Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.06 
    0.062205013 = product of:
  0.15551253 = sum of:
    0.09896252 = weight(_text_:21 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09896252 = score(doc=132,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.61228216 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.04 
    0.040322956 = product of:
  0.10080738 = sum of:
    0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04425738 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.056550004 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056550004 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:21:29
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  3. Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004) 0.04 
    0.03996181 = product of:
  0.09990452 = sum of:
    0.057492025 = weight(_text_:21 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057492025 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.35570377 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02 
    0.015994756 = product of:
  0.07997378 = sum of:
    0.07997378 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07997378 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  5. Madison, O.M.A.: Standards in light of new technologies : functional requirements for bibliographic records (1999) 0.02 
    0.015490084 = product of:
  0.07745042 = sum of:
    0.07745042 = weight(_text_:21 in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07745042 = score(doc=4182,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.47918653 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
  6. Boruah, B.B.; Ravikumar, S.; Gayang, F.L.: Consistency, extent, and validation of the utilization of the MARC 21 bibliographic standard in the college libraries of Assam in India (2023) 0.01 
    0.013414807 = product of:
  0.06707403 = sum of:
    0.06707403 = weight(_text_:21 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06707403 = score(doc=1183,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.41498774 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper brings light to the existing practice of cataloging in the college libraries of Assam in terms of utilizing the MARC 21 standard and its structure, i.e., the tags, subfield codes, and indicators. Catalog records from six college libraries are collected and a survey is conducted to understand the local users' information requirements for the catalog. Places, where libraries have scope to improve and which divisions of tags could be more helpful for them in information retrieval, are identified and suggested. This study fulfilled the need for local-level assessment of the catalogs.
    Object
    MARC 21
  7. Nichols introduces MARCit (1998) 0.01 
    0.013277213 = product of:
  0.06638607 = sum of:
    0.06638607 = weight(_text_:21 in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06638607 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.41073132 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    5. 9.1996 21:13:24
  8. Kushwoh, S.S.; Gautam, J.N.; Singh, R.: Migration from CDS / ISIS to KOHA : a case study of data conversion from CCF to MARC 21 (2009) 0.01 
    0.013277213 = product of:
  0.06638607 = sum of:
    0.06638607 = weight(_text_:21 in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06638607 = score(doc=2279,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.41073132 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Standards are important for quality and interoperability in any system. Bibliographic record creation standards such as MARC 21 (Machine Readable Catalogue), CCF (Common Communication Format), UNIMARC (Universal MARC) and their local variations, are in practice all across the library community. ILMS (Integrated Library Management Systems) are using these standards for the design of databases and the creation of bibliographic records. Their use is important for uniformity of the system and bibliographic data, but there are problems when a library wants to switch over from one system to another using different standards. This paper discusses migration from one record standard to another, mapping of data and related issues. Data exported from CDS/ISIS CCF based records to KOHA MARC 21 based records are discussed as a case study. This methodology, with few modifications, can be applied for migration of data in other bibliographicformats too. Freeware tools can be utilized for migration.
    Object
    MARC 21
  9. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.01 
    0.00989625 = product of:
  0.04948125 = sum of:
    0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04948125 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  10. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.01 
    0.00989625 = product of:
  0.04948125 = sum of:
    0.04948125 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04948125 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  11. Kartus, E.: Beyond MARC : is it really possible? (1995) 0.01 
    0.008851476 = product of:
  0.04425738 = sum of:
    0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 5753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04425738 = score(doc=5753,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 5753, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5753)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 21(1995) nos.3/4, S.144-156
  12. Tillett, B.: Cataloguing rules and conceptual models for the electronic environment (1995) 0.01 
    0.008851476 = product of:
  0.04425738 = sum of:
    0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04425738 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 21(1995) nos.3/4, S.67-103
  13. Hopkins, J.: USMARC as metadata shell (1999) 0.01 
    0.008851476 = product of:
  0.04425738 = sum of:
    0.04425738 = weight(_text_:21 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04425738 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 3.1998 13:17:50
  14. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.01 
    0.0084825 = product of:
  0.0424125 = sum of:
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Leazer, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographic relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog : an examination of serials (1996) 0.01 
    0.007745042 = product of:
  0.03872521 = sum of:
    0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03872521 = score(doc=5579,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.205-220
  16. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.01 
    0.0070687504 = product of:
  0.03534375 = sum of:
    0.03534375 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03534375 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994) 0.01 
    0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 17
  • b 1

Themes