Search (76 results, page 4 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Lawrie, D.; Mayfield, J.; McNamee, P.; Oard, P.W.: Cross-language person-entity linking from 20 languages (2015) 0.01 
    0.00601736 = product of:
  0.01203472 = sum of:
    0.01203472 = product of:
      0.036104158 = sum of:
        0.036104158 = weight(_text_:22 in 1848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036104158 = score(doc=1848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1848)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The goal of entity linking is to associate references to an entity that is found in unstructured natural language content to an authoritative inventory of known entities. This article describes the construction of 6 test collections for cross-language person-entity linking that together span 22 languages. Fully automated components were used together with 2 crowdsourced validation stages to affordably generate ground-truth annotations with an accuracy comparable to that of a completely manual process. The resulting test collections each contain between 642 (Arabic) and 2,361 (Romanian) person references in non-English texts for which the correct resolution in English Wikipedia is known, plus a similar number of references for which no correct resolution into English Wikipedia is believed to exist. Fully automated cross-language person-name linking experiments with 20 non-English languages yielded a resolution accuracy of between 0.84 (Serbian) and 0.98 (Romanian), which compares favorably with previously reported cross-language entity linking results for Spanish.
  2. Herrera-Viedma, E.: Modeling the retrieval process for an information retrieval system using an ordinal fuzzy linguistic approach (2001) 0.01 
    0.0050599845 = product of:
  0.010119969 = sum of:
    0.010119969 = product of:
      0.030359907 = sum of:
        0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 5752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030359907 = score(doc=5752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5752)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:00:25
  3. Li, W.; Wong, K.-F.; Yuan, C.: Toward automatic Chinese temporal information extraction (2001) 0.01 
    0.0050599845 = product of:
  0.010119969 = sum of:
    0.010119969 = product of:
      0.030359907 = sum of:
        0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 6029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030359907 = score(doc=6029,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 6029, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6029)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:02:50
  4. Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.; SanJuan, E.: From term variants to research topics (2002) 0.01 
    0.0050599845 = product of:
  0.010119969 = sum of:
    0.010119969 = product of:
      0.030359907 = sum of:
        0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 1853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030359907 = score(doc=1853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1853)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.181-197
  5. Rosemblat, G.; Tse, T.; Gemoets, D.: Adapting a monolingual consumer health system for Spanish cross-language information retrieval (2004) 0.01 
    0.0050599845 = product of:
  0.010119969 = sum of:
    0.010119969 = product of:
      0.030359907 = sum of:
        0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030359907 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 19:12:06
  6. Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic thesaurus generation for Chinese documents (2002) 0.01 
    0.0050599845 = product of:
  0.010119969 = sum of:
    0.010119969 = product of:
      0.030359907 = sum of:
        0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030359907 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Tseng constructs a word co-occurrence based thesaurus by means of the automatic analysis of Chinese text. Words are identified by a longest dictionary match supplemented by a key word extraction algorithm that merges back nearby tokens and accepts shorter strings of characters if they occur more often than the longest string. Single character auxiliary words are a major source of error but this can be greatly reduced with the use of a 70-character 2680 word stop list. Extracted terms with their associate document weights are sorted by decreasing frequency and the top of this list is associated using a Dice coefficient modified to account for longer documents on the weights of term pairs. Co-occurrence is not in the document as a whole but in paragraph or sentence size sections in order to reduce computation time. A window of 29 characters or 11 words was found to be sufficient. A thesaurus was produced from 25,230 Chinese news articles and judges asked to review the top 50 terms associated with each of 30 single word query terms. They determined 69% to be relevant.
  7. Gill, A.J.; Hinrichs-Krapels, S.; Blanke, T.; Grant, J.; Hedges, M.; Tanner, S.: Insight workflow : systematically combining human and computational methods to explore textual data (2017) 0.01 
    0.0050599845 = product of:
  0.010119969 = sum of:
    0.010119969 = product of:
      0.030359907 = sum of:
        0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 3682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030359907 = score(doc=3682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3682)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.11.2017 14:00:29
  8. Pepper, S.; Arnaud, P.J.L.: Absolutely PHAB : toward a general model of associative relations (2020) 0.01 
    0.0050599845 = product of:
  0.010119969 = sum of:
    0.010119969 = product of:
      0.030359907 = sum of:
        0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030359907 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    There have been many attempts at classifying the semantic modification relations (R) of N + N compounds but this work has not led to the acceptance of a definitive scheme, so that devising a reusable classification is a worthwhile aim. The scope of this undertaking is extended to other binominal lexemes, i.e. units that contain two thing-morphemes without explicitly stating R, like prepositional units, N + relational adjective units, etc. The 25-relation taxonomy of Bourque (2014) was tested against over 15,000 binominal lexemes from 106 languages and extended to a 29-relation scheme ("Bourque2") through the introduction of two new reversible relations. Bourque2 is then mapped onto Hatcher's (1960) four-relation scheme (extended by the addition of a fifth relation, similarity , as "Hatcher2"). This results in a two-tier system usable at different degrees of granularities. On account of its semantic proximity to compounding, metonymy is then taken into account, following Janda's (2011) suggestion that it plays a role in word formation; Peirsman and Geeraerts' (2006) inventory of 23 metonymic patterns is mapped onto Bourque2, confirming the identity of metonymic and binominal modification relations. Finally, Blank's (2003) and Koch's (2001) work on lexical semantics justifies the addition to the scheme of a third, superordinate level which comprises the three Aristotelean principles of similarity, contiguity and contrast.
  9. Laparra, E.; Binford-Walsh, A.; Emerson, K.; Miller, M.L.; López-Hoffman, L.; Currim, F.; Bethard, S.: Addressing structural hurdles for metadata extraction from environmental impact statements (2023) 0.01 
    0.0050599845 = product of:
  0.010119969 = sum of:
    0.010119969 = product of:
      0.030359907 = sum of:
        0.030359907 = weight(_text_:29 in 1042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030359907 = score(doc=1042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1042)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 8.2023 19:21:01
  10. Computational linguistics for the new millennium : divergence or synergy? Proceedings of the International Symposium held at the Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, 21-22 July 2000. Festschrift in honour of Peter Hellwig on the occasion of his 60th birthday (2002) 0.01 
    0.005014467 = product of:
  0.010028934 = sum of:
    0.010028934 = product of:
      0.0300868 = sum of:
        0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0300868 = score(doc=4900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Fóris, A.: Network theory and terminology (2013) 0.01 
    0.005014467 = product of:
  0.010028934 = sum of:
    0.010028934 = product of:
      0.0300868 = sum of:
        0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0300868 = score(doc=1365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 9.2014 21:22:48
  12. Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023) 0.01 
    0.005014467 = product of:
  0.010028934 = sum of:
    0.010028934 = product of:
      0.0300868 = sum of:
        0.0300868 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0300868 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:07:22
  13. Jones, I.; Cunliffe, D.; Tudhope, D.: Natural language processing and knowledge organization systems as an aid to retrieval (2004) 0.01 
    0.005009129 = product of:
  0.010018258 = sum of:
    0.010018258 = product of:
      0.030054774 = sum of:
        0.030054774 = weight(_text_:29 in 2677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030054774 = score(doc=2677,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.19237353 = fieldWeight in 2677, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2677)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 19:29:56
  14. Vlachidis, A.; Binding, C.; Tudhope, D.; May, K.: Excavating grey literature : a case study on the rich indexing of archaeological documents via natural language-processing techniques and knowledge-based resources (2010) 0.00 
    0.0040479875 = product of:
  0.008095975 = sum of:
    0.008095975 = product of:
      0.024287924 = sum of:
        0.024287924 = weight(_text_:29 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024287924 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15623134 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:03:40
  15. Yang, C.C.; Luk, J.: Automatic generation of English/Chinese thesaurus based on a parallel corpus in laws (2003) 0.00 
    0.0035101266 = product of:
  0.007020253 = sum of:
    0.007020253 = product of:
      0.02106076 = sum of:
        0.02106076 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02106076 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.
  16. Deventer, J.P. van; Kruger, C.J.; Johnson, R.D.: Delineating knowledge management through lexical analysis : a retrospective (2015) 0.00 
    0.0035101266 = product of:
  0.007020253 = sum of:
    0.007020253 = product of:
      0.02106076 = sum of:
        0.02106076 = weight(_text_:22 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02106076 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15552706 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044413086 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 65
  • el 6
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • p 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications