Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"s"
  1. Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996) 0.02 
    0.016206207 = product of:
  0.06482483 = sum of:
    0.06482483 = weight(_text_:l in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06482483 = score(doc=57,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17396861 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043769516 = queryNorm
        0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
    Footnote
    Rez. in: RQ 36(1996) no.2, S.313-314 (L. Chase); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 27(1998) no.1, S.27 (C. Oliver)
  2. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.011860331 = product of:
  0.047441322 = sum of:
    0.047441322 = product of:
      0.094882645 = sum of:
        0.094882645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094882645 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043769516 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.010377789 = product of:
  0.041511156 = sum of:
    0.041511156 = product of:
      0.08302231 = sum of:
        0.08302231 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08302231 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043769516 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  4. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.010377789 = product of:
  0.041511156 = sum of:
    0.041511156 = product of:
      0.08302231 = sum of:
        0.08302231 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08302231 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043769516 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  5. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.01 
    0.0051888945 = product of:
  0.020755578 = sum of:
    0.020755578 = product of:
      0.041511156 = sum of:
        0.041511156 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041511156 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15327339 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043769516 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. ¬The exchange of bibliographic data and the MARC format : Proc. of the International Seminar on the MARC format and the Exchange of Bibliographic Data in Machine Readable Form ... Berlin, June 14-16, 1971 (1972) 0.00 
    0.0024129727 = product of:
  0.009651891 = sum of:
    0.009651891 = product of:
      0.019303782 = sum of:
        0.019303782 = weight(_text_:der in 4287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019303782 = score(doc=4287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09777089 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043769516 = queryNorm
            0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 4287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4287)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die heute noch bestehenden grundsätzlichen Probleme der Austauschformate wurden schon damals klar erkannt und beschrieben; unter dem Namen SUPERMARC wurde schon die UNIMARC Idee des universellen Austauschformats dargestellt

Years

Themes