Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.07
    0.071355976 = product of:
      0.17838994 = sum of:
        0.13043496 = weight(_text_:views in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13043496 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.44666123 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
        0.047954973 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047954973 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  2. Spangen, I.C.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : Nordic and German reactions to the functional requirements study (1995) 0.04
    0.03726713 = product of:
      0.18633564 = sum of:
        0.18633564 = weight(_text_:views in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18633564 = score(doc=3083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.63808745 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents the German and Nordic reactions. Provides a background to the Northern European cataloguing tradition. Offers views from Denmark, Sweden and Norway
  3. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.02
    0.018633565 = product of:
      0.09316782 = sum of:
        0.09316782 = weight(_text_:views in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09316782 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2920221 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.31904373 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
  4. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.015501389 = product of:
      0.077506945 = sum of:
        0.077506945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077506945 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  5. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.015501389 = product of:
      0.077506945 = sum of:
        0.077506945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077506945 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  6. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01
    0.013563715 = product of:
      0.067818575 = sum of:
        0.067818575 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067818575 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  7. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
  8. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
  9. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  10. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  11. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  12. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  13. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  14. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
  15. Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
  16. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51
  18. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
  19. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.01
    0.010961137 = product of:
      0.054805685 = sum of:
        0.054805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054805685 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17706616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050563898 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174