-
Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993)
0.02
0.015590616 = product of:
0.031181231 = sum of:
0.01644891 = product of:
0.03289782 = sum of:
0.03289782 = weight(_text_:online in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03289782 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014732323 = product of:
0.044196967 = sum of:
0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044196967 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Investigates the relative efficacy of searching by terms and by citations in searches collected in health science libraries. In pilot and field studies the odds that overlap items retrieved would be relevant or partially relevant were greatly improved. In the field setting citation searching was able to add average of 24% recall to traditional subject retrieval. Attempts to identify distinguishing characteristics in queries which might benefit most from additional citation searches proved inclusive. Online access of citation databases has been hampered by their high cost
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.02
0.015590616 = product of:
0.031181231 = sum of:
0.01644891 = product of:
0.03289782 = sum of:
0.03289782 = weight(_text_:online in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03289782 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014732323 = product of:
0.044196967 = sum of:
0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044196967 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- It has been shown (Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ads.harvard.edu) and from the ArXiv e-print archive at Cornell University (arXiv.org) we examine the causes of this effect.
- Date
- 27.12.2007 17:16:29
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.013911052 = product of:
0.027822103 = sum of:
0.0123366825 = product of:
0.024673365 = sum of:
0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024673365 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.015485421 = product of:
0.046456262 = sum of:
0.046456262 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046456262 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.01
0.009510912 = product of:
0.038043648 = sum of:
0.038043648 = product of:
0.076087296 = sum of:
0.076087296 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076087296 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.38160682 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0072998973 = product of:
0.029199589 = sum of:
0.029199589 = product of:
0.08759876 = sum of:
0.08759876 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08759876 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.01
0.0072998973 = product of:
0.029199589 = sum of:
0.029199589 = product of:
0.08759876 = sum of:
0.08759876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08759876 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.006452258 = product of:
0.025809033 = sum of:
0.025809033 = product of:
0.0774271 = sum of:
0.0774271 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0774271 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialities (1983)
0.01
0.0064453906 = product of:
0.025781563 = sum of:
0.025781563 = product of:
0.077344686 = sum of:
0.077344686 = weight(_text_:29 in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077344686 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993)
0.01
0.006232264 = product of:
0.024929056 = sum of:
0.024929056 = product of:
0.049858112 = sum of:
0.049858112 = weight(_text_:online in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049858112 = score(doc=7827,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
- Source
- Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting 1993, New York, 4-6 May 1993. Ed.: M.E. Williams
-
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998)
0.00
0.0046038507 = product of:
0.018415403 = sum of:
0.018415403 = product of:
0.055246208 = sum of:
0.055246208 = weight(_text_:29 in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055246208 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:19:32
-
Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.00
0.004361676 = product of:
0.017446704 = sum of:
0.017446704 = product of:
0.03489341 = sum of:
0.03489341 = weight(_text_:online in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489341 = score(doc=4593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.284522 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
- Content
- Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
-
Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006)
0.00
0.0036830807 = product of:
0.014732323 = sum of:
0.014732323 = product of:
0.044196967 = sum of:
0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044196967 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 8.2006 14:29:40
-
Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003)
0.00
0.0036830807 = product of:
0.014732323 = sum of:
0.014732323 = product of:
0.044196967 = sum of:
0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044196967 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:52:23
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.00
0.0036499486 = product of:
0.0145997945 = sum of:
0.0145997945 = product of:
0.04379938 = sum of:
0.04379938 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04379938 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals : an online mapping exercise (2007)
0.00
0.0036347301 = product of:
0.0145389205 = sum of:
0.0145389205 = product of:
0.029077841 = sum of:
0.029077841 = weight(_text_:online in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029077841 = score(doc=82,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Aggregated journal-journal citation networks based on the Journal Citation Reports 2004 of the Science Citation Index (5,968 journals) and the Social Science Citation Index (1,712 journals) are made accessible from the perspective of any of these journals. A vector-space model Is used for normalization, and the results are brought online at http://www.leydesdorff.net/jcr04 as input files for the visualization program Pajek. The user is thus able to analyze the citation environment in terms of links and graphs. Furthermore, the local impact of a journal is defined as its share of the total citations in the specific journal's citation environments; the vertical size of the nodes is varied proportionally to this citation impact. The horizontal size of each node can be used to provide the same information after correction for within-journal (self-)citations. In the "citing" environment, the equivalents of this measure can be considered as a citation activity index which maps how the relevant journal environment is perceived by the collective of authors of a given journal. As a policy application, the mechanism of Interdisciplinary developments among the sciences is elaborated for the case of nanotechnology journals.
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007)
0.00
0.0036347301 = product of:
0.0145389205 = sum of:
0.0145389205 = product of:
0.029077841 = sum of:
0.029077841 = weight(_text_:online in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029077841 = score(doc=337,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- We use a new data gathering method, "Web/URL citation," Web/URL and Google Scholar to compare traditional and Web-based citation patterns across multiple disciplines (biology, chemistry, physics, computing, sociology, economics, psychology, and education) based upon a sample of 1,650 articles from 108 open access (OA) journals published in 2001. A Web/URL citation of an online journal article is a Web mention of its title, URL, or both. For each discipline, except psychology, we found significant correlations between Thomson Scientific (formerly Thomson ISI, here: ISI) citations and both Google Scholar and Google Web/URL citations. Google Scholar citations correlated more highly with ISI citations than did Google Web/URL citations, indicating that the Web/URL method measures a broader type of citation phenomenon. Google Scholar citations were more numerous than ISI citations in computer science and the four social science disciplines, suggesting that Google Scholar is more comprehensive for social sciences and perhaps also when conference articles are valued and published online. We also found large disciplinary differences in the percentage overlap between ISI and Google Scholar citation sources. Finally, although we found many significant trends, there were also numerous exceptions, suggesting that replacing traditional citation sources with the Web or Google Scholar for research impact calculations would be problematic.
-
East, J.W.: Citations to conference papers and the implications for cataloging (1985)
0.00
0.0032226953 = product of:
0.012890781 = sum of:
0.012890781 = product of:
0.038672343 = sum of:
0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 7928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038672343 = score(doc=7928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 7928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7928)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 29(1985), S.189-194
-
Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003)
0.00
0.0032226953 = product of:
0.012890781 = sum of:
0.012890781 = product of:
0.038672343 = sum of:
0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038672343 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:51:59
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.00
0.003193705 = product of:
0.01277482 = sum of:
0.01277482 = product of:
0.03832446 = sum of:
0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03832446 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.00
0.003193705 = product of:
0.01277482 = sum of:
0.01277482 = product of:
0.03832446 = sum of:
0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03832446 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
