-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.13
0.1277046 = product of:
0.1915569 = sum of:
0.063876994 = weight(_text_:resources in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063876994 = score(doc=4748,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.12767991 = sum of:
0.08611246 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08611246 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.08
0.082906336 = product of:
0.1243595 = sum of:
0.08516933 = weight(_text_:resources in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08516933 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.45629224 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.03919017 = product of:
0.07838034 = sum of:
0.07838034 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07838034 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.06
0.058623634 = product of:
0.08793545 = sum of:
0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06022381 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.027711634 = product of:
0.055423267 = sum of:
0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055423267 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
-
METS: an overview & tutorial : Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard (METS) (2001)
0.05
0.048266005 = product of:
0.072399005 = sum of:
0.045167856 = weight(_text_:resources in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045167856 = score(doc=1323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2419855 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.027231153 = product of:
0.054462306 = sum of:
0.054462306 = weight(_text_:management in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054462306 = score(doc=1323,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Maintaining a library of digital objects of necessaryy requires maintaining metadata about those objects. The metadata necessary for successful management and use of digital objeets is both more extensive than and different from the metadata used for managing collections of printed works and other physical materials. While a library may record descriptive metadata regarding a book in its collection, the book will not dissolve into a series of unconnected pages if the library fails to record structural metadata regarding the book's organization, nor will scholars be unable to evaluate the book's worth if the library fails to note that the book was produced using a Ryobi offset press. The Same cannot be said for a digital version of the saure book. Without structural metadata, the page image or text files comprising the digital work are of little use, and without technical metadata regarding the digitization process, scholars may be unsure of how accurate a reflection of the original the digital version provides. For internal management purposes, a library must have access to appropriate technical metadata in order to periodically refresh and migrate the data, ensuring the durability of valuable resources.
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.04
0.036639772 = product of:
0.054959655 = sum of:
0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037639882 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.017319772 = product of:
0.034639545 = sum of:
0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034639545 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 47(2003) no.2, S.71-76
-
Guenther, R.; McCallum, S.: New metadata standards for digital resources : MODS and METS (2003)
0.04
0.035130557 = product of:
0.10539167 = sum of:
0.10539167 = weight(_text_:resources in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10539167 = score(doc=1250,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.56463283 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata has taken an a new took with the advent of XML and digital resources. XML provides a new versatile structure for tagging and packaging metadata as the rapid proliferation of digital resources demands both rapidly produced descriptive data and the encoding of more types of metadata. Two emerging standards are attempting to harness these developments for library needs. The first is the Metadata Object and Description Schema (MODS), a MARC-compatible XML schema for encoding descriptive data. The second standard is the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS), a highly flexible XML schema for packaging the descriptive metadata and various other important types of metadata needed to assure the use and preservation of digital resources.
-
Nichols introduces MARCit (1998)
0.03
0.030111905 = product of:
0.09033571 = sum of:
0.09033571 = weight(_text_:resources in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09033571 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.483971 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports the release of MARCit, a software package that enables the cataloguing of Internet resources into MARC format bibliographic records
-
Hopkins, J.: USMARC as metadata shell (1999)
0.02
0.020074604 = product of:
0.06022381 = sum of:
0.06022381 = weight(_text_:resources in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06022381 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper introduces the two concepts of Content and Coding which together define Metadata. The encoding scheme used to hold the data content is referred to as a shell. One such shell is the MARC format. In this paper I describe the MARC format and its application to Internet resources, primarily through the OCLC-sponsored Intercat Project
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.018474422 = product of:
0.055423267 = sum of:
0.055423267 = product of:
0.110846534 = sum of:
0.110846534 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110846534 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Cranefield, S.: Networked knowledge representation and exchange using UML and RDF (2001)
0.02
0.017565278 = product of:
0.052695833 = sum of:
0.052695833 = weight(_text_:resources in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052695833 = score(doc=5896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.28231642 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.01616512 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = product of:
0.09699072 = sum of:
0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09699072 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.01616512 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = product of:
0.09699072 = sum of:
0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09699072 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.01306339 = product of:
0.03919017 = sum of:
0.03919017 = product of:
0.07838034 = sum of:
0.07838034 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07838034 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.009237211 = product of:
0.027711634 = sum of:
0.027711634 = product of:
0.055423267 = sum of:
0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055423267 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.01
0.009237211 = product of:
0.027711634 = sum of:
0.027711634 = product of:
0.055423267 = sum of:
0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055423267 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.009237211 = product of:
0.027711634 = sum of:
0.027711634 = product of:
0.055423267 = sum of:
0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055423267 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.01
0.00808256 = product of:
0.02424768 = sum of:
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.01
0.00808256 = product of:
0.02424768 = sum of:
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004)
0.01
0.00808256 = product of:
0.02424768 = sum of:
0.02424768 = product of:
0.04849536 = sum of:
0.04849536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04849536 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
-
Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004)
0.01
0.0069279084 = product of:
0.020783724 = sum of:
0.020783724 = product of:
0.04156745 = sum of:
0.04156745 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04156745 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051133685 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
