Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Data Mining"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Short, M.: Text mining and subject analysis for fiction; or, using machine learning and information extraction to assign subject headings to dime novels (2019) 0.08
    0.084560595 = product of:
      0.16912119 = sum of:
        0.010483121 = weight(_text_:information in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010483121 = score(doc=5481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
        0.10706388 = weight(_text_:united in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10706388 = score(doc=5481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.433885 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
        0.05157419 = product of:
          0.10314838 = sum of:
            0.10314838 = weight(_text_:states in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10314838 = score(doc=5481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes multiple experiments in text mining at Northern Illinois University that were undertaken to improve the efficiency and accuracy of cataloging. It focuses narrowly on subject analysis of dime novels, a format of inexpensive fiction that was popular in the United States between 1860 and 1915. NIU holds more than 55,000 dime novels in its collections, which it is in the process of comprehensively digitizing. Classification, keyword extraction, named-entity recognition, clustering, and topic modeling are discussed as means of assigning subject headings to improve their discoverability by researchers and to increase the productivity of digitization workflows.
  2. Mining text data (2012) 0.03
    0.03181587 = product of:
      0.095447615 = sum of:
        0.008471641 = weight(_text_:information in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008471641 = score(doc=362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
        0.08697598 = weight(_text_:networks in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08697598 = score(doc=362,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.4180698 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Text mining applications have experienced tremendous advances because of web 2.0 and social networking applications. Recent advances in hardware and software technology have lead to a number of unique scenarios where text mining algorithms are learned. Mining Text Data introduces an important niche in the text analytics field, and is an edited volume contributed by leading international researchers and practitioners focused on social networks & data mining. This book contains a wide swath in topics across social networks & data mining. Each chapter contains a comprehensive survey including the key research content on the topic, and the future directions of research in the field. There is a special focus on Text Embedded with Heterogeneous and Multimedia Data which makes the mining process much more challenging. A number of methods have been designed such as transfer learning and cross-lingual mining for such cases. Mining Text Data simplifies the content, so that advanced-level students, practitioners and researchers in computer science can benefit from this book. Academic and corporate libraries, as well as ACM, IEEE, and Management Science focused on information security, electronic commerce, databases, data mining, machine learning, and statistics are the primary buyers for this reference book.
    Content
    Inhalt: An Introduction to Text Mining.- Information Extraction from Text.- A Survey of Text Summarization Techniques.- A Survey of Text Clustering Algorithms.- Dimensionality Reduction and Topic Modeling.- A Survey of Text Classification Algorithms.- Transfer Learning for Text Mining.- Probabilistic Models for Text Mining.- Mining Text Streams.- Translingual Mining from Text Data.- Text Mining in Multimedia.- Text Analytics in Social Media.- A Survey of Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis.- Biomedical Text Mining: A Survey of Recent Progress.- Index.
    LCSH
    Computer Communication Networks
    Subject
    Computer Communication Networks
  3. Leydesdorff, L.; Persson, O.: Mapping the geography of science : distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes (2010) 0.03
    0.025979813 = product of:
      0.077939436 = sum of:
        0.012707461 = weight(_text_:information in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012707461 = score(doc=3704,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
        0.06523198 = weight(_text_:networks in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06523198 = score(doc=3704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Using Google Earth, Google Maps, and/or network visualization programs such as Pajek, one can overlay the network of relations among addresses in scientific publications onto the geographic map. The authors discuss the pros and cons of various options, and provide software (freeware) for bridging existing gaps between the Science Citation Indices (Thomson Reuters) and Scopus (Elsevier), on the one hand, and these various visualization tools on the other. At the level of city names, the global map can be drawn reliably on the basis of the available address information. At the level of the names of organizations and institutes, there are problems of unification both in the ISI databases and with Scopus. Pajek enables a combination of visualization and statistical analysis, whereas the Google Maps and its derivatives provide superior tools on the Internet.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.8, S.1622-1634
  4. Berendt, B.; Krause, B.; Kolbe-Nusser, S.: Intelligent scientific authoring tools : interactive data mining for constructive uses of citation networks (2010) 0.02
    0.024739172 = product of:
      0.07421751 = sum of:
        0.0089855315 = weight(_text_:information in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0089855315 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
        0.06523198 = weight(_text_:networks in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06523198 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.1-10
  5. Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015) 0.01
    0.008495895 = product of:
      0.025487684 = sum of:
        0.01058955 = weight(_text_:information in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058955 = score(doc=1605,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
        0.0148981325 = product of:
          0.029796265 = sum of:
            0.029796265 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029796265 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Numerous studies have explored the possibility of uncovering information from web search queries but few have examined the factors that affect web query data sources. We conducted a study that investigated this issue by comparing Google Trends and Baidu Index. Data from these two services are based on queries entered by users into Google and Baidu, two of the largest search engines in the world. We first compared the features and functions of the two services based on documents and extensive testing. We then carried out an empirical study that collected query volume data from the two sources. We found that data from both sources could be used to predict the quality of Chinese universities and companies. Despite the differences between the two services in terms of technology, such as differing methods of language processing, the search volume data from the two were highly correlated and combining the two data sources did not improve the predictive power of the data. However, there was a major difference between the two in terms of data availability. Baidu Index was able to provide more search volume data than Google Trends did. Our analysis showed that the disadvantage of Google Trends in this regard was due to Google's smaller user base in China. The implication of this finding goes beyond China. Google's user bases in many countries are smaller than that in China, so the search volume data related to those countries could result in the same issue as that related to China.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22
  6. Hallonsten, O.; Holmberg, D.: Analyzing structural stratification in the Swedish higher education system : data contextualization with policy-history analysis (2013) 0.01
    0.0074620256 = product of:
      0.022386076 = sum of:
        0.007487943 = weight(_text_:information in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007487943 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
        0.0148981325 = product of:
          0.029796265 = sum of:
            0.029796265 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029796265 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:43:01
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.574-586
  7. Fonseca, F.; Marcinkowski, M.; Davis, C.: Cyber-human systems of thought and understanding (2019) 0.01
    0.0074620256 = product of:
      0.022386076 = sum of:
        0.007487943 = weight(_text_:information in 5011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007487943 = score(doc=5011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5011)
        0.0148981325 = product of:
          0.029796265 = sum of:
            0.029796265 = weight(_text_:22 in 5011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029796265 = score(doc=5011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043984205 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5011)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    7. 3.2019 16:32:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.4, S.402-411
  8. Huvila, I.: Mining qualitative data on human information behaviour from the Web (2010) 0.00
    0.0034943735 = product of:
      0.020966241 = sum of:
        0.020966241 = weight(_text_:information in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020966241 = score(doc=4676,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses an approach of collecting qualitative data on human information behaviour that is based on mining web data using search engines. The approach is technically the same that has been used for some time in webometric research to make statistical inferences on web data, but the present paper shows how the same tools and data collecting methods can be used to gather data for qualitative data analysis on human information behaviour.
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  9. Blake, C.: Text mining (2011) 0.00
    0.0034943735 = product of:
      0.020966241 = sum of:
        0.020966241 = weight(_text_:information in 1599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020966241 = score(doc=1599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1599)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.121-155
  10. O'Brien, H.L.; Lebow, M.: Mixed-methods approach to measuring user experience in online news interactions (2013) 0.00
    0.0030569402 = product of:
      0.01834164 = sum of:
        0.01834164 = weight(_text_:information in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01834164 = score(doc=1001,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    When it comes to evaluating online information experiences, what metrics matter? We conducted a study in which 30 people browsed and selected content within an online news website. Data collected included psychometric scales (User Engagement, Cognitive Absorption, System Usability Scales), self-reported interest in news content, and performance metrics (i.e., reading time, browsing time, total time, number of pages visited, and use of recommended links); a subset of the participants had their physiological responses recorded during the interaction (i.e., heart rate, electrodermal activity, electrocmytogram). Findings demonstrated the concurrent validity of the psychometric scales and interest ratings and revealed that increased time on tasks, number of pages visited, and use of recommended links were not necessarily indicative of greater self-reported engagement, cognitive absorption, or perceived usability. Positive ratings of news content were associated with lower physiological activity. The implications of this research are twofold. First, we propose that user experience is a useful framework for studying online information interactions and will result in a broader conceptualization of information interaction and its evaluation. Second, we advocate a mixed-methods approach to measurement that employs a suite of metrics capable of capturing the pragmatic (e.g., usability) and hedonic (e.g., fun, engagement) aspects of information interactions. We underscore the importance of using multiple measures in information research, because our results emphasize that performance and physiological data must be interpreted in the context of users' subjective experiences.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1543-1556
  11. Chardonnens, A.; Hengchen, S.: Text mining for cultural heritage institutions : a 5-step method for cultural heritage institutions (2017) 0.00
    0.0028238804 = product of:
      0.016943282 = sum of:
        0.016943282 = weight(_text_:information in 646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016943282 = score(doc=646,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 646, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=646)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Everything changes, everything stays the same? - Understanding information spaces : Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science (ISI 2017), Berlin/Germany, 13th - 15th March 2017. Eds.: M. Gäde, V. Trkulja u. V. Petras
  12. Suakkaphong, N.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, H.: Disease named entity recognition using semisupervised learning and conditional random fields (2011) 0.00
    0.0027905914 = product of:
      0.016743548 = sum of:
        0.016743548 = weight(_text_:information in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016743548 = score(doc=4367,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Information extraction is an important text-mining task that aims at extracting prespecified types of information from large text collections and making them available in structured representations such as databases. In the biomedical domain, information extraction can be applied to help biologists make the most use of their digital-literature archives. Currently, there are large amounts of biomedical literature that contain rich information about biomedical substances. Extracting such knowledge requires a good named entity recognition technique. In this article, we combine conditional random fields (CRFs), a state-of-the-art sequence-labeling algorithm, with two semisupervised learning techniques, bootstrapping and feature sampling, to recognize disease names from biomedical literature. Two data-processing strategies for each technique also were analyzed: one sequentially processing unlabeled data partitions and another one processing unlabeled data partitions in a round-robin fashion. The experimental results showed the advantage of semisupervised learning techniques given limited labeled training data. Specifically, CRFs with bootstrapping implemented in sequential fashion outperformed strictly supervised CRFs for disease name recognition. The project was supported by NIH/NLM Grant R33 LM07299-01, 2002-2005.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.4, S.727-737
  13. Biskri, I.; Rompré, L.: Using association rules for query reformulation (2012) 0.00
    0.0025938996 = product of:
      0.015563398 = sum of:
        0.015563398 = weight(_text_:information in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015563398 = score(doc=92,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper the authors will present research on the combination of two methods of data mining: text classification and maximal association rules. Text classification has been the focus of interest of many researchers for a long time. However, the results take the form of lists of words (classes) that people often do not know what to do with. The use of maximal association rules induced a number of advantages: (1) the detection of dependencies and correlations between the relevant units of information (words) of different classes, (2) the extraction of hidden knowledge, often relevant, from a large volume of data. The authors will show how this combination can improve the process of information retrieval.
    Source
    Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
  14. Sarnikar, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, J.L.: Query-performance prediction for effective query routing in domain-specific repositories (2014) 0.00
    0.0025938996 = product of:
      0.015563398 = sum of:
        0.015563398 = weight(_text_:information in 1326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015563398 = score(doc=1326,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 1326, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1326)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The effective use of corporate memory is becoming increasingly important because every aspect of e-business requires access to information repositories. Unfortunately, less-than-satisfying effectiveness in state-of-the-art information-retrieval techniques is well known, even for some of the best search engines such as Google. In this study, the authors resolve this retrieval ineffectiveness problem by developing a new framework for predicting query performance, which is the first step toward better retrieval effectiveness. Specifically, they examine the relationship between query performance and query context. A query context consists of the query itself, the document collection, and the interaction between the two. The authors first analyze the characteristics of query context and develop various features for predicting query performance. Then, they propose a context-sensitive model for predicting query performance based on the characteristics of the query and the document collection. Finally, they validate this model with respect to five real-world collections of documents and demonstrate its utility in routing queries to the correct repository with high accuracy.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.8, S.1597-1614
  15. Wei, C.-P.; Lee, Y.-H.; Chiang, Y.-S.; Chen, C.-T.; Yang, C.C.C.: Exploiting temporal characteristics of features for effectively discovering event episodes from news corpora (2014) 0.00
    0.002495981 = product of:
      0.014975886 = sum of:
        0.014975886 = weight(_text_:information in 1225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014975886 = score(doc=1225,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1225, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1225)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    An organization performing environmental scanning generally monitors or tracks various events concerning its external environment. One of the major resources for environmental scanning is online news documents, which are readily accessible on news websites or infomediaries. However, the proliferation of the World Wide Web, which increases information sources and improves information circulation, has vastly expanded the amount of information to be scanned. Thus, it is essential to develop an effective event episode discovery mechanism to organize news documents pertaining to an event of interest. In this study, we propose two new metrics, Term Frequency × Inverse Document FrequencyTempo (TF×IDFTempo) and TF×Enhanced-IDFTempo, and develop a temporal-based event episode discovery (TEED) technique that uses the proposed metrics for feature selection and document representation. Using a traditional TF×IDF-based hierarchical agglomerative clustering technique as a performance benchmark, our empirical evaluation reveals that the proposed TEED technique outperforms its benchmark, as measured by cluster recall and cluster precision. In addition, the use of TF×Enhanced-IDFTempo significantly improves the effectiveness of event episode discovery when compared with the use of TF×IDFTempo.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.621-634
  16. Zhang, Z.; Li, Q.; Zeng, D.; Ga, H.: Extracting evolutionary communities in community question answering (2014) 0.00
    0.0021615832 = product of:
      0.0129694985 = sum of:
        0.0129694985 = weight(_text_:information in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0129694985 = score(doc=1286,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapid growth of Web 2.0, community question answering (CQA) has become a prevalent information seeking channel, in which users form interactive communities by posting questions and providing answers. Communities may evolve over time, because of changes in users' interests, activities, and new users joining the network. To better understand user interactions in CQA communities, it is necessary to analyze the community structures and track community evolution over time. Existing work in CQA focuses on question searching or content quality detection, and the important problems of community extraction and evolutionary pattern detection have not been studied. In this article, we propose a probabilistic community model (PCM) to extract overlapping community structures and capture their evolution patterns in CQA. The empirical results show that our algorithm appears to improve the community extraction quality. We show empirically, using the iPhone data set, that interesting community evolution patterns can be discovered, with each evolution pattern reflecting the variation of users' interests over time. Our analysis suggests that individual users could benefit to gain comprehensive information from tracking the transition of products. We also show that the communities provide a decision-making basis for business.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.6, S.1170-1186
  17. Varathan, K.D.; Giachanou, A.; Crestani, F.: Comparative opinion mining : a review (2017) 0.00
    0.0021615832 = product of:
      0.0129694985 = sum of:
        0.0129694985 = weight(_text_:information in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0129694985 = score(doc=3540,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Opinion mining refers to the use of natural language processing, text analysis, and computational linguistics to identify and extract subjective information in textual material. Opinion mining, also known as sentiment analysis, has received a lot of attention in recent times, as it provides a number of tools to analyze public opinion on a number of different topics. Comparative opinion mining is a subfield of opinion mining which deals with identifying and extracting information that is expressed in a comparative form (e.g., "paper X is better than the Y"). Comparative opinion mining plays a very important role when one tries to evaluate something because it provides a reference point for the comparison. This paper provides a review of the area of comparative opinion mining. It is the first review that cover specifically this topic as all previous reviews dealt mostly with general opinion mining. This survey covers comparative opinion mining from two different angles. One from the perspective of techniques and the other from the perspective of comparative opinion elements. It also incorporates preprocessing tools as well as data set that were used by past researchers that can be useful to future researchers in the field of comparative opinion mining.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.811-829
  18. Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Janssens, F.; Glänzel, W.; Moreau, Y.; Moor, B.de: Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database (2010) 0.00
    0.0021179102 = product of:
      0.012707461 = sum of:
        0.012707461 = weight(_text_:information in 3464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012707461 = score(doc=3464,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3464, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3464)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    We propose a new hybrid clustering framework to incorporate text mining with bibliometrics in journal set analysis. The framework integrates two different approaches: clustering ensemble and kernel-fusion clustering. To improve the flexibility and the efficiency of processing large-scale data, we propose an information-based weighting scheme to leverage the effect of multiple data sources in hybrid clustering. Three different algorithms are extended by the proposed weighting scheme and they are employed on a large journal set retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database. The clustering performance of the proposed algorithms is systematically evaluated using multiple evaluation methods, and they were cross-compared with alternative methods. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed weighted hybrid clustering strategy is superior to other methods in clustering performance and efficiency. The proposed approach also provides a more refined structural mapping of journal sets, which is useful for monitoring and detecting new trends in different scientific fields.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1105-1119
  19. Berry, M.W.; Esau, R.; Kiefer, B.: ¬The use of text mining techniques in electronic discovery for legal matters (2012) 0.00
    0.0021179102 = product of:
      0.012707461 = sum of:
        0.012707461 = weight(_text_:information in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012707461 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic discovery (eDiscovery) is the process of collecting and analyzing electronic documents to determine their relevance to a legal matter. Office technology has advanced and eased the requirements necessary to create a document. As such, the volume of data has outgrown the manual processes previously used to make relevance judgments. Methods of text mining and information retrieval have been put to use in eDiscovery to help tame the volume of data; however, the results have been uneven. This chapter looks at the historical bias of the collection process. The authors examine how tools like classifiers, latent semantic analysis, and non-negative matrix factorization deal with nuances of the collection process.
    Source
    Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
  20. Sun, X.; Lin, H.: Topical community detection from mining user tagging behavior and interest (2013) 0.00
    0.0021179102 = product of:
      0.012707461 = sum of:
        0.012707461 = weight(_text_:information in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012707461 = score(doc=605,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043984205 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    With the development of Web2.0, social tagging systems in which users can freely choose tags to annotate resources according to their interests have attracted much attention. In particular, literature on the emergence of collective intelligence in social tagging systems has increased. In this article, we propose a probabilistic generative model to detect latent topical communities among users. Social tags and resource contents are leveraged to model user interest in two similar and correlated ways. Our primary goal is to capture user tagging behavior and interest and discover the emergent topical community structure. The communities should be groups of users with frequent social interactions as well as similar topical interests, which would have important research implications for personalized information services. Experimental results on two real social tagging data sets with different genres have shown that the proposed generative model more accurately models user interest and detects high-quality and meaningful topical communities.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.321-333

Types

  • a 39
  • m 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…