieval using cited references. Several intriguing methodological questions are raised for future research, including the role of indexing depth, specifity, and quality on the measurement of document similarity
    Type
    a
  19. Pichappan, P.: Levels of citation relation between papers (1996) 0.00 
    0.0023983994 = product of:
  0.004796799 = sum of:
    0.004796799 = product of:
      0.009593598 = sum of:
        0.009593598 = weight(_text_:a in 5725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009593598 = score(doc=5725,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 5725, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5725)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Proposes a typology for measuring the levels of citation relations netween papers. Introduces a new family of citation based classification schemes and outlines the typology that can be seen as being analogous to Ranganathan's APUPA pattern in subject mapping
    Type
    a
  20. Magri, M.; Solari, A.: ¬The SCI Journal Citation Reports : a potential tool for studying journals? (1996) 0.00 
    0.002374294 = product of:
  0.004748588 = sum of:
    0.004748588 = product of:
      0.009497176 = sum of:
        0.009497176 = weight(_text_:a in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009497176 = score(doc=5076,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Analyses 6 indicators of the Science Citation Index Journals Citation Reports over a 19 year period: number of total citations, number of citations to the previous 2 years, number of source items, impact factor, immediacy index and cited half life. Proposes a box plot method to aggregate the values of each indicator so as to obtain at a glance portrayals of the JCR population from 1974 to 1993. This 'rereading' of the JCR, which presents the JCR product differently, makes it possible to shed new light on the large sub population of journals not at the top of the rankings
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 233
  • el 6
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications