Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Data Mining"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Miao, Q.; Li, Q.; Zeng, D.: Fine-grained opinion mining by integrating multiple review sources (2010) 0.03
    0.032873254 = product of:
      0.06574651 = sum of:
        0.06574651 = product of:
          0.13149302 = sum of:
            0.13149302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13149302 = score(doc=4104,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 4104, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4104)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapid development of Web 2.0, online reviews have become extremely valuable sources for mining customers' opinions. Fine-grained opinion mining has attracted more and more attention of both applied and theoretical research. In this article, the authors study how to automatically mine product features and opinions from multiple review sources. Specifically, they propose an integration strategy to solve the issue. Within the integration strategy, the authors mine domain knowledge from semistructured reviews and then exploit the domain knowledge to assist product feature extraction and sentiment orientation identification from unstructured reviews. Finally, feature-opinion tuples are generated. Experimental results on real-world datasets show that the proposed approach is effective.
  2. Zhang, Z.; Li, Q.; Zeng, D.; Ga, H.: Extracting evolutionary communities in community question answering (2014) 0.02
    0.023480896 = product of:
      0.04696179 = sum of:
        0.04696179 = product of:
          0.09392358 = sum of:
            0.09392358 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09392358 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.320393 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapid growth of Web 2.0, community question answering (CQA) has become a prevalent information seeking channel, in which users form interactive communities by posting questions and providing answers. Communities may evolve over time, because of changes in users' interests, activities, and new users joining the network. To better understand user interactions in CQA communities, it is necessary to analyze the community structures and track community evolution over time. Existing work in CQA focuses on question searching or content quality detection, and the important problems of community extraction and evolutionary pattern detection have not been studied. In this article, we propose a probabilistic community model (PCM) to extract overlapping community structures and capture their evolution patterns in CQA. The empirical results show that our algorithm appears to improve the community extraction quality. We show empirically, using the iPhone data set, that interesting community evolution patterns can be discovered, with each evolution pattern reflecting the variation of users' interests over time. Our analysis suggests that individual users could benefit to gain comprehensive information from tracking the transition of products. We also show that the communities provide a decision-making basis for business.
  3. Mining text data (2012) 0.02
    0.018784717 = product of:
      0.037569433 = sum of:
        0.037569433 = product of:
          0.07513887 = sum of:
            0.07513887 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07513887 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Text mining applications have experienced tremendous advances because of web 2.0 and social networking applications. Recent advances in hardware and software technology have lead to a number of unique scenarios where text mining algorithms are learned. Mining Text Data introduces an important niche in the text analytics field, and is an edited volume contributed by leading international researchers and practitioners focused on social networks & data mining. This book contains a wide swath in topics across social networks & data mining. Each chapter contains a comprehensive survey including the key research content on the topic, and the future directions of research in the field. There is a special focus on Text Embedded with Heterogeneous and Multimedia Data which makes the mining process much more challenging. A number of methods have been designed such as transfer learning and cross-lingual mining for such cases. Mining Text Data simplifies the content, so that advanced-level students, practitioners and researchers in computer science can benefit from this book. Academic and corporate libraries, as well as ACM, IEEE, and Management Science focused on information security, electronic commerce, databases, data mining, machine learning, and statistics are the primary buyers for this reference book.
  4. Hallonsten, O.; Holmberg, D.: Analyzing structural stratification in the Swedish higher education system : data contextualization with policy-history analysis (2013) 0.01
    0.008560294 = product of:
      0.017120589 = sum of:
        0.017120589 = product of:
          0.034241177 = sum of:
            0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034241177 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:43:01
  5. Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015) 0.01
    0.008560294 = product of:
      0.017120589 = sum of:
        0.017120589 = product of:
          0.034241177 = sum of:
            0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034241177 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22
  6. Fonseca, F.; Marcinkowski, M.; Davis, C.: Cyber-human systems of thought and understanding (2019) 0.01
    0.008560294 = product of:
      0.017120589 = sum of:
        0.017120589 = product of:
          0.034241177 = sum of:
            0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 5011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034241177 = score(doc=5011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5011)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 3.2019 16:32:22