-
Chkhenkeli, T.; Garibashvili, I.: Implementation of the UNIMARC format in Georgian libraries (1998)
0.02
0.023514846 = product of:
0.047029693 = sum of:
0.047029693 = product of:
0.094059385 = sum of:
0.094059385 = weight(_text_:i in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094059385 = score(doc=2116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tsvetkova, I.; Skvortsov, V.: Adaption of UNIMARC as Russian exchange format (1999)
0.02
0.023514846 = product of:
0.047029693 = sum of:
0.047029693 = product of:
0.094059385 = sum of:
0.094059385 = weight(_text_:i in 6012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094059385 = score(doc=6012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 6012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998)
0.02
0.017374178 = product of:
0.034748357 = sum of:
0.034748357 = product of:
0.06949671 = sum of:
0.06949671 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06949671 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 8.2001 16:22:33
-
Byrum, J.D.; Parent, I.; Bunn, P.: ¬The BL/LC/NLC Marc harmonization initiative (1998)
0.02
0.016796317 = product of:
0.033592634 = sum of:
0.033592634 = product of:
0.06718527 = sum of:
0.06718527 = weight(_text_:i in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06718527 = score(doc=3704,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.016380532 = product of:
0.032761063 = sum of:
0.032761063 = product of:
0.06552213 = sum of:
0.06552213 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06552213 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.01
0.014332966 = product of:
0.028665932 = sum of:
0.028665932 = product of:
0.057331864 = sum of:
0.057331864 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057331864 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Parent, I.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : an Anglo-American perspective (1995)
0.01
0.013437054 = product of:
0.026874108 = sum of:
0.026874108 = product of:
0.053748216 = sum of:
0.053748216 = weight(_text_:i in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053748216 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hopkins, J.: USMARC as metadata shell (1999)
0.01
0.013437054 = product of:
0.026874108 = sum of:
0.026874108 = product of:
0.053748216 = sum of:
0.053748216 = weight(_text_:i in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053748216 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper introduces the two concepts of Content and Coding which together define Metadata. The encoding scheme used to hold the data content is referred to as a shell. One such shell is the MARC format. In this paper I describe the MARC format and its application to Internet resources, primarily through the OCLC-sponsored Intercat Project
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.01
0.011582785 = product of:
0.02316557 = sum of:
0.02316557 = product of:
0.04633114 = sum of:
0.04633114 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04633114 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997)
0.01
0.011582785 = product of:
0.02316557 = sum of:
0.02316557 = product of:
0.04633114 = sum of:
0.04633114 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04633114 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
-
Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997)
0.01
0.011582785 = product of:
0.02316557 = sum of:
0.02316557 = product of:
0.04633114 = sum of:
0.04633114 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04633114 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
-
Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990)
0.01
0.011582785 = product of:
0.02316557 = sum of:
0.02316557 = product of:
0.04633114 = sum of:
0.04633114 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04633114 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 14:22:51
-
UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994)
0.01
0.010134937 = product of:
0.020269874 = sum of:
0.020269874 = product of:
0.04053975 = sum of:
0.04053975 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04053975 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996)
0.01
0.010134937 = product of:
0.020269874 = sum of:
0.020269874 = product of:
0.04053975 = sum of:
0.04053975 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04053975 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
-
Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996)
0.01
0.010134937 = product of:
0.020269874 = sum of:
0.020269874 = product of:
0.04053975 = sum of:
0.04053975 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04053975 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
-
Setting the record straight : understanding the MARC format (1993)
0.01
0.010077791 = product of:
0.020155583 = sum of:
0.020155583 = product of:
0.040311165 = sum of:
0.040311165 = weight(_text_:i in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040311165 = score(doc=2327,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- MARC is an acronym for Machine Readable Catalogue or Cataloguing. This general description, howcver, is rather misleading as MARC is neither a kind of catalogue nor a method of cataloguing. In fact, MARC is a Standardformat for representing bibliographic information for handling by computer. While the MARC format was primarily designed to serve the needs of libraries, the concept has since been embraced by the wider information community as a convenient way of storing and exchanging bibliographic data. The original MARC format was developed at the Library of Congress in 1965-6 leading to a pilot project, known as MARC I, which had the aim of investigating the feasibility of producing machine-readable catalogue data. Similar work was in progress in the United Kingdom whcre the Council of the British National Bibliography had set up the BNB MARC Project with the rennt of examining the use of machine-readable data in producing the printed British National Bibliography (BNB). These parallel developments led to Anglo-American co-operation an the MARC 11 project which was initiated in 1968. MARC II was to prove instrumental in defining the concept of MARC as a communications format.
-
Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994)
0.01
0.0083981585 = product of:
0.016796317 = sum of:
0.016796317 = product of:
0.033592634 = sum of:
0.033592634 = weight(_text_:i in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033592634 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274526 = queryNorm
0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
