Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01
    0.007921926 = product of:
      0.03960963 = sum of:
        0.0256744 = weight(_text_:web in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0256744 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
        0.013935229 = product of:
          0.041805685 = sum of:
            0.041805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041805685 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  2. Xu, A.; Hess, K.; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks (2018) 0.00
    0.002269318 = product of:
      0.02269318 = sum of:
        0.02269318 = weight(_text_:web in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02269318 = score(doc=5172,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
  3. Miller, E.; Ogbuji, U.: Linked data design for the visible library (2015) 0.00
    0.0019255801 = product of:
      0.0192558 = sum of:
        0.0192558 = weight(_text_:web in 2773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0192558 = score(doc=2773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2773)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    In response to libraries' frustration over their rich resources being invisible on the web, Zepheira, at the request of the Library of Congress, created BIBFRAME, a bibliographic metadata framework for cataloging. The model replaces MARC records with linked data, promoting resource visibility through a rich network of links. In place of formal taxonomies, a small but extensible vocabulary streamlines metadata efforts. Rather than using a unique bibliographic record to describe one item, BIBFRAME draws on the Dublin Core and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) to generate formalized descriptions of Work, Instance, Authority and Annotation as well as associations between items. Zepheira trains librarians to transform MARC records to BIBFRAME resources and adapt the vocabulary for specialized needs, while subject matter experts and technical experts manage content, site design and usability. With a different approach toward data modeling and metadata, previously invisible resources gain visibility through linking.
  4. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.00
    9.853694E-4 = product of:
      0.009853695 = sum of:
        0.009853695 = product of:
          0.029561082 = sum of:
            0.029561082 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029561082 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.00
    9.853694E-4 = product of:
      0.009853695 = sum of:
        0.009853695 = product of:
          0.029561082 = sum of:
            0.029561082 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029561082 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  6. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.00
    8.6219824E-4 = product of:
      0.008621982 = sum of:
        0.008621982 = product of:
          0.025865946 = sum of:
            0.025865946 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025865946 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  7. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.00
    8.6219824E-4 = product of:
      0.008621982 = sum of:
        0.008621982 = product of:
          0.025865946 = sum of:
            0.025865946 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025865946 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  8. Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004) 0.00
    7.39027E-4 = product of:
      0.00739027 = sum of:
        0.00739027 = product of:
          0.02217081 = sum of:
            0.02217081 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02217081 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.00
    7.39027E-4 = product of:
      0.00739027 = sum of:
        0.00739027 = product of:
          0.02217081 = sum of:
            0.02217081 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02217081 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.00
    6.1585585E-4 = product of:
      0.0061585587 = sum of:
        0.0061585587 = product of:
          0.018475676 = sum of:
            0.018475676 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018475676 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22