Search (241 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.03 
    0.03259639 = product of:
  0.054327313 = sum of:
    0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00743023 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
    0.00835694 = weight(_text_:a in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00835694 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
    0.038540144 = product of:
      0.07708029 = sum of:
        0.07708029 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07708029 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
    Source
    Mathematical intelligencer. 14(1992), no.4, S.4-5
    Type
    a
  2. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.03 
    0.027542893 = product of:
  0.06885723 = sum of:
    0.009287788 = weight(_text_:s in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009287788 = score(doc=461,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.24024783 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
    0.059569445 = weight(_text_:u in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059569445 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.5116319 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
    Pages
    564 S
    Type
    s
  3. Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996) 0.02 
    0.024546914 = product of:
  0.04091152 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
    0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029485371 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
    0.008175425 = weight(_text_:a in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008175425 = score(doc=3044,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Reports recent experiences with the publishing, via the Internet and WWW of ISI's biweekly newspaper, The Scientist; which was originally mounted on the NSFnet. Compares the use of the Internet for SDI by comparing Web searches via AltaVista with similar searches on CD-ROM. Predicts that future current awareness services and SDI services will be linked to electronic periodicals in electronic libraries. Concludes with a note on cited reference searching, a variation on the theme of hypertext searching, with particular reference to SCI and Web crawlers
    Pages
    S.202-222
    Source
    Towards a worldwide library: a ten year forecast. Proceedings of the 19th International Essen Symposium, 23-26 Sept 1996. Ed.: A.H. Helal u. J.W. Weiss
    Type
    a
  4. Feitelson, D.G.; Yovel, U.: Predictive ranking of computer scientists using CiteSeer data (2004) 0.02 
    0.022744015 = product of:
  0.03790669 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
    0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029485371 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
    0.0051705935 = weight(_text_:a in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051705935 = score(doc=1259,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The increasing availability of digital libraries with cross-citation data on the Internet enables new studies in bibliometrics. The paper focuses on the list of 10.000 top-cited authors in computer science available as part of CiteSeer. Using data from several consecutive lists a model of how authors accrue citations with time is constructed. By comparing the rate at which individual authors accrue citations with the average rate, predictions are made of how their ranking in the list will change in the future.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 60(2004) no.1, S.44-61
    Type
    a
  5. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02 
    0.018758833 = product of:
  0.046897084 = sum of:
    0.00835694 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00835694 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
    0.038540144 = product of:
      0.07708029 = sum of:
        0.07708029 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07708029 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
    Type
    a
  6. Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis : a study (2006) 0.02 
    0.018730536 = product of:
  0.031217558 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
    0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021060979 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
    0.007834632 = weight(_text_:a in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007834632 = score(doc=225,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Citation-chasing is proposed as a method of discovering additional terms to enhance subjectsearch retrieval. Subjects attached to OCLC records for cited works are compared to those attached to original citing sources. Citing sources were produced via a subject-list search in a library catalog using the LCSH "Language and languages-Origin." A subject-search was employed to avoid subjectivity in choosing sources. References from the sources were searched in OCLC where applicable, and the subject headings were retrieved. The subjects were ranked by citation-frequency and tiered into 3 groups in a Bradford-like distribution. Highly cited subjects were produced that were not revealed through the original search. A difference in relative importance among the subjects was also revealed. Broad extra-linguistic topics like evolution are more prominent than specific linguistic topics like phonology. There are exceptions, which appear somewhat predictable by the amount of imbalance in citation-representation among the 2 sources. Citation leaders were also produced for authors and secondary-source titles.
    Pages
    S.19-25
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  7. Safder, I.; Ali, M.; Aljohani, N.R.; Nawaz, R.; Hassan, S.-U.: Neural machine translation for in-text citation classification (2023) 0.02 
    0.018110579 = product of:
  0.030184297 = sum of:
    0.0032837286 = weight(_text_:s in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032837286 = score(doc=1053,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
    0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021060979 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
    0.00583959 = weight(_text_:a in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00583959 = score(doc=1053,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The quality of scientific publications can be measured by quantitative indices such as the h-index, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, or g-index. However, these measures lack to explain the function or reasons for citations and the context of citations from citing publication to cited publication. We argue that citation context may be considered while calculating the impact of research work. However, mining citation context from unstructured full-text publications is a challenging task. In this paper, we compiled a data set comprising 9,518 citations context. We developed a deep learning-based architecture for citation context classification. Unlike feature-based state-of-the-art models, our proposed focal-loss and class-weight-aware BiLSTM model with pretrained GloVe embedding vectors use citation context as input to outperform them in multiclass citation context classification tasks. Our model improves on the baseline state-of-the-art by achieving an F1 score of 0.80 with an accuracy of 0.81 for citation context classification. Moreover, we delve into the effects of using different word embeddings on the performance of the classification model and draw a comparison between fastText, GloVe, and spaCy pretrained word embeddings.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1229-1240
    Type
    a
  8. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.02 
    0.017871201 = product of:
  0.029785335 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
    0.009673295 = weight(_text_:a in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009673295 = score(doc=6920,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
    0.016861314 = product of:
      0.033722628 = sum of:
        0.033722628 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033722628 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Over a 35-year period, Irving H. Sher played a critical role in the development and implementation of the Science Citation Index and other ISI products. Trained as a biochemist, statistician, and linguist, Sher brought a unique combination of talents to ISI as Director of Quality Control and Director of Research and Development. His talents as a teacher and mentor evoked loyalty. He was a particularly inventive but self-taught programmer. In addition to the SCI, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index,
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
    Type
    a
  9. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.02 
    0.01697248 = product of:
  0.028287465 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
    0.008175425 = weight(_text_:a in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008175425 = score(doc=5269,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
    0.016861314 = product of:
      0.033722628 = sum of:
        0.033722628 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033722628 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    This comparative case study of the diffusion and nondiffusion over time of eight theories in the social sciences uses citation analysis, citation context analysis, content analysis, surveys of editorial review boards, and personal interviews with theorists to develop a model of the theory functions that facilitate theory diffusion throughout specific intellectual communities. Unlike previous work on the diffusion of theories as innovations, this theory functions model differs in several important respects from the findings of previous studies that employed Everett Rogers's classic typology of innovation characteristics that promote diffusion. The model is also presented as a contribution to a more integrated theory of citation.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.330-341
    Type
    a
  10. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.02 
    0.01598427 = product of:
  0.026640449 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
    0.009401558 = weight(_text_:a in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009401558 = score(doc=994,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
    Type
    a
  11. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.02 
    0.015815513 = product of:
  0.026359187 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
    0.0031338527 = weight(_text_:a in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031338527 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
    0.020438999 = product of:
      0.040877998 = sum of:
        0.040877998 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040877998 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
    Type
    a
  12. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.015715234 = product of:
  0.039288085 = sum of:
    0.0052230875 = weight(_text_:a in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052230875 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
    0.034064997 = product of:
      0.068129994 = sum of:
        0.068129994 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068129994 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
    Type
    a
  13. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01 
    0.01454784 = product of:
  0.024246398 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
    0.007007508 = weight(_text_:a in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007007508 = score(doc=2064,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The paper attempts to provide an alternative method for measuring the importance of scientific papers based on the Google's PageRank. The method is a meaningful extension of the common integer counting of citations and is then experimented for bringing PageRank to the citation analysis in a large citation network. It offers a more integrated picture of the publications' influence in a specific field. We firstly calculate the PageRanks of scientific papers. The distributional characteristics and comparison with the traditionally used number of citations are then analyzed in detail. Furthermore, the PageRank is implemented in the evaluation of research influence for several countries in the field of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology during the time period of 2000-2005. Finally, some advantages of bringing PageRank to the citation analysis are concluded.
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
    Type
    a
  14. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01 
    0.014292613 = product of:
  0.02382102 = sum of:
    0.0039404742 = weight(_text_:s in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0039404742 = score(doc=3692,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
    0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005427992 = score(doc=3692,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to examine the patterns of self citation in 6 disciplines distributed among the physical and social sciences and humanities. Sample articles were examined to deermine the relative numbers and ages of self citations and citations to other in the bibliographies and to the exposure given to each type of citation in the text of the articles. significant differences were found in the number and age of citations between disciplines. Overall, 9% of all citations were self citations; 15% of physical sciences citations were self citations, as opposed to 6% in the social sciences and 3% in the humanities. Within disciplines, there was no significantly different amount of coverage between self citations and citations to others. Overall, it appears that a lack of substantive differences in self citation behaviour is consistent across disciplines
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.431-435
    Type
    a
  15. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01 
    0.013600131 = product of:
  0.022666883 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
    0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005427992 = score(doc=4215,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.302-310
    Type
    a
  16. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.013600131 = product of:
  0.022666883 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
    0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005427992 = score(doc=201,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
    Type
    a
  17. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.01 
    0.013600131 = product of:
  0.022666883 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
    0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005427992 = score(doc=1521,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content-based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full-text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1820-1833
    Type
    a
  18. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.01 
    0.013293243 = product of:
  0.022155404 = sum of:
    0.0032173842 = weight(_text_:s in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032173842 = score(doc=3585,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
    0.016848784 = weight(_text_:u in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016848784 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
    0.002089235 = weight(_text_:a in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002089235 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
    Pages
    xxxi, 417 S
  19. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01 
    0.010613844 = product of:
  0.02653461 = sum of:
    0.009673295 = weight(_text_:a in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009673295 = score(doc=40,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
    0.016861314 = product of:
      0.033722628 = sum of:
        0.033722628 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033722628 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
    Type
    a
  20. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.010071728 = product of:
  0.025179321 = sum of:
    0.005909249 = weight(_text_:a in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005909249 = score(doc=1149,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
    0.019270072 = product of:
      0.038540144 = sum of:
        0.038540144 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038540144 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 233
  • el 7
  • m 5
  • s 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications